Ido Schimmel
2023-May-19 13:51 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:08:47PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:> On 18/05/2023 14:33, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c > > index fc17b9fd93e6..d8ab5890cbe6 100644 > > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c > > @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb) > > return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED; > > > > memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(struct br_input_skb_cb)); > > + skb->l2_miss = 0; > > > > p = br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev); > > if (p->flags & BR_VLAN_TUNNEL) > > Overall looks good, only this part is a bit worrisome and needs some additional > investigation because now we'll unconditionally dirty a cache line for every > packet that is forwarded. Could you please check the effect with perf?To eliminate it I tried the approach we discussed yesterday: First, add the miss indication to the bridge's control block which is zeroed for every skb entering the bridge: diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h index 2119729ded2b..bd5c18286a40 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ struct br_input_skb_cb { #endif u8 proxyarp_replied:1; u8 src_port_isolated:1; + u8 miss:1; /* FDB or MDB lookup miss */ #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING u8 vlan_filtered:1; #endif And set this bit upon misses instead of skb->l2_miss: @@ -203,6 +205,8 @@ void br_flood(struct net_bridge *br, struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_bridge_port *prev = NULL; struct net_bridge_port *p; + BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss = 1; + list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, &br->port_list, list) { /* Do not flood unicast traffic to ports that turn it off, nor * other traffic if flood off, except for traffic we originate @@ -295,6 +299,7 @@ void br_multicast_flood(struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mdst, allow_mode_include = false; } else { p = NULL; + BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss = 1; } while (p || rp) { Then copy it to skb->l2_miss at the very end where the cache line containing this field is already written to: diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c index 84d6dd5e5b1a..89f65564e338 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb br_switchdev_frame_set_offload_fwd_mark(skb); + skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss; + dev_queue_xmit(skb); return 0; Also for locally received packets: diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb) */ br_switchdev_frame_unmark(skb); + skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss; + /* Bridge is just like any other port. Make sure the * packet is allowed except in promisc mode when someone * may be running packet capture. Ran these changes through the selftest and it seems to work. WDYT?
Jakub Kicinski
2023-May-19 21:52 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
On Fri, 19 May 2023 16:51:48 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote:> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c > index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c > @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb) > */ > br_switchdev_frame_unmark(skb); > > + skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss; > + > /* Bridge is just like any other port. Make sure the > * packet is allowed except in promisc mode when someone > * may be running packet capture. > > Ran these changes through the selftest and it seems to work.Can we possibly put the new field at the end of the CB and then have TC look at it in the CB? We already do a bit of such CB juggling in strp (first member of struct sk_skb_cb).
Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-May-21 07:34 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
On 19/05/2023 16:51, Ido Schimmel wrote:> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:08:47PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: >> On 18/05/2023 14:33, Ido Schimmel wrote: >>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c >>> index fc17b9fd93e6..d8ab5890cbe6 100644 >>> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c >>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c >>> @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb) >>> return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED; >>> >>> memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(struct br_input_skb_cb)); >>> + skb->l2_miss = 0; >>> >>> p = br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev); >>> if (p->flags & BR_VLAN_TUNNEL) >> >> Overall looks good, only this part is a bit worrisome and needs some additional >> investigation because now we'll unconditionally dirty a cache line for every >> packet that is forwarded. Could you please check the effect with perf? > > To eliminate it I tried the approach we discussed yesterday: > > First, add the miss indication to the bridge's control block which is > zeroed for every skb entering the bridge: > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h > index 2119729ded2b..bd5c18286a40 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h > +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h > @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ struct br_input_skb_cb { > #endif > u8 proxyarp_replied:1; > u8 src_port_isolated:1; > + u8 miss:1; /* FDB or MDB lookup miss */ > #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING > u8 vlan_filtered:1; > #endif > > And set this bit upon misses instead of skb->l2_miss: > > @@ -203,6 +205,8 @@ void br_flood(struct net_bridge *br, struct sk_buff *skb, > struct net_bridge_port *prev = NULL; > struct net_bridge_port *p; > > + BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss = 1; > + > list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, &br->port_list, list) { > /* Do not flood unicast traffic to ports that turn it off, nor > * other traffic if flood off, except for traffic we originate > @@ -295,6 +299,7 @@ void br_multicast_flood(struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mdst, > allow_mode_include = false; > } else { > p = NULL; > + BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss = 1; > } > > while (p || rp) { > > Then copy it to skb->l2_miss at the very end where the cache line > containing this field is already written to: > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c > index 84d6dd5e5b1a..89f65564e338 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c > @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb > > br_switchdev_frame_set_offload_fwd_mark(skb); > > + skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss; > + > dev_queue_xmit(skb); > > return 0; > > Also for locally received packets: > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c > index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c > @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb) > */ > br_switchdev_frame_unmark(skb); > > + skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss; > + > /* Bridge is just like any other port. Make sure the > * packet is allowed except in promisc mode when someone > * may be running packet capture. > > Ran these changes through the selftest and it seems to work. > > WDYT?Looks good to me, this is what I had in mind wrt cache line dirtying. The swdev mark already does it, so putting them together is nice. From bridge POV this is good. Thanks, Nik
Maybe Matching Threads
- [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
- [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
- [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
- [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 0/5] Add layer 2 miss indication and filtering
- [Bridge] [RFC PATCH net-next 0/5] Add layer 2 miss indication and filtering