Sense Zeng
2016-May-16 09:13 UTC
[Samba] Why did samba4 remove "force security mode" and "force directory security"?
I just upgrade samba 3.6 to samba 4.3, folow the ubuntu 12.04 upgrade to 14.04. And I found out Samba 4 removed "force security mode" and "force directory security" from smb.conf. I don't understand why remove them, because I think they are irreplaceable. I need to keep some permission of the file or directory in the samba share and make sure them can't change by anyone even the file ownner. With "force security mode" and "force directory security" I can easy to do it. But in Samba 4 I can't use the same setting any more, and I can't find the instead setting in smb.conf. Could anyone tell me why "force security mode" and "force directory security" have been remove for Samba 4?
Rowland penny
2016-May-16 09:55 UTC
[Samba] Why did samba4 remove "force security mode" and "force directory security"?
On 16/05/16 10:13, Sense Zeng wrote:> I just upgrade samba 3.6 to samba 4.3, folow the ubuntu 12.04 upgrade to > 14.04. And I found out Samba 4 removed "force security mode" and "force > directory security" from smb.conf. I don't understand why remove them, > because I think they are irreplaceable. > I need to keep some permission of the file or directory in the samba share > and make sure them can't change by anyone even the file ownner. With "force > security mode" and "force directory security" I can easy to do it. But in > Samba 4 I can't use the same setting any more, and I can't find the instead > setting in smb.conf. > Could anyone tell me why "force security mode" and "force directory > security" have been remove for Samba 4?See here: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9190 Rowland
Sense Zeng
2016-May-16 14:46 UTC
[Samba] Why did samba4 remove "force security mode" and "force directory security"?
Thanks for reply. But I think "force security mode" and "force directory security" are very very helpful. It's not necessary to remove them. Maybe just a warning to the users remain that these parameters cost the acl problem, they should use them carefully.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Why did samba4 remove "force security mode" and "force directory security"?
- Need some help getting up and running: Could not request certificate: Connection refused - connect(2)
- NTLMv2 can't auth affter Win2003 update
- NTLMv2 can't auth affter Win2003 update
- Asterisk Community Participant; Katrina Refugee