Hi I get huge memory leaks using LLVM IRBuilder (trunk version) Basically I recreate a function over and over again, and pretty sure that my code doesn't cause the leak while(true) { Function *fn = module->getFunction(name); if (fn) fn->eraseFromParent(); fn = cast<Function>(module->getOrInsertFunction(name, fnType)); fillFunction(fn); //Fill function with some blocks and instructions.. } Is there any documentation guideline on how to manage memory with LLVM? . I am kind of lost here. I tried anything I could but it seems the leaks won't go away Valgrind gives me lots of .. 110,560 bytes in 1,382 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 176 of 181 ==17474== at 0x4C2596C: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:220) ==17474== by 0x90A922: llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long, unsigned int) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) ==17474== by 0x88A5B6: llvm::ConstantFP::get(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::APFloat const&) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) ==17474== by 0x925E17: llvm::ConstantFoldBinaryInstruction(unsigned int, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Constant*) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) ==17474== by 0x889587: llvm::ConstantExpr::getTy(llvm::Type const*, unsigned int, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Constant*, unsigned int) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) ==17474== by 0x423030: llvm::ConstantFolder::CreateFSub(llvm::Constant*, llvm::Constant*) const (ConstantFolder.h:58) ==17474== by 0x423F7E: llvm::IRBuilder<true, llvm::ConstantFolder, llvm::IRBuilderDefaultInserter<true> >::CreateFSub(llvm::Value*, llvm::Value*, llvm::Twine const&) and also... ==17474== 2,880 bytes in 40 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 155 of 181 ==17474== at 0x4C2596C: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:220) ==17474== by 0x90A922: llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long, unsigned int) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) ==17474== by 0x88423B: llvm::ConstantInt::get(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::APInt const&) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) ==17474== by 0x8843B4: llvm::ConstantInt::get(llvm::IntegerType const*, unsigned long, bool) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) -- Regards, Gabi http://bugspy.net
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Gabi <bugspynet at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi > I get huge memory leaks using LLVM IRBuilder (trunk version) > > Basically I recreate a function over and over again, and pretty sure > that my code doesn't cause the leak > while(true) > { > Function *fn = module->getFunction(name); > if (fn) > fn->eraseFromParent();Err, shouldn't you delete fn here? I'm pretty sure that this just removes the function from the module.> fn = cast<Function>(module->getOrInsertFunction(name, fnType)); > fillFunction(fn); //Fill function with some blocks and instructions.. > }Reid
I think you need to call "llvm::Function::deleteBody() first" On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 15:49, Reid Kleckner <rnk at mit.edu> wrote:> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Gabi <bugspynet at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi >> I get huge memory leaks using LLVM IRBuilder (trunk version) >> >> Basically I recreate a function over and over again, and pretty sure >> that my code doesn't cause the leak >> while(true) >> { >> Function *fn = module->getFunction(name); >> if (fn) >> fn->eraseFromParent(); > > Err, shouldn't you delete fn here? I'm pretty sure that this just > removes the function from the module.Doxygen says that: "eraseFromParent - This method unlinks 'this' from the containing module and deletes it." so it should be fine just calling erase.> >> fn = cast<Function>(module->getOrInsertFunction(name, fnType)); >> fillFunction(fn); //Fill function with some blocks and instructions.. >> } > > Reid > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >- Anders
I fixed a leak that manifests like this in http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=99160&view=rev. Are you synced past there? That leak would only show up in this way if you create at least 1,382 distinct ConstantFPs, which leaks me to believe you didn't show us all of your code. When diagnosing a leak, it's important to have all of the context. You should also run valgrind with --num-callers=50 to get more of the stack trace. When it cuts off inside of LLVM, that doesn't help in reproducing the problem. On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Gabi <bugspynet at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi > I get huge memory leaks using LLVM IRBuilder (trunk version) > > Basically I recreate a function over and over again, and pretty sure > that my code doesn't cause the leak > while(true) > { > Function *fn = module->getFunction(name); > if (fn) > fn->eraseFromParent(); > > fn = cast<Function>(module->getOrInsertFunction(name, fnType)); > fillFunction(fn); //Fill function with some blocks and instructions.. > } > > Is there any documentation guideline on how to manage memory with > LLVM? . I am kind of lost here. I tried anything I could but it seems > the leaks won't go away > > Valgrind gives me lots of .. > > 110,560 bytes in 1,382 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 176 of 181 > ==17474== at 0x4C2596C: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:220) > ==17474== by 0x90A922: llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long, > unsigned int) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) > ==17474== by 0x88A5B6: llvm::ConstantFP::get(llvm::LLVMContext&, > llvm::APFloat const&) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) > ==17474== by 0x925E17: llvm::ConstantFoldBinaryInstruction(unsigned > int, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Constant*) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) > ==17474== by 0x889587: llvm::ConstantExpr::getTy(llvm::Type const*, > unsigned int, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Constant*, unsigned int) (in > /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) > ==17474== by 0x423030: > llvm::ConstantFolder::CreateFSub(llvm::Constant*, llvm::Constant*) > const (ConstantFolder.h:58) > ==17474== by 0x423F7E: llvm::IRBuilder<true, llvm::ConstantFolder, > llvm::IRBuilderDefaultInserter<true> >::CreateFSub(llvm::Value*, > llvm::Value*, llvm::Twine const&) > > and also... > ==17474== 2,880 bytes in 40 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 155 of 181 > ==17474== at 0x4C2596C: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:220) > ==17474== by 0x90A922: llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long, > unsigned int) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) > ==17474== by 0x88423B: llvm::ConstantInt::get(llvm::LLVMContext&, > llvm::APInt const&) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) > ==17474== by 0x8843B4: llvm::ConstantInt::get(llvm::IntegerType > const*, unsigned long, bool) (in /home/gabi/vgen/Debug/vgen) > > -- > Regards, > Gabi > > http://bugspy.net > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >
Maybe Matching Threads
- [LLVMdev] How to avoid memory leaks
- [LLVMdev] How to avoid memory leaks
- [LLVMdev] How to avoid memory leaks
- [LLVMdev] JIT : Does it cache the compiled code of executed functions upon runFunction(..)?
- [LLVMdev] JIT : Does it cache the compiled code of executed functions upon runFunction(..)?