search for: fuzzbal

...g PAM and I believe my passwords are shadowed... I would like to better understand the "To disable tunneled clear text password, change to no here" comment... Is this "clear text" passwords which are then encrypted int he tunnel? and what is an SKey? #syslog Apr 8 22:03:27 fuzzball sshd[27946]: Failed password for joe-user from 192.168.1.3 port 753 Apr 8 22:03:29 fuzzball sshd[27946]: Connection closed by 192.168.1.3 Apr 8 22:03:29 fuzzball sshd[27946]: Cannot close PAM session: System error Apr 8 22:03:29 fuzzball sshd[27946]: Cannot delete credentials: Authentication...

...g PAM and I believe my passwords are shadowed... I would like to better understand the "To disable tunneled clear text password, change to no here" comment... Is this "clear text" passwords which are then encrypted int he tunnel? and what is an SKey? #syslog Apr 8 22:03:27 fuzzball sshd[27946]: Failed password for joe-user from 192.168.1.3 port 753 Apr 8 22:03:29 fuzzball sshd[27946]: Connection closed by 192.168.1.3 Apr 8 22:03:29 fuzzball sshd[27946]: Cannot close PAM session: System error Apr 8 22:03:29 fuzzball sshd[27946]: Cannot delete credentials: Authentication...

...ENT] NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 2 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1] PrimaryDomain=[] | 2834c2834 | < sesssetupX:name=[]\[]@[CLIENT_IP] | --- | > sesssetupX:name=[CLIENT]\[Chris]@[CLIENT_IP] | 2916c2916 | < check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user [FUZZBALL]\[guest]@[CLIENT_IP] with the new password interface | --- | > check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user [CLIENT]\[chris]@[CLIENT_IP] with the new password interface | | (where CLIENT is the name and CLIENT_IP is the IP address of the XP client). | | Since they are using t...

...it occurs when there are non-existant printers listed ... which there are not in our case. There is no firewall between the client and the server except that which Microsoft provides, and we still have the problem with that completely disabled. Here is my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = FUZZBALL netbios name = fzb3 netbios aliases = fzb3 server string = fzb3 bind interfaces only = true interfaces = eth0 null passwords = Yes security = SHARE guest account = guest lanman auth = No client lanman auth = No client plaintext auth = No...

...Domain=[CLIENT] NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 2 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1] PrimaryDomain=[] 2834c2834 < sesssetupX:name=[]\[]@[CLIENT_IP] --- > sesssetupX:name=[CLIENT]\[Chris]@[CLIENT_IP] 2916c2916 < check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user [FUZZBALL]\[guest]@[CLIENT_IP] with the new password interface --- > check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user [CLIENT]\[chris]@[CLIENT_IP] with the new password interface (where CLIENT is the name and CLIENT_IP is the IP address of the XP client). Since they are using the SAME smb...

...imagined slight given by putting > photons in a slightly different place on the screen. Much better > to reply with cryptically short responses that violate grammar rules and > require multiple rereads to even get a sense of what you might possibly > be talking about. After all those fuzzball routers just barely have enough CPU available to pass the short emails. > > Now I suppose your going to respond with that immature drivel that's been floating around, lets see if I remember it: > >> Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >>...

...o criticize for some imagined slight given by putting photons in a slightly different place on the screen. Much better to reply with cryptically short responses that violate grammar rules and require multiple rereads to even get a sense of what you might possibly be talking about. After all those fuzzball routers just barely have enough CPU available to pass the short emails. Now I suppose your going to respond with that immature drivel that's been floating around, lets see if I remember it: > Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > > Why is top-pos...

Hello, I want to share/split bandwidth on a link with unknown bandwidth. I want to exactly share/split bandwidth (for example : FTP 30% , HTTP 20% or 30% for a group of PCs and so forth.) "Traffic-Control-HOWTO" talk that PRIO scheduler is an ideal match for "Handling a link with a variable (or unknown) bandwidth". But PRIO scheduler can not exactly share/split

...ht given by putting >> photons in a slightly different place on the screen. Much better >> to reply with cryptically short responses that violate grammar rules and >> require multiple rereads to even get a sense of what you might possibly >> be talking about. After all those fuzzball routers just barely have >> enough CPU available to pass the short emails. >> >> Now I suppose your going to respond with that immature drivel that's >> been floating around, lets see if I remember it: >> >>> Because it messes up the order in which people...

Hi Ted, Am 04.11.2014 um 04:12 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt: > > Note that since the UPS relies on the voltage from the battery pack to > determine state of charge, it is quite useful to add in the battery pack > voltage to the logs as such: > > --- upslog.c.orig 2012-07-31 10:38:58.000000000 -0700 > +++ upslog.c 2014-02-20 09:23:14.000000000 -0800 > @@ -50,6 +50,7

THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU!!!!!! There was a smaller patch posted to the list for lines -1389,9 +1390,10 a couple years ago, it helped some - BUT - it was still buggy. I have a Compaq R3000, I will get this patch integrated pronto and test Note that since the UPS relies on the voltage from the battery pack to determine state of charge, it is quite useful to add in the battery pack