search for: flow_dissector

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "flow_dissector".

2018 Dec 20
2
4.20-rc6: WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect
...> Folks, > > >> > > >> I got this warning today. I cant tell when and why this happened, so I do not know yet how to reproduce. > > >> Maybe someone has a quick idea. > > >> > > >> [85109.572032] WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect+0x1f0/0x1318 > > > > > > I managed to trigger this warning as well the other day, but from a > > > different call path: > > > > FWIW, it also seems to happen on 4.20-rc1. 4.19.0 seems fine. bisect seem to have failed so > > my re...
2018 Dec 20
2
4.20-rc6: WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect
...> Folks, > > >> > > >> I got this warning today. I cant tell when and why this happened, so I do not know yet how to reproduce. > > >> Maybe someone has a quick idea. > > >> > > >> [85109.572032] WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect+0x1f0/0x1318 > > > > > > I managed to trigger this warning as well the other day, but from a > > > different call path: > > > > FWIW, it also seems to happen on 4.20-rc1. 4.19.0 seems fine. bisect seem to have failed so > > my re...
2018 Dec 21
0
4.20-rc6: WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect
..., >>>>> >>>>> I got this warning today. I cant tell when and why this happened, so I do not know yet how to reproduce. >>>>> Maybe someone has a quick idea. >>>>> >>>>> [85109.572032] WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect+0x1f0/0x1318 >>>> >>>> I managed to trigger this warning as well the other day, but from a >>>> different call path: >>> >>> FWIW, it also seems to happen on 4.20-rc1. 4.19.0 seems fine. bisect seem to have failed so &gt...
2018 Dec 20
0
4.20-rc6: WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect
Folks, I got this warning today. I cant tell when and why this happened, so I do not know yet how to reproduce. Maybe someone has a quick idea. [85109.572032] WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect+0x1f0/0x1318 [85109.572036] Modules linked in: vhost_net vhost macvtap macvlan tap vfio_ap vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 vfio kvm xt_CHECKSUM ipt_MASQUERADE tun bridge stp llc xt_tcpudp ip6t_rpfilter ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_conntrack ip6tab...
2018 Dec 20
0
4.20-rc6: WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect
...0AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > Folks, > > > > I got this warning today. I cant tell when and why this happened, so I do not know yet how to reproduce. > > Maybe someone has a quick idea. > > > > [85109.572032] WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect+0x1f0/0x1318 > > I managed to trigger this warning as well the other day, but from a > different call path: > > [280155.348610] fib_multipath_hash+0x28c/0x2d0 > [280155.348613] ? fib_multipath_hash+0x28c/0x2d0 > [280155.348619] fib_select_path+0x241/...
2018 Dec 20
0
4.20-rc6: WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect
...8:45:40AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> Folks, >> >> I got this warning today. I cant tell when and why this happened, so I do not know yet how to reproduce. >> Maybe someone has a quick idea. >> >> [85109.572032] WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect+0x1f0/0x1318 > > I managed to trigger this warning as well the other day, but from a > different call path: FWIW, it also seems to happen on 4.20-rc1. 4.19.0 seems fine. bisect seem to have failed so my reproducer is not reliable. > > [280155.348526] WARN...
2018 Dec 20
1
4.20-rc6: WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect
...Folks, > > > > > > > > I got this warning today. I cant tell when and why this happened, so I do not know yet how to reproduce. > > > > Maybe someone has a quick idea. > > > > > > > > [85109.572032] WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 197360 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:764 __skb_flow_dissect+0x1f0/0x1318 > > > > > > I managed to trigger this warning as well the other day, but from a > > > different call path: > > > > > > [280155.348610] fib_multipath_hash+0x28c/0x2d0 > > > [280155.348613] ? fib_multipath_h...
2023 May 09
5
[Bridge] [RFC PATCH net-next 0/5] Add layer 2 miss indication and filtering
...encountered a miss. The new bit is added in an existing hole in the skb in order not to inflate this data structure. Patch #2 extends the flower classifier to be able to match on the new layer 2 miss metadata. Patch #3 rejects matching on the new metadata in drivers that already support the 'FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META' key. Patch #4 extends mlxsw to be able to match on layer 2 miss. Patch #5 adds a selftest. iproute2 patches can be found here [3]. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7432#section-8.3 [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7432#section-8.5 [3] https://github.com/ido...
2023 May 18
5
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 0/5] Add layer 2 miss indication and filtering
...encountered a miss. The new bit is added in an existing hole in the skb in order not to inflate this data structure. Patch #2 extends the flower classifier to be able to match on the new layer 2 miss metadata. Patch #3 rejects matching on the new metadata in drivers that already support the 'FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META' key. Patch #4 extends mlxsw to be able to match on layer 2 miss. Patch #5 adds a selftest. iproute2 patches can be found here [3]. Changelog ========= Since RFC [4]: No changes. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7432#section-8.3 [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/h...
2023 May 23
3
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
...ic key, so overhead is kept to a minimum when feature is disabled. Extended flower to enable / disable this key when filters that match on 'l2_miss' are added / removed. bridge change to mark the packet: https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/3fab206492fcad9177f2340680f02ced1b9a0dec.patch flow_dissector change to dissect the info from the extension: https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/1533c078b02586547817a4e63989a0db62aa5315.patch flower change to enable / disable the key: https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/cf84b277511ec80fe565c41271abc6b2e2f629af.patch Advantages compared to the previous...
2023 May 19
1
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
On Fri, 19 May 2023 16:51:48 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote: > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c > index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c > @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb) > */ > br_switchdev_frame_unmark(skb); > > + skb->l2_miss
2023 May 23
1
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
...nimum when feature is disabled. > Extended flower to enable / disable this key when filters that match on > 'l2_miss' are added / removed. > > bridge change to mark the packet: > https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/3fab206492fcad9177f2340680f02ced1b9a0dec.patch > > flow_dissector change to dissect the info from the extension: > https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/1533c078b02586547817a4e63989a0db62aa5315.patch > > flower change to enable / disable the key: > https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/cf84b277511ec80fe565c41271abc6b2e2f629af.patch > > Advan...
2014 Dec 03
1
tinc vpn: adding dscp passthrough (priorityinherit), ecn, and fq_codel support
...of useful information stored there in any coherent way, (it's too bad that the vxlan stuff added a prepended header, instead of just using the flowlabel) so it is best to just hash the main headers and whatever inner headers you can obtain, as per http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/core/flow_dissector.c#L54 and https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c#L70 I have quibble with the jhash3 here, as the present treatment of ipv6 is the very efficient but not very hashy addr[0] ^ addr[2] ^ addr[3] ^ addr[4] (somewhere in the code), instead of feeding all the bits to t...
2014 Dec 03
3
tinc vpn: adding dscp passthrough (priorityinherit), ecn, and fq_codel support
I have long included tinc in the cerowrt project as a lighter weight, meshy alternative to conventional vpns. I sat down a few days ago to think about how to make vpn connections work better through fq_codel, and decided I should maybe hack on a vpn to do the job. So I picked up tinc's source code for the first time, got it working on IPv6 as a switch in a matter of minutes between two