search for: fujita

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 33 matches for "fujita".

2023 Jun 18
11
[PATCH v1 0/5] clean up block_commit_write
*** BLURB HERE *** Bean Huo (5): fs/buffer: clean up block_commit_write fs/buffer.c: convert block_commit_write to return void ext4: No need to check return value of block_commit_write() fs/ocfs2: No need to check return value of block_commit_write() udf: No need to check return value of block_commit_write() fs/buffer.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
2006 Jun 20
1
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]
...00000000 >(XEN) r32 : a00000010095bbc0 r33 : 0000000000000000 r34 : 0000000000000004 >(XEN) r35 : 0000000000000000 r36 : 0000000000000c58 r37 : a0000001009540d0 >(XEN) r38 : ffffffffffff49c0 r39 : 0000000000000000 r40 : a00000010001a930 >(XEN) r41 : 8000000000000307 > >Thanks, >Fujita >> -----Original Message----- >> From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >> [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of yo.fujita >> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 9:03 AM >> To: ''You, Yongkang''; ''Alex Williamson...
2007 May 16
5
[RFC] pv-scsi driver (scsiback/scsifront)
Hi all. We developped a pv-scsi driver that we refered Fujita-san''s scsi-driver and blkback. (see, http://www.xensource.com/files/xensummit_4/Xen_Summit_8_Matsumoto.pdf) The pv-scsi driver''s feature is as follow: * Guest has dedicated SCSI-HBAs of Dom0. * Guest can send scsi_cdb to the HBAs. * Guest recognises the HBAs from hostno...
2006 Aug 02
2
[PATCH 1/6] scsifront/back drivers'' common Makefile and header
# HG changeset patch # User fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp # Node ID 7111077b493ea53ef055ce38098f8af67f87d749 # Parent ed8d345449c176cb5fe0ccff4299da782eb63c08 SCSI frontend and backend drivers'' common Makefile and header Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> diff -r ed8d345449c1 -r 7111077b...
2009 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] Loop elimination with floating point counter.
...Devang, Thanks. Yes, in the case variable i incremented by 1.0f is optimized. I don't know why... Anyway, I've filed this problem into bugzilla(Bug 3299) -- Syoyo On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Syoyo Fujita wrote: > >> Hi LLVM-ers, >> >> I'd like to eliminate dead loop with floating point counter using >> LLVM, but the following loop wasn't optimized by opt. >> >> void >> func() { >> float i; >> for (i = 0.0f; i < 1000.0f; i +=...
2009 Jan 16
1
[LLVMdev] Loop elimination with floating point counter.
On Jan 14, 2009, at 5:11 AM, Syoyo Fujita wrote: > Thanks for many comments. > > The loop with finite fp values(which could be representable in IEEE754 > fp format) such like, Sure, LLVM could definitely do this. If you're interested, I'd suggest starting by extending the existing code that we have to do this. T...
2013 Mar 05
1
UFO - new version capable of S3 API?
I was running the previous version of UFO, the 3.3 one that was based on Swift 1.4.8. Now there is a 3.3.1 based on Swift 1.7.4. The config that I used last time to enable S3 isn't working with the new one, just updated yesterday using yum. I was using tempauth in the old version and I'm still using tempauth. I have a CentOS 6 system and a Fedora 18 system with UFO on them. The
2009 Jan 08
0
[LLVMdev] Loop elimination with floating point counter.
...dependent on the loop analyses being able to determine that the loop is finite, which they don't attempt to do for loops with floating point indices. Attempting to do so would require additional reasoning about floating point precision issues. --Owen On Jan 8, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Syoyo Fujita wrote: > Hi Devang, > > Thanks. Yes, in the case variable i incremented by 1.0f is optimized. > I don't know why... > Anyway, I've filed this problem into bugzilla(Bug 3299) > > -- > Syoyo > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.c...
2009 Jan 08
0
[LLVMdev] Loop elimination with floating point counter.
On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Syoyo Fujita wrote: > Hi LLVM-ers, > > I'd like to eliminate dead loop with floating point counter using > LLVM, but the following loop wasn't optimized by opt. > > void > func() { > float i; > for (i = 0.0f; i < 1000.0f; i += 1.2f) { > } > } FWIW, LLVM opt...
2009 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] Loop elimination with floating point counter.
Hi LLVM-ers, I'd like to eliminate dead loop with floating point counter using LLVM, but the following loop wasn't optimized by opt. void func() { float i; for (i = 0.0f; i < 1000.0f; i += 1.2f) { } } $ clang -emit-llvm-bc floop.c $ opt -std-compile-opts floop.bc | llvm-dis define void @func(...) nounwind { entry: br label %forinc forinc: ; preds = %forinc, %entry
2003 Jun 09
2
[PATCH] Fix for YUV4MPEG support in encoder_example
...ecs say this: + + FRAMEHEADER consists of + string "FRAME " (note the space after the 'E') + unlimited number of ' ' (single space) separated TAGGEDFIELDs + single 'n' line terminator + + ( http://roguelife.org/~fujita/MJPEG/yuv4mpeg.html ) + MPlayer 0.9.0 writes "FRAME" with no space at the end, however. + To deal with this.... + */ + if(ret<6)break; if(memcmp(frame,"FRAME\n",6)){ - fprintf(stderr,"Loss of framing in YUV input...
2008 Dec 22
17
[PATCH 0 of 9] swiotlb: use phys_addr_t for pages
Hi all, Here''s a work in progress series whcih does a partial revert of the previous swiotlb changes, and does a partial replacement with Becky Bruce''s series. The most important difference is Becky''s use of phys_addr_t rather than page+offset to represent arbitrary pages. This turns out to be simpler. I didn''t replicate the map_single_page changes, since
2012 Jun 05
13
New btrfs-progs integration branch
...rogs-unstable.git/ integration-20120605 And viewable in human-readable form at: http://git.darksatanic.net/cgi/gitweb.cgi?p=btrfs-progs-unstable.git Shortlog is below. Hugo. (*) "I don''t care about works-on-my-machine. We are not shipping your machine!" ---- Akira Fujita (1): Btrfs-progs: Fix manual of btrfs command Chris Samuel (1): Fix "set-dafault" typo in cmds-subvolume.c Csaba Tóth (1): mkfs.btrfs on ARM Goffredo Baroncelli (1): scrub_fs_info( ) file handle leaking Hubert Kario (2): Fix segmentation fault when openin...
2011 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] AVX Status?
Hello David, > I try to put [AVX] in the subject of patch mailings (to -commits) and > commit messages.  Once in a while I forget.  I'll try to remeber to send > semething to -dev when major stuff appears. Good. I am also trying to sending a patch to llvm-commits. It'd be better for me to use [AVX] prefix in the subject so that we can easily identify "This is an AVX
2011 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] AVX Status?
Ralf Karrenberg <Chareos at gmx.de> writes: > This sounds great! > > For my case, I only require some basic support, so I am optimistic > that your next few patches will provide everything I need. If my evil plan works out, within the next 10 or so patches we should be in a place where pushing everything up goes pretty quickly. It's about 8 TableGen patches and then a
2009 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] Loop elimination with floating point counter.
Thanks for many comments. The loop with finite fp values(which could be representable in IEEE754 fp format) such like, void foo() { float i; for (i = 0.0f; i < 1000.0f; i += 1.2f) { } } could reach the end condition under any fp rounding mode, and eliminating the loop has no side effects. (for example, floating point control register does not change because the increment does
2008 May 22
3
[LLVMdev] How to get a return type of a function with LLVM-C API
Hi LLVM-ers, I am trying to get a return type of a function(from bitcode file) with LLVM-C API, but there seems no appropriate API to do that. I've tried to do that with following code, ---- LLVMModuleRef M; LLVMMemoryBufferRef MemBuf; LLVMValueRef F; // Function LLVMTypeRef RetTy; char *ErrStr; // // -- Load shader module //
2009 Jan 09
2
[LLVMdev] Loop elimination with floating point counter.
FWIW, I believe icc -O3 turns on the equivalent of -ffast-math by default. I could be misremembering which compilers do this though :) This flag allows you to make all kinds of nice simplfiying assumptions about floating point. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > I assume it checks that the end condition and the increment can both > be
2007 Jan 02
0
[PATCH 1/4] add scsi-target and IO_CMD_EPOLL_WAIT patches
.... The latter enables applications to handle AIO and non-AIO fds in the same loop. blktap uses the different patch, AIO event queue patch for the same aim. The IO_CMD_EPOLL_WAIT patch will be merged into mainline (and the AIO event queue will not) so the scsi target daemon uses it. Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> diff -r 489f28021f26 -r 105d5d6b4e0d patches/linux-2.6.16.33/series --- a/patches/linux-2.6.16.33/series Wed Dec 20 09:47:24 2006 +0000 +++ b/patches/linux-2.6.16.33/series Wed Jan 03 01:34:02 2007 +0900 @@ -33,3 +33,5 @@ x86-elfnote-as-preprocessor-m...
2008 Nov 13
69
[PATCH 00 of 38] xen: add more Xen dom0 support
Hi Ingo, Here''s the chunk of patches to add Xen Dom0 support (it''s probably worth creating a new xen/dom0 topic branch for it). A dom0 Xen domain is basically the same as a normal domU domain, but it has extra privileges to directly access hardware. There are two issues to deal with: - translating to and from the domain''s pseudo-physical addresses and real machine