Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "fullvect".
Did you mean:
fullvec
2012 Apr 03
1
[LLVMdev] pb05 results for current llvm/dragonegg
...nroll-loops -O3 -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns %n.f90 -o %n
gfortran:
gfortran-fsf-4.6 -msse3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3 %n.f90 -o %n
degg+novect+optnz
de-gfortran46 -msse3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns %n.f90 -o %n
degg+fullvect+optnz
de-gfortran46 -msse3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-option=-vectorize -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-option=-unroll-allow-partia
l -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-option=-unroll-runtime -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-option=-bb-vectorize-aligned-only -fpl...
2012 Apr 03
0
[LLVMdev] pb05 results for current llvm/dragonegg
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:57:51 -0400
Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > Hi Jack,
> >
> >> Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current
> >> llvm/dragonegg svn on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode
> >> 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3.
> >
>
2012 Apr 03
3
[LLVMdev] pb05 results for current llvm/dragonegg
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
>> Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current llvm/dragonegg svn
>> on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3.
>
> thanks for the numbers. How does this compare to LLVM 3.0 - were there any
> regressions?
The results from just before