Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "flinching".
Did you mean:
flicking
2006 Nov 01
0
No subject
...ect, CCNA
> Coremetrics, Inc.
> Phone: 512-698-7250
> email: austin at coremetrics.com
>=20
> "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and
> try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger.
> But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will=20
> reduce the danger by half."
> Sir Winston Churchill
--=20
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin at coremetrics.com
"One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and=20
try to run away from it. If yo...
2006 Nov 01
0
No subject
...hitect, CCNA
> Coremetrics, Inc.
> Phone: 512-698-7250
> email: austin at coremetrics.com
>
> "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and
> try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger.
> But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will
> reduce the danger by half."
> Sir Winston Churchill
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin at coremetrics.com
"One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and
try to run away from it. If you do that...
2006 Nov 01
0
No subject
..., CCNA
> Coremetrics, Inc.
> Phone: 512-698-7250
> email: austin at coremetrics.com
>=20
> "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and=20
> try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger.
> But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will=20
> reduce the danger by half."
> Sir Winston Churchill
--=20
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin at coremetrics.com
"One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and=20
try to run away from it. If yo...
2002 May 31
11
(no subject)X-forward
...ev
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin at coremetrics.com
"One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and
try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger.
But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will
reduce the danger by half."
Sir Winston Churchill
2002 May 09
4
Feature request: Discussion.
...--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin at coremetrics.com
"One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and
try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger.
But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will
reduce the danger by half."
Sir Winston Churchill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/...
2002 May 17
1
OpenSSH 3.2.2 supports kerberos5 but....
....
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin at coremetrics.com
"One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and
try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger.
But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will
reduce the danger by half."
Sir Winston Churchill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/...
2002 May 31
1
(no subject)
Hello,
I've got the Problem that the Display Variable is not set when I connect
to sshd.
X-Forward is active.
I think I tested all Configurations but it doesn't work.
Sorry :-)
Solaris 8 openssh 3.2.3
Andreas Kerl
2002 May 17
1
[Bug 248] New: scp doesn't support ssh2 protocol
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
Summary: scp doesn't support ssh2 protocol
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: scp
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: liug
2002 May 28
5
chroot patch
Hello everyone,
In response to emails such as the one below I have started a sourceforge site for this patch. If your chuckling to yourself at the thought of a sourceforge site over a patch, well, I did too when I first thought of it. I don't have the bandwidth requirements at home to host it and Harvard Law School doesn't want to host the patch for me either.
Please check out
1999 Feb 24
2
Compiling R on Sunos
I'm looking for some help in getting R to compile on Sunos. We run a
collection of Sunos and Solaris machines in the department here. I got
to compile on Solaris 2.5.1 using gcc 2.7.2.2. On my Sunos 4.1.3 (and
I've tried it on Sunos 4.1.4 as well) machines, it crashes during the
compile. I'm using gcc 2.8.1 on there. It gets to this point:
gcc -g -O2 -I../include
2002 May 22
3
Openssh still logs in while passwd is locked
>Using OpenSSH 3.1p1 on a Sun Solaris 7 box, I disabled an account using the
>'passwd -l ...' command to lock the users password. However, the user can
>still access the system via ssh. Whilst I could do other things such as
>moving their .ssh directory, removing their account home directory, etc,
>etc, is there some 'nicer' way to inform ssh that the account is now
2002 May 15
3
Curious about final KRB5/GSSAPI patch inclusion.
...A.
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin at coremetrics.com
"One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and
try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger.
But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will
reduce the danger by half."
Sir Winston Churchill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/...
2007 Jan 16
2
[LLVMdev] OK, how does this work?
On Tue, 2007-16-01 at 02:50 +0000, Reid Spencer wrote:
> > The build instructions provided tell me to build llvm-gcc first from
> > the source.
> > The source for that tells me to build llvm first from the source. I'm
> > not sure where to go from this point.
> You should build llvm first, then llvm-gcc.
When I build LLVM first, however, I get told that it
2007 Sep 13
26
hardware sizing for a zfs-based system?
Hi all,
I''m putting together a OpenSolaris ZFS-based system and need help
picking hardware.
I''m thinking about using this 26-disk case: [FYI: 2-disk RAID1 for the
OS & 4*(4+2) RAIDZ2 for SAN]
http://rackmountpro.com/productpage.php?prodid=2418
Regarding the mobo, cpus, and memory - I searched goggle and the ZFS
site and all I came up with so far is that, for a
2007 Sep 13
26
hardware sizing for a zfs-based system?
Hi all,
I''m putting together a OpenSolaris ZFS-based system and need help
picking hardware.
I''m thinking about using this 26-disk case: [FYI: 2-disk RAID1 for the
OS & 4*(4+2) RAIDZ2 for SAN]
http://rackmountpro.com/productpage.php?prodid=2418
Regarding the mobo, cpus, and memory - I searched goggle and the ZFS
site and all I came up with so far is that, for a
2007 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] OK, how does this work?
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:24 +0800, Michael T. Richter wrote:
> I'm trying to get LLVM1.9 working on my Ubuntu 6.10 system. The LLVM
> version in the repositories is 1.7 and I've never managed to get it
> successfully working because whoever packaged it thought it would be
> fun to rename everything. This means I can't use it to build 1.9 and
> I've
2007 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] OK, how does this work?
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:13 +0800, Michael T. Richter wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-16-01 at 02:50 +0000, Reid Spencer wrote:
> > > The build instructions provided tell me to build llvm-gcc first from
> > > the source.
> > > The source for that tells me to build llvm first from the source. I'm
> > > not sure where to go from this point.
>
2007 Jan 16
3
[LLVMdev] OK, how does this work?
I'm trying to get LLVM1.9 working on my Ubuntu 6.10 system. The LLVM
version in the repositories is 1.7 and I've never managed to get it
successfully working because whoever packaged it thought it would be fun
to rename everything. This means I can't use it to build 1.9 and I've
therefore decided to try bootstrapping a 1.9 build.
Yes, I've looked at the docs where it said