search for: flippant

...is not just a ogg multiplex file, but a file > with linguistic content that will typically be used by linguistic > applications"), then you should totally invent your own mime and file > type (e.g. application/ogg+linguistic and .ogl). It's your choice. :) > I was trying to be flippant, and maybe not succeeding. Hopefully, others working in the linguistic areas will find ALingA useful, and ogl will emerge as a new type without requiring too much from me. Regards, Elaine

...regard. Actually, I'm not sure it > would make sense for Microsoft to develop a new version of DOS. > Although, I did hear something about a new completely different > Command Line in Windows Vista, but I doubt that would be affected by > 8.3 limits. > That's me being very flippant, I'm talking about Vista. Lots of talk about rewritten codebases, NTFS and this new database thing replacing FAT, but if it still uses .ext style extensions to tell it and the user what's in a file then there's an important legacy aspect still stuck there[1]. Twelve years after Window...

I have two/three PPTP servers on my network and each one of them are on their own subnet and I want to be able to send traffic to each and everyone. My rules file entry is as follows DNAT net loc:1.1.1.1 tcp 1723 DNAT net loc:1.1.1.1 47 and DNAT net loc:2.2.2.2 tcp 1723 DNAT net loc:2.2.2.2 47 however all the traffic only goes to 1.1.1.1 because its the first DNAT entry. I tried the

> Yes, if you define "same pointer" as "pointers with the same bitwise representation". Yes, this is the definition I was interested in, under the assumption that it's the definition LLVM uses. But it sounds like you've augmented LLVM so that bitwise-identical pointer values are not considered equal if they come from different allocations. In that case, I don't

On Wednesday 04 October 2017 12:54:44 Mark Haney wrote: > Sorry, but if you have to use packages that don't originate from CentOS > and they do that, then I wouldn't use them. Period.? I'd compile from > source before I used something configured that way. This perspective to some extent employs cutting your nose of dispite youre face. Before Packages were introduced,

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Aslak Helles?y <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com>wrote: > When (if) this thread ends, let''s start a discussion about indentation > conventions! > Oh... let the pleasure be mine!... and why wait? _EVERYONE_ knows that the only way to indent ruby code is 2 plain spaces. Tabs are known to be the source of all evil and 4 spaces obviously wastes

...count and 145 lines of crap could have been removed from your recent post. This is getting a bit ridiculous, Valeri: https://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp/ListInfo Fourth item, top section "CentOS Mailing Lists and Posting Guidelines" Note: do not reply privately to me with yet another flippant reply; please read and adhere to the published guidelines for this and other centos.org mailing lists. John -- Everybody should fear only one person, and that person should be himself. -- Philip Jose? Farmer (1918-2009), American author, The Magic Labyrinth (1980), opening lines --...

Hello everyone, I have programmed a function and, among other things, it has to compute the differential of a function. I have been using the function grad() and I have programmed some simulated studies. I have testes with 72,576 different combinations of the initial values and now I got an error in only 4 situations. The error comes from the function grad() and I don't understand why. This

Dear all, Is there any standard statistical terminology describing the points beyond a confidence region? Obviously, the "outlier" is improper here. Please help me if you happens have the info. Thanks you very much for your kindly help. Best wishes, Zhiqiu [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

This has been a fascinating discussion. Carl Boettinger replied with a set of examples where the world is much more fragile than my examples. That was useful. It seems that people in my area (medical research and survival) are more careful with their packages (whew!). Gabor Csardi discussed the problems with maintaining a package with lots of dependencies. I maintain the survival package

...y 'qualified' (and even that is subject to doubt) person there, or your management is too ignorant to understand the danger.? I'm sorry, but in no way is this acceptable for production level servers. I'm sure, if you asked 100 IT people you'd get 100 to agree with me.? Being flippant with production servers is never acceptable. Of course, most people refuse to listen to logic and reason because they are convinced they are right despite evidence (and best practices over 40+ years of Unix) to the contrary. I'll end this by saying, I hope the production servers you have d...

...ng now. >> I'm not, I just put up with it :) > ... > I think it's very valuable that we have one shared build system. If you'd like to check in GN files, my strong preference would be to accompany that with a plan to phase cmake out. > > I really don't mean to be flippant here -- I'm in awe of the work you've already done to set up GN files, and I know transitioning away from cmake would be a massive amount of work. Hear me out :) > > My perspective comes from having worked on lldb for a while. lldb has two build systems (xcodebuild & cmake). I sup...

My R crashes frequently when run with huge data. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/R-crashes-tp26110355p26110355.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...here, or your > management is too ignorant to understand the danger. How is compiling your own packages not a danger? > I'm sorry, but in no way is this acceptable for production level > servers. I'm sure, if you asked 100 IT people you'd get 100 to agree > with me.? Being flippant with production servers is never acceptable. Then you have to agree that defaulting to using a ramdisk for /var/run --- or anything else --- is an utterly stupid idea. > Of course, most people refuse to listen to logic and reason because > they are convinced they are right despite evidence...

Proposal: An extension to rules all others Copyright Notice None. Public Domain. Abstract Extension flamewars surrounding media formats inside Ogg containers are a pain in the behind, cause problems in the adoption of said formats, and confuse users. This modest proposal directed at the maintainers of Vorbis, Theora, Speex and FLAC will suggest a solution to solve these issues (and others).

Proposal: An extension to rules all others Copyright Notice None. Public Domain. Abstract Extension flamewars surrounding media formats inside Ogg containers are a pain in the behind, cause problems in the adoption of said formats, and confuse users. This modest proposal directed at the maintainers of Vorbis, Theora, Speex and FLAC will suggest a solution to solve these issues (and others).

Proposal: An extension to rules all others Copyright Notice None. Public Domain. Abstract Extension flamewars surrounding media formats inside Ogg containers are a pain in the behind, cause problems in the adoption of said formats, and confuse users. This modest proposal directed at the maintainers of Vorbis, Theora, Speex and FLAC will suggest a solution to solve these issues (and others).

Proposal: An extension to rules all others Copyright Notice None. Public Domain. Abstract Extension flamewars surrounding media formats inside Ogg containers are a pain in the behind, cause problems in the adoption of said formats, and confuse users. This modest proposal directed at the maintainers of Vorbis, Theora, Speex and FLAC will suggest a solution to solve these issues (and others).

Proposal: An extension to rules all others Copyright Notice None. Public Domain. Abstract Extension flamewars surrounding media formats inside Ogg containers are a pain in the behind, cause problems in the adoption of said formats, and confuse users. This modest proposal directed at the maintainers of Vorbis, Theora, Speex and FLAC will suggest a solution to solve these issues (and others).

Hi I am performing an analysis of variance with two factors, each with two levels. I have differing numbers of observations in each of the four combinations, but all four combinations *are* present (2 of the factor combinations have 3 observations, 1 has 4 and 1 has 5) I have used both anova(aov(...)) and anova(lm(...)) in R and it gave the same result - as expected. I then plugged this into