search for: fpp

Dear R Developers, For package seriation I use Fortran code. I recently got a request to add #if defined(__ICC) || defined(__INTEL_COMPILER) USE IFPORT #endif to the code since the Intel Fortran compiler otherwise has problems with rand(). However, to enable the FPP preprocessor I have to either add a compiler flag (-cpp for gFortran) which is possibly not portable or change the extension to .F, .fpp, .FPP (and a few others) which automatically invokes the preprocessor (hopefully on all platforms). I tried .fpp and added the following to Makevars: OBJECTS...

In PHP something like: $pid = pcntl_fork(); if ($pid != 0) { // we are the parent // do parent stuff exit; } // we are the child, detatch from terminal $sid = posix_setsid(); if ($sid < 0) { die; } // do child stuff On 04/19/2019 02:00 PM, Mark Wiater wrote: > On 4/19/2019 1:49 PM, Dovid Bender wrote: >> Mark, >> >> I am using PHP agi and when forking

...ses(y, h = 10, level = c(80, 95), fan = FALSE, initial = c("optimal", "simple"), alpha = NULL, lambda = NULL, biasadj = FALSE, x = y, ...) My query is that if I do not mention the initial value will its default value be "optimal". A MWE would be : library(fpp) oildata <- window(oil,start=1996,end=2007) fit3 <- ses(oildata, h=3) In the above is the default value of initial "optimal" or "simple" ? Note I have taken this example from https://www.otexts.org/fpp/7/1 Best Regards, Ashim [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...1x", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|0x8000, 0600) = -1 EEXIST (File exists) It seems like it opens the file ReadWrite and then tries to open it readonly. I don't know why. It bangs then. Thanks for any hint, Rok Krulec Portoroz/Slovenia, 28.Nov 2001 @ 15:34 CET Public GnuPG key @ http://rok.fpp.edu/pgp.key Portoroz, 28.Nov 2001 @ 15:39 CET Public GnuPG key @ http://rok.fpp.edu/pgp.key

...n = FALSE, initial = c("optimal", > "simple"), alpha = NULL, lambda = NULL, biasadj = FALSE, x = y, ...) > > My query is that if I do not mention the initial value will its default > value be "optimal". > > A MWE would be : > > library(fpp) > oildata <- window(oil,start=1996,end=2007) > fit3 <- ses(oildata, h=3) > > In the above is the default value of initial "optimal" or "simple" ? > > Note I have taken this example from https://www.otexts.org/fpp/7/1 > > Best Regards, > Ashim...

I have written a module pass. When I use the debug pass structure option, the name of my module pass is printed but then I get "Unnamed pass" when the FunctionPassManagerImpl *FPP calls dumpPassStructure (in PassManager.cpp). Is this the expected behavior, or should I be concerned that there is an error in my approach? Thanks, Scott

The following dump-core patches changes its format into ELF, adds PFN-GMFN table, HVM support, and adds experimental IA64 support. - ELF format Program header and note section are adopted. - HVM domain support To know the memory area to dump, XENMEM_set_memory_map is added. XENMEM_memory_map hypercall is for current domain, so new one is created. and hvm domain builder tell xen its

Hi, I am intending to save a path-describing character object in a slot of a class I'm working on. In order to have the option to use "system.file" etc in such string-saved path definitions, I wrote this ExpressionEvaluator <- function(x){ x <- tryCatch( expr=base::parse(text=x), error = function(e){return(as.expression(x))}, finally=TRUE) return(x) } This

...quired' by pass!"' failed. If I remove the addRequired from getAnalysisUsage, I get this error: opt: /x/jeffhao/llvm/llvm-2.4/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1440: virtual llvm::Pass* llvm::MPPassManager::getOnTheFlyPass(llvm::Pass*, const llvm::PassInfo*, llvm::Function&): Assertion `FPP && "Unable to find on the fly pass"' failed. What else needs to be added to make the code run? Jeff On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:38:26 -0600, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > nitisha warkari wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to use the f...

...ks, Scott On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Scott Ricketts<sricketts at maxentric.com> wrote: > I have written a module pass. When I use the debug pass structure > option, the name of my module pass is printed but then I get "Unnamed > pass" when the FunctionPassManagerImpl *FPP calls dumpPassStructure > (in PassManager.cpp). Is this the expected behavior, or should I be > concerned that there is an error in my approach? > > Thanks, > Scott >

I've some demand data, for which I wish to judge what will be the direction in the forecast period (Up/Down). What will be a best ML method to do this? Currently I'm using the data given below - 9/4/2016 241 9/11/2016 233 9/18/2016 226 9/25/2016 282 10/2/2016 291 10/9/2016 282 10/16/2016 308 10/23/2016 291 10/30/2016 268 11/6/2016 262 11/13/2016 273 11/20/2016 262 11/27/2016 309 12/4/2016

I suggest, you read: Forecasting: principles and practice from Hyndman-Athana?sopou?los https://www.otexts.org/fpp

...k for help left right and center. My problem is that I cannot get my function to give me the solution. Here is my code: ## PRIMARY FUNCTION f=function(x){ out=(2/(3))*exp(x^3)-(10)*log(x) return(out) } ## 1ST DERIVATIVE fp=function(x){ out=(2)*(x^2)*exp(x^3)-(10/x) return(out) } ## 2ND DERIVATIVE fpp=function(x){ out=(4)*(x)*exp(x^3)+(6)*(x^4)*exp(x^3)+(10/x^2) return(out) } I am trying to find the "zero" of "fp",my 1st derivative, with my newton algorithm: newbon=function(x0,epsi,f,fp){ ## where "a" corresponds to x^n et ## "b" corresponds to x^n+1...

...n Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Scott Ricketts<sricketts at maxentric.com> wrote: >> I have written a module pass. When I use the debug pass structure >> option, the name of my module pass is printed but then I get "Unnamed >> pass" when the FunctionPassManagerImpl *FPP calls dumpPassStructure >> (in PassManager.cpp). Is this the expected behavior, or should I be >> concerned that there is an error in my approach? >> >> Thanks, >> Scott >> >

...e the PEI pass and the RegAlloc pass together. What are the cases where one uses a RegAlloc pass but not PEI pass? Another concern is about the re-use of CallGraphSCC pass. I see that in lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraphSCCPass.cpp's CGPassManager::RunPassOnSCC() method there is this line, Changed |= FPP->runOnFunction(*F); and FPP is cast to (FPPassManager*). However, if we want to re-use CallGraphSCCPass in CodeGen, shouldn't we be casting FPP to the MachineFunction equivalent and be calling the runOnMachineFunction() method instead? So should we inherit CallGraphSCCPass to create MachineC...

...39; failed. > > If I remove the addRequired from getAnalysisUsage, I get this error: > > opt: /x/jeffhao/llvm/llvm-2.4/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1440: virtual > llvm::Pass* llvm::MPPassManager::getOnTheFlyPass(llvm::Pass*, const > llvm::PassInfo*, llvm::Function&): Assertion `FPP && "Unable to find > on the > fly pass"' failed. > > What else needs to be added to make the code run? Is it possible for you to provide a reproducible test case to help us understand what is going on ? Thanks, - Devang

Hi Jakob, On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > > On Oct 4, 2012, at 2:27 PM, "Madhusudan C.S" <madhusudancs at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Basically, the PrologEpilogInsertion pass will add a bit mask to >> MachineModuleInfo describing which registers are clobbered by the function >> being compiled. Later,

...9;t do C99 and I'm converting from C++ // so dump all the decelerations here to make it build as C89. static const long BufferSize = 8192; ogg_sync_state m_syncState; ogg_stream_state m_streamState; int64_t m_lastGranulePos = 0; int64_t failingSeekPoint = -1; int32_t serialno = -1; int fpp, spf; int decoding = 1; ogg_page page; char* buffer = NULL; long bytesRead = 0; uint8_t headerFLags = 0; int pageContinuesPacket = 0; int firstPacketInPage = 1; int packetsToFetch = 1; int packetOutRet; FILE* fp = fopen(filename, "rb"); ogg_sync_init(&m_syncState); while...

...;> If I remove the addRequired from getAnalysisUsage, I get this error: >> >> opt: /x/jeffhao/llvm/llvm-2.4/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1440: virtual >> llvm::Pass* llvm::MPPassManager::getOnTheFlyPass(llvm::Pass*, const >> llvm::PassInfo*, llvm::Function&): Assertion `FPP && "Unable to find >> on the >> fly pass"' failed. >> >> What else needs to be added to make the code run? > > Is it possible for you to provide a reproducible test case to help us > understand what is going on ? > Thanks, > - > D...

Buenos días, Os cuento: Cargo la librería "Forecast" y ejecuto su función Arima(...) sobre una serie temporal: mimodelo <- Arima(miST$miserie, ...); Ahora si ejecuto las siguientes sentencias, voy obteniendo los resultados contenidos en "mimodelo", pero algunos de ellos no sé lo que son: mimodelo[[1]] obtengo los coeficientes del modelo ARIMA mimodelo[[2]] obtengo el