Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "flippanc".
Did you mean:
flippant
2019 Mar 15
0
Just stop it with the "Domain Admins" nonsense
...evident, or the wiki wouldn't have been written in
the way it is.
>HOWEVER, "upon reflection" the tone of the message was wrong, and I
>apologise for it.
Apology accepted ;-)
>I acknowledge the
> great work the people in this list do, and you deserve thanks, not
> flippancy. I would suggest that for large organisations using "domain
> admin" accounts for day to day configuring/administering on member
> servers is not common. Usually a local admin would be used, or more
> commonly a domain user account is given admin privileges.
A local admin would...
2019 Mar 14
2
Just stop it with the "Domain Admins" nonsense
Its littered throughout the docs eg..
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs
At best its *poor practice* which should not be frowned upon, but it just
shows a real disconnect with real world users and systems, where admins are
not "Domain Admins".
2011 May 20
3
PC EU feedback: ability to remove all unmanaged resources
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7600
I call this the "agent orange" option :)
This works, purging all unmanaged hosts entries:
resources { ''host'':
purge => true,
noop => true,
}
We should have a similar property for all (most?) types.
Please comment on the ticket or reply here, whichever you prefer.
Thanks!
r
P.S. This is in
2008 May 21
32
Rack, Camping 2.0++
===
1. Camping on Rack
===
I''ve just finished rewriting Camping to use Rack in the "core". I got rid of
(a little less) than 1kB in camping.rb and removed lots of un-necessary files
(lib/server/*.rb, fastcgi.rb & mongrel.rb).
bin/camping does now only provide WEBrick, Mongrel and console-support and
should only be used in development. It uses Rack::ShowExceptions to catch