search for: gai

...server, until that times-out and the IPv4 address of the server mounts successfully. Disabling IPv6 altogether works around the problem as expected, but is a bigger hammer than we wanted to use. :-) I found posts from others in a similar situation, and proposed solutions included modifying /etc/gai.conf to use: precedence ::ffff:0:0/96 100 I cp'd /usr/share/doc/glibc-common-2.12/gai.conf to /etc/ and tried that, with several other permutations (e.g. uncommenting other blocks of "label" and "precedence" settings) but none achieved the desired effect. Am I misunde...

In article <bc751efa-07f1-91de-9248-5f90f961bcb4 at gmail.com>, Gordon Messmer <centos at centos.org> wrote: >On 06/08/2018 03:23 PM, Steve Rikli wrote: >> >> This seems the most likely explanation, I'd just like to know for certain >> before I give up on gai.conf and restort to disabling IPv6 or other >> workarounds (e.g. /etc/nfsmount.conf). > >Have you tried specifying "proto=tcp" as a mount option??? That *should* >limit the client to IPv4. Yes -- that's the other workaround I tried successfully. Either in auto.master...

In article <669037eb-029c-eb3b-0c60-6a5121142bb8 at gmail.com>, Gordon Messmer <centos at centos.org> wrote: >On 06/08/2018 10:42 AM, Steve Rikli wrote: > >> I found posts from others in a similar situation, and proposed solutions >> included modifying /etc/gai.conf to use: >> >> precedence ::ffff:0:0/96 100 > > From my reading of that file, you'd need to uncomment all of the > default precedence lines, and modify the last one.?? You couldn't use > that one line, alone.?? It's hard to tell if that's what you...

On 06/08/2018 10:42 AM, Steve Rikli wrote: > I found posts from others in a similar situation, and proposed solutions > included modifying /etc/gai.conf to use: > > precedence ::ffff:0:0/96 100 > From my reading of that file, you'd need to uncomment all of the default precedence lines, and modify the last one.? You couldn't use that one line, alone.? It's hard to tell if that's what you did. /etc/gai.conf wou...

On 06/09/2018 07:51 AM, Steve Rikli wrote: > > I had hopes for gai.conf as the more universal solution, but apparently > it's not useable here. gai.conf works as intended for most applications, here.? For example, if I uncomment the block of "precedence" lines, and swap between "10" and "100" for the last line, then "te...

On 06/08/2018 03:23 PM, Steve Rikli wrote: > > This seems the most likely explanation, I'd just like to know for certain > before I give up on gai.conf and restort to disabling IPv6 or other > workarounds (e.g. /etc/nfsmount.conf). Have you tried specifying "proto=tcp" as a mount option?? That *should* limit the client to IPv4.

...is may also answer the question "Why is the code this way". This visibility can improve understanding and that is likely to improve quality as more developers are better informed. ________________________________________ From: Criswell, John T Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:29 PM To: Gai, Jiading; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Do all user-written passes have to be run through a PassManager object (called from outside the LLVM infrastructure)? On 1/16/14 11:44 AM, Gai, Jiading wrote: > I have written several passes that have no pre-requisites for any > previou...

...6:21 -0600, you wrote: > >> Look at /etc/hosts ::1 is the ipv6 version of localhost. > Right. I actually knew that. So why does that take precedence for the > definition of localhost even though it's not the first line in the > file? IPv6 is preferred when available. See man 5 gai.conf

Greetings, As previously reported by me to the Debian bug tracking system: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- An access list in rsyncd.conf may contain hostnames as well as addresses. It may contain several patterns to match against. address_match (in access.c) does this by trying to match hostname and address against each of the patterns until a match is found or there are no more patterns. 1. For each failed hostname match, an address (non-hostname) match is also attempted. If the pattern isn't a valid address (ma...

Hello, Firstly THANK YOU for the IPv6 NAT support merged in 6.5. It has been almost impossible to get IPv6 into a VM on a laptop that switches between wifi and wired (dock) connections, because you can not add a wifi interface to a bridge. I know NAT is against the IPv6 end-to-end xen but it makes this "just work" for the vast majority of people like me who need to ssh/curl/talk to ipv6 only hosts! So I installed 6.6.0 from the virt-preview repos on Fedora 32 to eagerly test it out. My network config looks like <network> <name...

Hi CentOS4.2 - Is it possible to have an older version of gcc as well as the one that ships with this OS? I need to compile aspseek to run on this distro but it seems to only like older gcc's any ideas?

I have written several passes that have no pre-requisites for any previous LLVM native passes prior to my own. For those passes, I have verified that at least the following two approaches are equivalent in terms of executing those self-written passes and getting the correct results: #if METHOD_1 PassManager PM;

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote: > On 10 Oct 2002, "Green, Paul" <Paul.Green@stratus.com> wrote: > > No new CVS messages have appeared on the rsync-cvs archives since August > > 30th. This seems rather odd-- perhaps a daemon stopped working? If there > > has truly been no activity since that date, I apologize for > >

Hi all I would like to install the minimal level of Centos, with yum & selinux on my servers during the basic install from CD with Anaconda and then use yum to install whatever application is major on that server, so that yum installs its dependencies only, thus keeping to the target of installing only what is needed on a server. Please advise pros/cons of this approach and how to do it. I

...atory Access Control' : that is, superuser power is too addictive to get rid of, and SELinux can do away with 'superuser' powers entirely. AND THAT IS A GOOD THING. Yes, it really is. The buffer overflow exploit for those root-running daemons doesn't stand a chance even if it gains root, as long as the selinux policies are set properly. And, yes, it is possible to set the policies properly; any daemon whose developers feel that it needs to be exempt from such might have a problem running on my servers. In a nutshell, SELinux is on and enabled everywhere here; I can...

...tively skew. Whether any of the application code assumes a 2.96 set of assumptions, where this set of assumptions is broken under 3.x, is unknown (and is the kind of detail I'd like to see in the above-hinted-at porting guide). Links? Pointers? Tips? Clues? Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify...

...lobal address when it only has a link-local address. It should gracefully fall back to IPv4 (as per RFC 6724 or RFC 3484 depending on the kernel version). Since you have an IPv4 address and I assume an IPv4 connection, then this should work over IPv4. I'm assume that you do not have an /etc/gai.conf file installed? David ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dr David Holder CEng FIET MIEEE Erion Ltd, An Cala, Inverkirkaig, Lochinver, Sutherland, IV27 4LR, UK Reception: +44 (0)1422 207000 Direct Dial: +44 (0)131 2026317 http://www.erion.co.uk Regis...

...ial: +44 (0)131 2026317 http://www.erion.co.uk Registered in England and Wales. Registered Number 3521142 Registered Office: Newtons, 49 Coniscliffe Road, Darlington, County Durham, DL3 7EH, UK VAT Number: GB 698 3633 78 On 02/03/2015 14:26, sandy.napoles at eccmg.cupet.cu wrote: > in /etc/gai.conf all is coment > >> Hi Sandy, >> >> Thanks! Curious. Do you have any other interfaces? ifconfig -a should >> show them all including loopback. >> >> What is puzzling me is that it should not even attempt to use IPv6 to >> reach a global address when...

Hi, The getLoopID method was missing from LLVM 3.3's LoopInfo.h. But the latest documentation has it ... probably the documentation is lagging behind in the update? Gai

This sounds like a necessary sanity check for raising teen-agers. Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 >>> BillsCentOS at triad.rr.com 11/07/05 04:23PM >>> Folks, If the reward is nothing more than the egotistical satisfaction of telling that SOB where to get off let the damn issue slid...