search for: fundementally

Hi In asterisk 1.8.7.0, an inbound call that was transferred to another peer would have 2 cdr entries. In asterisk 1.8.18.0 this same activity has a single cdr entry. This is a rather large and fundamental change to be enacting halfway through a single family branch, was there any reason why this happened? It means we can't upgrade without doing significant extra development and testing.

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Wei Mi via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> SCEV expansion sometimes generates redundent expr even if there is an >> available expr which can be reused. The redundent exprs can be a lot >> different from existing

> On Aug 23, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Wei, > > I've not seen GCC's SCEV so I cannot make a comparative comment here > (maybe Chris, Andy or Dan can chime in here), but I personally am in > the "make the cleanup passes smarter" camp. We can also try to make > SCEV expansion smarter -- not by

Hi Wei, Wei Mi wrote: > Sanjoy and Andy, thanks a lot for your suggestions. > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Trick<atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On Aug 23, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Sanjoy Das<sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Wei, >>> >>> I've not seen GCC's SCEV so I cannot

SCEV expansion sometimes generates redundent expr even if there is an available expr which can be reused. The redundent exprs can be a lot different from existing exprs so that existing cleanup passes cannot remove them. https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24920 https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24442 https://reviews.llvm.org/D12090 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D21313 already relieved the

...berlin.org> >> Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "David Li" <davidxl at google.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 5:41:12 PM >> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Request suggestions about how to remove redundencies caused by SCEV expansion fundementally >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Wei Mi via llvm-dev >> > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>...

I was recently talking to a friend of mine who produces what's widely referred to as "techno", music that's heavy on electronically generated loops and effects, samples, and has plenty of bass. He doesn't like ogg for a few reasons - he sent me a rather long email, and I've stripped out the nonsense from it (he has some technically irrelevant reasons for not liking

I am running several samba servers (2.2.3a and 2.2.7) in various places as pdcs. Everything seems to be running smoothly, but I can't find any way of restricting access to only those uses who have logged on to the domain. Is this possible? ie at the moment, any user can map a drive to \\server\share, put in a valid user/password pair and have access to that share without going through any

> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Wieling [mailto:eric@fnords.org] > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:52 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Incoming echo cancel > > > Nenad Radosavljevic wrote: > {clip} > > > > Anyone have an idea, why this type of echo happens ? As far as I have

Hi, I've got a small problem that has been driving me nuts over the last couple of days. I have a Samba (v3.0.11 on linux 2.4.21) server that is connected to the internet and has all smb and netbios ports firewalled. Access is provided via a OpenVPN tunnel interface with all traffic going through there. Clients get a /30 address with a route to the server. I have enabled WINS and the

(I've already sent this message to Ted Ts'o directly. I should have sent it to this list first but I didn't know about it until today. My apologies to Ted.) Last Friday a system that I just inherited refused to mount a file system that had been working fine for about 6 months. This is on a Scientific Linux 4.3 system using a 2.6.9 kernel. This is another Linux distribution based on

Sean, thanks for reminding this, Alp did commit a class derived from raw_svector_ostream conatining an internal SmallString he called small_string_ostream. The commit was reverted after a day due to a disagreement about the commit approval and apparently abandoned. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140623/223393.html

...e representation is basically frozen (haven't I said this before?), there is still stuff to do: 1. A new "Globals" graph will be added, which will optimize some situations due to programs that use lots of global variables, or call lots of external functions. This shouldn't fundementally change the interface at all. 2. The heuristics can be improved slightly, improving the quality of the generated graphs. Basically, right now if something happens that cannot be represented in the graph, the node in question is collapsed, losing all field sensitivity. Because some &quo...

Hello Chris, Thursday, January 8, 2004, 5:28:47 PM, you wrote: CL> Though I am mostly ignorant about leading edge distributed (i.e., loosely CL> coupled parallel) programming stuff, I _think_ that network latencies are CL> such that you really need the "big picture" of what a program is doing to CL> know how to profitably distribute and adapt the program to the environment

I don't think we should make flush virtual. Why do you need to do it? Can't you set up the base class to write to use the tail of the memory region as the buffer? On 24 April 2015 at 06:46, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Is this what you're thinking about? > The code is not tested yet, I'd like to know if the overall direction and >

Hello, it it possible to get a kind of diagnostics if the variable is totally optimized away? For example, in: void foo (struct some_type *obj) { ... some code where 'obj' is not used ... bar (obj->some_member); ... some code where 'obj' is not used again ... baz (obj->some_member); } 'obj' is likely to be optimized away so only

After solving a problem with a sweet little application I discovered (more on that below), I wanted to get some feedback about a potential enhancement for IMAP: standardized, MUA independant, server-side sorting. Currently, there are two basic solutions for sorting: handle it during delivery or handle it in the MUA. However, if you handle it in the MUA, you lose some of the client

Is there any advantage of getting a T1 card with a channel bank over 2-3 FXO cards ? Thanks. Dovid -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061031/0f74ec67/attachment.htm

Could you dig into why: + raw_ostream &write(unsigned char C) override { + grow(1); + *OutBufCur++ = C; + return *this; + } Is 3 times as fast as raw_svector_ostream? I don't see a good reason why that should be any faster than: raw_ostream &operator<<(char C) { if (OutBufCur >= OutBufEnd) return write(C); *OutBufCur++ = C; return *this; }

Just a few notes from the peanut gallery... note that I can't really say what is and is not possible with LLVM, I can just talk about our plans (which we believe to be possible). If you guys are really interested in this stuff, try hacking something together and see if it works! :) On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > > Indeed, LLVM will