search for: fpuent

On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:30:00PM +0100, Francisco Puentes wrote: > Now I have other problem: I have a Module and I need generate a > iostream (memory) with native x86 code (maybe elf/coff) to be executed > later (into the guest process space, without fork!!). I studied llc > and lli, but they don't help me much. Any idea? Are there any guy > working in some like that? In

...t. All (ok, not all) constructor classes would have as first parameter this context, so it would be easy lock/unlock the context and allow critical sections in the code. Happy new year :-) ============================================ You can use some of this accounts: * fran at cic-online.net * fpuentes at udc.es fpuentes at acm.org fpuentes at edu.xunta.es fpuentes at hotmail.com ============================================ -----Mensaje original----- De: Misha Brukman [mailto:brukman at uiuc.edu] Enviado el: viernes, 31 de diciembre de 2004 19:20 Para: Francisco Puentes CC: 'LLVM...

Hi again, and thanks (Reid) for your fast response: Yes, it works!!! Only changing the order of libraries in the Makefile. Nowaday I have my software with the capability of compile assembly, bytecode (from buffer and file) and link them with a set of libraries. It seems to work perfectly (I don't generate code yet). My real aim is to have a process (host) with execute several no-jit

I am using 'portaudio' and 'speex' to implement a speech audio capture/playback. Preprocess works fine but not the echo canceller (associated with preprocessor). I have read 'testecho.c' but it didn't help me. What I am doing bad? This is my implementation: One thread to capture and playback, both are different functions called in different times directly from

> > Now I have other problem: I have a Module and I need generate a iostream > > (memory) with native x86 code (maybe elf/coff) to be executed later > (into > > the guest process space, without fork!!). I studied llc and lli, but > they > > don't help me much. Any idea? Are there any guy working in some like > that? > > There's two approaches that

> > What are the classes evolved in to convert bytecode to x86 code > > directly? Without Just In Time (all at once). > > There is currently no such thing. Please see the other email I just > sent for details as to what your choices are. > Last question (I promise you): Can LLVM generated ELF or COFF binaries from a Module into an iostream? > -- > Misha Brukman

> >>> Would be great if we append into the documentation several "patters" > >>> to show how perform with LLVM. It would accelerate the learn curve for > >>> beginners like me, avoiding basic errors and mistakes. If I reach a > >>> good level with LLVM I can make these. > >> > >> I'm not sure if I understand what you

> > Would be great if we append into the documentation several "patters" > > to show how perform with LLVM. It would accelerate the learn curve for > > beginners like me, avoiding basic errors and mistakes. If I reach a > > good level with LLVM I can make these. > > I'm not sure if I understand what you mean. Are you looking for an > "LLVM

Hi, everybody: I am a beginner with LLVM, in fact today was the first day that I use it. I have several questions about LLVM: Can I use LLVM to compile several files (bytecode), scripts (char*) and link them with external libraries generating *only* one executable (all in memory)? Can I invoke externals functions from a guest (LLVM generated) code which exist in the host code (the code that