search for: forcely

I have a logon script for windows clients to preform net time w/my samba server when they logon. The script is called gerry.bat and it is located in the logon directory. But, when any user logs on.... The script is never called. I've attached my smb.conf file. (by the way Im running RH6.0 on an AMD K-7 w/Samba 2.0.5a. THANKS IN ADVANCE!!!! # Samba config file created using SWAT # from

I used the samba-3.0.1pre1 without problems. When I use the samba-3.0.4 (bug ms04-011 fixed), i can?t write in all shares. Is this a bug?! I use the same smb.conf [global] workgroup = jfsecco server string = JFSECCO PDC netbios name = belpo2 hosts allow = 10.18. interfaces = eth0 # Windows administrators # You can add users or groups (prefix groups with a '@') #domain admin

Thanks Elias. But I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset and: root at DC02:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters Initialising global parameters Processing section "[global]" Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[sysvol]" Processing section "[sistemas]" ldb_wrap open of idmap.ldb lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters

Hi, We've got a fairly simple samba setup (no ldap/winbind etc) and until recently everything worked fine (using samba-2.2.5). But after switching to samba-2.2.6 w2k-clients fail to run the netlogon-scripts. When i look at the client it says: logonserver=\\<workstationname> BTW. The output of "nmblookup -S CPB" (to me) seems to say that CPB is the logonserver. querying CPB

Dear Sirs, I created user account "jupiter$" and did "smbpasswd -a -m jupiter". That always worked for WinNT4, but WinXP refuses to join domain (I applied registry "requiresignorseal" hack) What do I need to add/remove from smb.conf ? I'm using FreeBSD. smb.conf is attached Regards, (????????? ?????????) Ilia Chipitsine (???? ???????) -------------- next part

Hi Marc, Am 19.03.2015 um 22:53 schrieb Marc Muehlfeld: > Am 19.03.2015 um 14:35 schrieb Nissl Reinhard: >> When I try to access share \\platon\root<file:///\\platon\root> as fee\administrator I get the following: >> >> platon:~ # smbclient -c dir -W fee -U administrator%secret //platon/root >> Domain=[FEE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba

2017-06-06 15:54 GMT-03:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:35:42 -0300 > Epsilon Minus via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi. I have a problem applying GPO. I do not know where to look >> Reviewing I found this: >> >> # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck >> lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters

Hi. I have a problem applying GPO. I do not know where to look Reviewing I found this: # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters Initialising global parameters Processing section "[global]" Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[sysvol]" Processing section "[sistemas]" ldb_wrap open of idmap.ldb Module

Hi, My name is Monenci Nicolae. I'm from Romania, an i have a problem that i could not find any answer on net. I have an "Samba version 3.013" instaled. I have atach-ed the smb.conf that i have configured my self. So my problem is: I have a network of 10 PC. (5 windows XP, 2 windows 2000, 3 windows NT) I have installed 1 new PC with windows XP. After i installed

This is my smb.conf root at DC02:~# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CLINICAGUEMES realm = CLINICAGUEMES.COM.AR netbios name = DC02 server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes ldap server require strong

> > onnect_acl_xattr: setting 'inherit acls = true' 'dos filemode = true' and > 'force unknown acl user = true' for service Unknown Service (snum == -1) > connect_acl_xattr: setting 'inherit acls = true' 'dos filemode = true' and > 'force unknown acl user = true' for service Unknown Service (snum == -1) > lp_load_ex: refreshing

Hi all, I can add my W2K machines to the Samba 3.0.5pre1 with no problems, but I can not add my XP machines. Existing XP machines work fine, but when I try to add new XP machine it does not work. Here is my smb.conf and pc from the log.smbd Thanks -Glenn [global] netbios name = HSFNP01 workgroup = MTHCS security = user os level = 64 domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes

Hi Stephan yes the imap_sieve plugin is added to the mail_plugins for imap. Thanks for the hint with mail_debug. After enabling it I can see that the program seems to be called, so filter should not be the problem. But the result is that the message appears unencrypted in my sent folder > Apr 6 08:20:26 mbox2 dovecot: imap(tobster at brain-force.ch): Debug: imapsieve: mailbox Sent: APPEND

Thank you for your response! Here comes the smb.conf… André — smb.conf — # Global parameters [global] workgroup = LOPRODUCTS realm = LOPRODUCTS.LOCAL server role = member server security = ads server string = %h server (Samba, Ubuntu) netbios name = fireball disable netbios = yes wins support = no domain master = no local master = no preferred master = no os level = 0 dns forwarder

SAMBA WEIRD PRBLEM, PLEASE HELP!!! this is my environment: SERVER runnning Centos 3.1 with all the updates applied, sharing files using samba, rpm version 3.0.4, release 6.3E Clients running Mandrake 10.0 Download edition with all the patches applied, clients to the file server mentioned above. Samba is version 3.0.2a, release 3mdk Here is my server smb.conf files **********SMB.CONF START

Hi, folks. I've got a weird situation here. I'm sure it's something small, but, well, either I've been cursed by a witch doctor, or my eyesight is getting too bad to find small problems. Either way, I'm more than willing to be pummeled for asking such a stupid question, as long as it helps me get it solved. I'm replacing an NT file server with a Samba box (hooray!).

... as in they dont appear to be forcing anymore anymore ? =) I've tried on two seperate machines, slightly different configs but same statements in the stanza I was testing... Trying to force 750/640 and it appeared to work quite nicely in the past.. No other mode statements around, and according to docs, force does a bitwire OR on the mode, no AND or masking. Still, with 750/640 forced,

> -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Heinrich > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2000 14:29 > To: 'samba@samba.org' > Subject: Browsing issues NT WS 4.0 and Samba > > Hi Guys/Girls, > > I have recently been trying to implement samba into our environment here > as a replacement for ftp clients. > > What I am finding is that windows explorer (NT W/S 4.0)

Helllo, I have clean sernet-samba-ad install, and then join to existing domain. When I tried samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset I have ERROR: [root at dc04 ~]# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[sysvol]" Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing

I just upgrade samba 3.6 to samba 4.3, folow the ubuntu 12.04 upgrade to 14.04. And I found out Samba 4 removed "force security mode" and "force directory security" from smb.conf. I don't understand why remove them, because I think they are irreplaceable. I need to keep some permission of the file or directory in the samba share and make sure them can't change by anyone