Displaying 20 results from an estimated 212 matches for "again".
2007 Apr 09
0
[Bug 557] New: Makefile doesn't need to link agains libnsl
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=557
Summary: Makefile doesn't need to link agains libnsl
Product: iptables
Version: CVS (please indicate
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: iptables
AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org
ReportedBy: mat...
2006 Jun 09
7
Active DIrectory
I am building a application for my university and I would like to make this
application authenticate agains a Active Directory server. I would like to
know if there is an already built solution for this somewhere online ?
Thanks
--
Nicolas Kassis
--------------------
http://www.nickassis.net
http://www.nickassis.net/blog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:...
2015 Mar 27
4
postfix sasl -> haproxy -> dovecot auth
I will install cyrus-sasl and see how it goes.
Anyway, it would be nice to have same features (authentication agains imap) in dovecot.
On 27 Mar 2015, at 16:27, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote:
> Edgaras Luko?evi?ius skrev den 2015-03-27 14:58:
>
>> I don?t want to allow public network facing servers to be able to
>> reach passwords database. And I want to segregate roles of the...
2005 Jan 25
0
ACLs agains :(
Hello,
I am running Slackware 9.1.
Kernel: linux-2.4.22
Samba 3.0.10 with acl
Kernel supports ACL with XFS.
My problem: On Windows XP e can't see the entire directory ACL. I can
only see POSIX ACL(owner+group+world)
And I cant modify any ACL from windows. Always get access denied. On
Linux side everything works great(getfacl, setfacl, etc).
How can I see the entire ACL list
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bug 557] Makefile doesn't need to link agains libnsl
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=557
kaber@trash.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Version|CVS (please indicate |1.1.2
-------
2014 Apr 08
2
OpenSSL Heartbeat exploit agains KVM guest systems
Is it possible to use this exploit against a kvm guest to read memory used by
the host? In other words: if an exploitable service, say httpd with mod_ssl,
is running in guest system 'vm1' hosted on system 'virthost' then what
implications does that have with respect to guests vm2 and vm3 and to virthost
itself?
--
***...
2014 Apr 08
2
OpenSSL Heartbeat exploit agains KVM guest systems
Is it possible to use this exploit against a kvm guest to read memory used by
the host? In other words: if an exploitable service, say httpd with mod_ssl,
is running in guest system 'vm1' hosted on system 'virthost' then what
implications does that have with respect to guests vm2 and vm3 and to virthost
itself?
--
***...
2015 Jun 23
3
is it safe to have two backed used for the same user?
hi everybody
I wonder if it is safe (and wise) to have two passw-user
databases for the same one user.
I'm thinking,
mail to me via pam
mail to me at this.domain via ldap
whole Maildir would be essentially the same one storage
target, I see permissions have to be mangled, available to
write for both vmail and actual uid.
what do you think? Is it how it's done?
regards
2007 Sep 01
4
OT: 4 dual cores agains 2 quad cores
Hi people,
Do you have pointers to web documents that help me make comparisons
between buying a server with two quad core 2.33 ghz or buying a 4 dual
core 2ghz server?
I am trying to answer a question of performance. It is not important
the redundancy/failover or the price of the server. Just the
performance.
obviously all the hardware specs are the same, the question is the CPU.
--
2015 Jun 23
1
is it safe to have two backed used for the same user?
...ia pam
>> mail to me at this.domain via ldap
>
> the first passdb wins. No problem.
>
>> whole Maildir would be essentially the same one storage target, I see
>> permissions have to be mangled, available to write for both vmail and
>> actual
>> uid.
>
> again, the first userdb wins. Your users can auth agains pam, but the data
> may come from LDAP or a static userdb.
> If you auth agains PAM successfully, does _not_ mean that you
> automatically use system users or Dovecot changes uids or something. All
> such information come from the userd...
2016 Oct 05
3
Failure gpupdate
...root
# group: 3000000
user::rwx
user:root:rwx
group::r-x
group:root:r-x
group:3000010:rwx
mask::rwx
other::r-x
default:user::rwx
default:user:root:rwx
default:group::---
default:group:root:---
default:group:3000010:rwx
default:mask::rwx
default:other::---
> And you did test agains both DC's sysvol's ?
> If not, set preffered server in GPO and test agains all DC's
> If it keeps working you found a bug.
2017 Oct 10
3
Domain member server: user access
Am 2017-10-10 um 16:43 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba:
> Here, a script you can use as start point. ;-)
>
> Run it and it shows the command to "edit" the sam.ldb.
> Just replace ldbedit with ldbsearch and script agains it.
looks promising already, thanks a lot
2008 Jan 03
3
[LLVMdev] Utilizing gperf for TableGen
...n't think
they're fixing it anytime soon.. I'll try to re-open this issue to
them). Also, it seems that the new code produces an extraneous "if
(0);" statement before each of the else-if chains. Normally, compilers
would (and should) just optimize them away but it still counts agains
MSVC's ``nesting limit''.
--
(<_<)(>_>)(>_<)(<.<)(>.>)(>.<)
Life is too short for dial-up.
2006 Jan 18
1
Helps!!!!! Rails database connection guru needed!!!!!!!
...do something here !!!!!
# second connection to anther database
ActiveRecord::base.establish_connection(:adapter =>
"postgresql", :host => "1.2.3.5",:database => "db2",
:username => "user", :password => "pwd")
# do something here agains !!!!!
# third connection to another database
ActiveRecord::base.establish_connection(:adapter =>
"postgresql",:host => "1.2.3.6",:database => "db3",
:username => "user", :password => "pwd")
# do something here agains !!!!!...
2016 Oct 05
3
Failure gpupdate
...a-tool should not segfault during sysvolreset
>C - most generally GPO update issue are linked to access rights of user or computer accessing the share or the file(s).
>I wouldn't bother for now about the A.
>I would solve the segfault first (B).
>Finally once Samba is working fully again (including sysvolreset I mean) I would have a look on rights (issue on rights when accessing GPO folder seems to happen mainly when several DC are >involved).
2007 Jul 18
3
still about winbind idmap customization
Hi,
i've read the thread about idmap customization, i'm planning an
integration between windows AD and MIT kerberos, and i was very
interested on the subject.
Now we are authenticating windows AD user against mit kerberos realm
with a cross-domain trust, and with windows client everythings works.
Ie. Authentication is done with kerberos mit and authorization is done
with windows AD.
Now i'm working to let linux computers authenticate users. What i need
it to Authenticate user agains mit kerberos...
2007 Dec 25
2
Simple File I/O benchmark tool for NT clients
Hi,
I need a simple tool for benchmarking my NT client against my Ubuntu Samba server.
I get 20MB/s during a file copy but I think my limit is the client's hard disk.
Dose anyone know a simple exe tool which simulate file I/O agains the Samba server.
I like to avoid using my lokal disk during the test.
Have looked around but can't find a simpe tool...
2012 Feb 07
2
predict.naiveBayes() bug in e1071 package
...s(dat) <- varnames
nb <- naiveBayes(x=dat, y=out)
new.dat <- t(rnorm(nvar, 5, 0.1))
colnames(new.dat) <- varnames
predict(nb, new.dat, type="raw")
-------------------- 8< --------------------
the results of the last line is usually NaNs. As for the solution:
To protect agains very small numbers, the e1071:::predict.naiveBayes
function takes the probabilities into log-space and adds instead of
multiplying probabilities. However, when calculating the posterior
probabilities of each class (when type = "raw"), the log of the
probabilities are exponentiated, which...
2004 Sep 29
4
Scalability
Hello everyone,
I want an opinion from people who tryed different matching modules to
match diferent types of traffic, especially p2p ones.
I would like to hear which scales better as CPU usage and latency :
ipp2p, iptables-p2p or l7-filter with the p2p patterns. I want to use
one of them to block most of p2p (except maybe dc++ and emule which i
want to shape). I would use the matching rules in
2009 Jan 27
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: -fwritable-strings Change
Hello, Bill
>>
>> I don't see anything obvious wrong, but this is an easy area to
>> break.
>> I'd recommend running the gcc testsuite and checking for regressions.
>>
> Okay, that's a good plan.
I'm strongly agains any target-specific and language-specific hacks in
the generic tree-conversion code. What if we decide to support objc on
non-darwin platforms someday?
This is theoretically possible (well, modulo all bunch of apple-local
stuff arond ;)).
I believe, that TAI should place constant zeros in...