Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "formants".
Did you mean:
formant
2004 Dec 26
2
Prosodic/phonetic analysis with R
...ular I would want to use R to formulate and
evaluate specific models.
So I would like to ask R people for their recommendations
for a program which would
a) Take as input a sound file in one of the common formats
(".wav", ".au")
b) perform at least basic phonetic analysis (formants, F0,
spectrograms, ... )
b) Save to file a representation of the basic phonetic
analysis which it has done, in a form which R can readily
import and use.
I've come across 'praat':
http://www.praat.org
which seems to offer a spohisticated range of analyses, though
it'...
2006 Feb 16
0
(m)simtest ?
Hi,.
We have 2 values (first formant F1, second formant F2) for a given
phoneme for six languages. We want to see whether the languages are
significantly different one from another for this given phoneme.
We have done a manova on our data and it works well, but we doesn't
allow us to see which pair of languages are different.
If we have only one formant for the phoneme, we would use
2001 Sep 05
2
Understanding of Vorbis coder
Hi
I have gone through the document available in the net regarding the
Vorbis encoder /Decoder.
Based on that i have prepared a understanding document on the
encoder/decoder block. I would like to
know whether my understanding of the coder is OK. If there are any
other additional block /information pl. provide me
with the same.
Thanks and regards
S.Padmashri
<HR NOSHADE>
<UL>
2005 Oct 14
2
Steganographic extension to Speex
Hello kind developers,
I am planning on creating a steganographic extension for speex/CELP.
Since speex/CELP is lossy, there should be quite many bits that one
can use for hiding data.
I'm familiar with the principles of CELP (two filter loops, one for
pitch, the other for formants, let the raw speech frame run through
those filter loops, take residue signal, map it on a codebook entry,
transmit the the two filters and the codebook key). Please correct
me if I understood something wrong.
As if right now, my questions are more from an engineers point of
view (which I could no...
2005 Oct 25
1
Steganographic extension to Speex
...s a more
commonly used term for this is "noise shaping").
>>- which bits of a transmitted frame are the two filters, which are
>>codebook keys?
>
> what do you mean?
I mean, that we send the speech frame by frame. So a frame needs to
contain the two filters (pitch and formants), the first couple of
values (raw, now we can apply the filter to predict the rest of the
frame), and then the codebook keys of which the corresponding
entries are added to get raw speech data back.
Ciao,
Bj?rn
--
You are a bundle of energy, always on the go.
--
Important! Please recognize m...
2007 Dec 21
1
post hoc in repeated measures of anova
Hallo, I have this dataset with repeated measures. There are two
within-subject factors, "formant" (2 levels: 1 and 2) and "f2 Ref" (25
levels: 670, 729, 788, 846, 905, 1080, 1100, 1120, 1140, 1170, 1480,
1470, 1450, 1440, 1430, 1890, 1840, 1790, 1740, 1690, 2290, 2210,
2120, 2040, 1950), and one between-subject factor, lang (2 levels:1
and 2). The response variable
2005 Jan 13
0
autocorrelation and levinson-durbin
> 3) a more general question:
> i have not been able to find any reason why
> 10 lpcs are used. i suppose 10 lpcs are
> enough for prediction and using more coeffs
> would not have made too much difference.
> and 10 is even, good for lpc->lsf. had read
> somewhere "historically", during the analog
> era, this number is used. or maybe 10 is analagous
> to
2005 Oct 14
0
Steganographic extension to Speex
...kely to be heard. You would need to use "fractions of bits" at a
time. Even then, it may be hard to hide data efficiently (so it's hard
to detect whether steganography was applied).
> I'm familiar with the principles of CELP (two filter loops, one for
> pitch, the other for formants, let the raw speech frame run through
> those filter loops, take residue signal, map it on a codebook entry,
> transmit the the two filters and the codebook key). Please correct
> me if I understood something wrong.
That's pretty much how it works (of course, there's plenty of det...
2013 Dec 16
2
configure lmtp to deliver to email addresses case insensitively
Dear List
Using dovecot 2.1.7 with LMTP and exim4 I want to accept local parts
regardless of their case.
Exim does all virtual alias handling and delivers the messages to
dovecot LMTP addressed to the right mailbox name. This works well except
for addresses which do not need to be resolved by exim and which do have
the "wrong" case in the local part.
For example: There is a
1999 Aug 15
1
Vorbis transform description
OK, into the nitty-gritty, albeit a high-level version. If it sounds
like I'm glossing important details, you're right. This discusses
only the basic DSP; precise coding, framing, sync, etc, will be in
another mail.
Vorbis is a hybrid transform domain general purpose audio encoder,
like MPEG in some respects (it is rooted in much of the same basic
theory). For the most part, the
2002 Mar 27
10
Speex: Open-source, patent-free speech coding
Hi,
We would like to announce the first release of the Speex project. Speex
(http://speex.sourceforge.net) is an open-source (LGPL), patent-free
compression format allowing an alternative to expensive proprietary
codecs. Unlike Ogg Vorbis which compresses general audio, Speex is
designed especially for speech. For that reason, Speex is meant to be a
complement to Vorbis. Since it is specialized