search for: freebsd10

...gt; There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in > a better state now. > > 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. > > Please test, let me know how it goes, and upload binaries. Built, tested and uploaded: SHA256 (clang+llvm-6.0.0-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = 1334db5949ec0c78cd6e9b798f0b397fe9e99240d98bcfc834e4410258b98372 SHA256 (clang+llvm-6.0.0-rc2-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = a7c0b1e4cfe3d608ee77472c7f17fe6b9493c7259aca80fcdd3b8a4fe49ad92d On amd64-freebsd10 there were 896 unexpected test failures: Expected Passes : 45004 Expe...

...e-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> 5.0.0-rc1 has just been tagged. >>> >>> Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know if >>> there are any issues. >> >> Built and tested rc1. Test failures on amd64-freebsd10: >> >> FAIL: LLVM-Unit :: ExecutionEngine/Orc/./OrcJITTests/DummyRPC.TestClearHandlers (1346 of 38616) >> FAIL: AddressSanitizer-Unit :: ./Asan-i386-inline-Test/AddressSanitizer.DoubleFreeTest (2480 of 38616) >> FAIL: AddressSanitizer-Unit :: ./Asan-i386-inline-Test/Address...

Hi, I've just tagged 5.0.1-rc3, please test and report the results. Hopefully, this will be the last RC and the final release will be next week. -Tom

...ellard via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> The 6.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged. Testers may begin testing and >> reporting results. > > Built for FreeBSD 10, tested and uploaded: > > SHA256 (clang+llvm-6.0.1-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = b2858b1bf254f9aed977638229d90e3a8aeb245e9f12156bda5597cd82e6ae20 > SHA256 (clang+llvm-6.0.1-rc2-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = 5d42eb7022a1974edcb74091b93a6c6eaa30cac12ea6f1f93324577b5e2a4261 > > ====================================================================== > Test...

Dear testers, There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in a better state now. 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. Please test, let me know how it goes, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans

...n64.exe No building or testing problems encountered on FreeBSD 10. The only strange thing is that relative to -rc4, I now got a lot more "differs between phase 2 and phase 3" messages. But this is probably due to turning off assertions. Uploaded: SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.7.0-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = 07cf94ddff7c4dff112eeadb95aab1b905cd40a3462c6afd808988164146d880 SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.7.0-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = fe8c7136d254a4a25967c4d8d97f48a985cb594fe5c864dc234526a6bacfebe2 -Dimitry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signa...

Followed the instructions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html The upgrade borked. Error message: Can't find 'kernel' When I checked with ls /boot/kernel/, the directory does exist. :-( Since the system has encrypted root partion with ZFSonROOT, I tried to follow instructions at https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?&t=8958 to boot

...at 00:41, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> 5.0.0-rc1 has just been tagged. >> >> Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know if >> there are any issues. > > Built and tested rc1. Test failures on amd64-freebsd10: > > FAIL: LLVM-Unit :: ExecutionEngine/Orc/./OrcJITTests/DummyRPC.TestClearHandlers (1346 of 38616) > FAIL: AddressSanitizer-Unit :: ./Asan-i386-inline-Test/AddressSanitizer.DoubleFreeTest (2480 of 38616) > FAIL: AddressSanitizer-Unit :: ./Asan-i386-inline-Test/AddressSanitizer.Realloc...

Hi testers! 3.6.0-rc1 was just tagged, so testing can begin. I'm not super familiar with the testing script yet, but I believe the idea is to run it as follows: $ utils/release/test-release.sh -release 3.6.0 -rc 1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu With the -triple value substituted for your platform. Bill's 3.5rc1 email also said 'test-suite' needs to be run by hand. Please

Hi: The FreeBSD10-Beta3 kernel is recompiled successfully with the following in /etc/make.conf WITH_NEW_XORG=yes WITH_KMS=yes WITH_GALLIUM=yes But after installworld, there is no sight of new xorg-server-1.12.4 in pkg cache nor in /usr/ports: How to install new xorg and where is the source? # pkg search xorg linu...

...eed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 22106 test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 9 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 22106 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 3 host-install(3) broken blocked in 22106 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 7 freebsd-install fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 5 x...

...testing, let me know. ... > Thanks. Committed in r240577. > > I've uploaded a Windows installer based on that version to the sftp > with sha1 f8ead22e954933357edaab312df04ad1ad6fdab2. Built and tested fine on FreeBSD. Binaries uploaded: SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = c4ecb25f1a4042432de9e77bd7bff80243d8f66b11cd4a1365aba52cbde35bc5 SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = eef5b9aedbb0c54468d6c4f06267ae3bbdf97f49d91273ce16eedde83bb33db5 -Dimitry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: si...

Hi, I just tagged LLVM 4.0.1-rc3, and it's ready for testing. If all goes well, we will do the final release on Monday. -Tom

Dear testers, The final version of 5.0.0 has just been tagged. There were no changes after rc5. Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp. For those following along: this means 5.0.0 is complete, but it will take a few days to get the tarballs ready and published on the web page. I will send the announcement once everything's ready. Many thanks everyone for your hard work!

...s <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> 4.0.0-rc2 was just tagged from the branch at r294535. > > Building on FreeBSD 10 at least didn't crash this time, and lld built just fine. :) I uploaded the following: > > SHA256 (clang+llvm-4.0.0-rc2-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = 0725eed8060a1a9983432a547a51c78e155584575120e449c41bebd80eb64652 > SHA256 (clang+llvm-4.0.0-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = 0b71197a3288b4c7c54f12497b4907257eda71d9be0cb26f9497b25539b5a3c3 > > On i386-freebsd10 there were some interesting test results: > > ***********...

Hi, The only regression in 3.6.1 -rc1 was on MIPS and it has been confirmed fixed, so I have now tagged 3.6.1 -final. Testers can start building and uploading the final binaries. Thanks, Tom

Hi, I've just tagged the 4.0.1 -rc1 release. Testers can start testing and uploading the binaries. If you still have bug fixes you want to get into the 4.0.1 release, you have until May 22 to submit merge requests. -Tom

On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:11, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: >> On 18 Jan 2018, at 15:03, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> wrote: >>> >>> Am 2018-01-18 14:55, schrieb Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev: >>>> On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg

Hello testers, 4.0.0-rc2 was just tagged from the branch at r294535. There are still open relase blocking bugs and merge requests, so this will not be the last release candidate, but we've had a lot of merges since the last one, and I'd like to see what the testing looks like. The test-release.sh script was updated to also include lld. Make sure you're using the latest version of

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 18 Jan 2018, at 15:03, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> wrote: >> >> Am 2018-01-18 14:55, schrieb Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev: >>> On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers >>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> Start