search for: forseeing

This is kind of an odd request so I''ve got the asbestos undies on. I have a client who currently has a layer 3 switch plugged into a cisco pix. Routing is handled via RIP and now the client wants to insert a linux box running shorewall behind the PIX and in front of the switch to act as a content filter+backup firewall. The immediate problem I forsee happening is that RIP broadcasts to

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > lost wrote: >> Ok than, but how to insert a call to an undefined function? > > You need to have the function declaration and insert a call to that. > Once your LazyFunctionCreator is called, you fill in the body and call > JIT->getPointerToFunction() on it and return that result. > > I

Hi: Recently I have some study on linux container(lxc), which is a light weight OS level virtualization. With the previous knowledge of tapdisk, I have an assumption that, I may could use the vhd for each container to seperate the storage of all containers, or even in later days, vhd is stored in distributed storage, container could be migrated. Build filesystem on tapdev

Hello. I am new to this forum. If this issue has been discussed already, please inform me, but my STFW have indicated that it has not. If SS7 were available on * would it make commercial sense to use it? There are case studies on the web (courtesy of the Death Star :->) for ISPs with 10,000+ subscriber lines showing clear cost savings in transitioning from PRI to SS7 controlled IMT. My

Hi, I hope this is the correct list for my question. I found a wired behaviour of my R installation on the evaluation of anonymous functions. minimal working example ### f<-function(x) { print( 2*x ) }(2) class(f) f(3) f<-function(x) { print( 2*x ) }(4)(5) f(6) ### leads to ### > f<-function(x) { + print( 2*x ) + }(2) > > class(f) [1] "function"

Hi I am thinking of ripping albums to a single flac file with embedded cuesheet. As track and index points have to be on a 588 sample boundary due to the CD TOC standard working in 588 sample frames, I thought it may be beneficial to rip CDs with a blocksize of 588 samples. According to the format page on sourcefourge a stream is subset if "The blocksize bits in the frame header must be

So with all this ongoing Linus crap I'm going to be brave and ask for reasons why 0.0.16 kernel API can't become 1.0.0. Pros: All old userspace compatibility is gone. No more UMS cruft to support. Something can be shipped on distros at last, people get to use the driver. 3D drivers exist and use the interface, there is an investment in these already. Reasons against: (I'm making

Ok than, but how to insert a call to an undefined function? > See ExecutionEngine::InstallLazyFunctionCreator(). > http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1ExecutionEngine.html#6a126d6cd1fa07a4331179597de0c46a > > Nick >

lost wrote: > Ok than, but how to insert a call to an undefined function? You need to have the function declaration and insert a call to that. Once your LazyFunctionCreator is called, you fill in the body and call JIT->getPointerToFunction() on it and return that result. I haven't actually tried this, but it seems to be the only way to use this API, so I presume someone else has.

So you mean that is not the way. But what is InstallLazyFunctionCreator for? 2010/4/17 Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com>: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: >> lost wrote: >>> Ok than, but how to insert a call to an undefined function? >> >> You need to have the function declaration and insert a call to

Since has_one :colour :through => :species isn''t supported (for some reason unknown to me), can anyone forsee any problems that the following workaround might cause (in the Photo class). has_many :artists, :through => :artist_photos has_one :artist_photo So effectively, the has_many statement gives me the through functionality I need, but the has_one restricts the program to only

I am not sure if I am going to use SIP registration's or just specify the host ip address in sip.conf. Are there any pros or cons to the two? My phones will have a static IP address and won't be changed unless a admin does it. So the logical path would be to just turn off registration on the sip account (in the phone setup). Can anyone forsee a problem to this? Something I will miss

Hey, There are some patches I''ve and a bunch of other work that I forsee coming that will mean more patches. I was wondering what the process is of getting checkin access for the Xen tree? P.S. ''konradwilk'' is the account name.

I''ve been meaning to look into using Switchtower/Capistrano for some time now, and after briefly taking a look, it seems geared towards deploying ''an application'' perhaps to multiple machines and keeping it in check in all cases. I was wanting to use it in some legacy situations where the case is more that I deploy an instance of an application multiple times, sometimes

I have posted this before with not much response so I am posing the question again. Is there a solution for this very apparent issue with mod_fcgid that the "First connection is incredibly slow". It seems its b/c mod_fcgid doesnt keep at least 1 persistent connection around that this first connection needs to start up and then every other request is fast. Is there a solution to this?

Am 10.10.23 um 22:23 schrieb Dave Airlie: >> I think we're then optimizing for different scenarios. Our compute >> driver will use mostly external objects only, and if shared, I don't >> forsee them bound to many VMs. What saves us currently here is that in >> compute mode we only really traverse the extobj list after a preempt >> fence wait, or when a vm is

Hello All I apologize for the basic questions, but I only recently discovered the benefits of Ubuntu/Linux as well as Wine. As I basically know nothing, my questions are pretty simple: 1) As I will be using Linux/Ubuntu (along with wine) for business purposes, is Wine and what it does 100% legal? 2) Can I open and use both a Linux based program and a windows based program (using wine obviously)

Hello Everyone: ????? When user got quota exceed and trying to delete mail. Most MUA's default "move to trash folder" will proceed by copy mail to trash folder,then by delete/expunge it(copy before expunge). Unfortunately this will not success due to quota exceed. Is there any way to let dovecot proceed it by IMAP MOVE instead of "copy to trash

im a begginer in RoR and am using rails 3.2.3 and ruby 1.8.7 This forum has helped me to progress but I''m confused by one thing. My app is supposed to allow seaching for results depending on the check boxes that are checked. In my case, when the user checks a determined facility and clicks "search" the corresponding hotels with only those facilities should be returned. I can

I would like to have a customer that has references to two addresses, a billing address and a shipping address. In a non-rails environment I would have two keys in the customers table, billing_address_id and shipping_address_id to reference the addresses. It appears that ActiveRecord expects the parent id to reside in the child table, regardless of whether the relationship is one-to-one or