search for: flank

...on: I imported a data set ("freqg") into R consisting of 14 variables. Now a want to compute a variable and add it in an additional column to my data frame. The value of this new variable ("condition") depends on the values of two other variables ("mat" and "flank") already included in the data frame. For example: if mat=1 and flank=1 -> condition=1 if mat=2 and flank=1 -> condition=2 ... What I got is this code, which doesn't really work (it results in a new column called "condition" which takes only the value "TRUE")...

...s gracias #############################################################• # Ojo este script puede instalarte librerias que no quieres if(!require(ez)){ install.packages("ez") } require(ez) data(ANT) ANT$Factor <-# Crear el factor para quitar los outliers interaction(ANT$cue, ANT$flank, ANT$location) y <- ANT$rt # save original data x <- # save non outliers by condition by( data= ANT ,INDICES= ANT$Factor,FUN= function(x){ print(x$Factor[1]) if(length( x[ abs(scale(x$rt))> qnorm(0.975) & !is.na(x$rt) , ]$rt ) > 1){ x[ abs(scale(x$rt))> qnorm(0...

Dear list, I am importing data consisting of numbers into dataframes. Some of the numbers are flanked by parentheses or square brackets. Thus, they are not recognized as numeric and the corresponding column is of class "factor" which makes it hard/impossible use in plotting functions. Is there a way to remove brackets from numbers in a column/row/dataframe? Kind regards, Stefan -- V...

Full_Name: Mike Lawrence Version: 2.9.0 OS: OS 10.5.7 Submission from: (NULL) (208.98.203.100) When using save() I notice that sometimes saving smaller objects yield larger file sizes. x=data.frame( expand.grid( id=factor(1:1000) ,trial=1:24 ,cue=factor(1:3) ,flank=factor(1:4) ) ) save(x,file='temp1.Rdata') #about 20KB y=x[x$id!='1',] save(y,file='temp2.Rdata') #>500KB

...otation you use) The function described in the source code comment (window.c, line 29) is: y=sin(sin(x)*sin(x)*2pi) And at last, the function actually implemented in libvorbis, (window.c, lines 33-38) is: y=sin(sin(x/n*PI/2)^2*PI/2) In the implementation, this is the calcuation of the leading flank, where x is running from 0 (y=0) to n, where n is the end of the flank (y=1). <p><p>=================================================================== EASY and FREE access to your email anywhere: http://Mailreader.com/ ==================================================================...

...Process Level 2 A_51_P100034 NM_027162.3 MIF4G-likes type 3,MIF4-likes type 1/2/3 EIF4G DOMAIN PROTEIN,AD023 PROTEIN Protein metabolism and modification Protein biosynthesis A_51_P100052 NM_198863.1 Leucine-rich repeats typical subtype,Leucine-rich repeat,Leucine-rich repeats cysteine-rich flanking regions N-terminal,Cysteine-rich flanking regions C-terminal LEUCINE-RICH TRANSMEMBRANE PROTEINS Biological process unclassified - A_51_P100174 NM_008613.2 - MEIOSIS-SPECIFIC NUCLEAR STRUCTURAL PROTEIN 1 Developmental processes Meiosis A_51_P100218 NM_134198.1 Vomeronasal receptors t...

...mode in order to ream off the relevant fortran libs and object files so that cc can replicate them during linking. The fortran compiler in Forte 9 now includes the directive "-lompstubs", which for some reason is placed out of order for the linker. The forte compiler works around this by flanking the lib call with -zallextract and -zdefaultextract, effectively forcing the linker to extract all symbols in the ompstubs library so that they're available for later libraries. The configure script is ignoring the -z extraction directives, resulting in an out-of-order sequence of libs, and...

Hello R Masters and the Rest of Us: The first of these works fine, the 2nd is accepted but too literal (the "%->%" is shown in the plot label and in the wrong position). The 3rd throws and error due to "unexpected SPECIAL". Would someone recommend a way to format this? I want the two phrases connected by a right arrow. TIA, these things always elude me. Bryan

I'm making a request for comments in an effort to bring a minor but nagging bug to some kind of multilaterally-beneficial conclusion, and deliberately held off until after the 1.0 release in case this turns out to be a bigger deal than originally anticipated. http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13517 The first proposed suggestion is that a more consistent method for handling the

hello every one, How to function more than one loop in R? I have the following problem to be solved with the a method of three loops, can you help me please? The data is attached with this message. The data is composed of two parts, cleaved (denoted by ?cleaved?) and non cleaved (denoted by ?noncleaved?). ? to access to the ith peptide, you can use X$Peptide[i] ? to access to the ith label,

Jeff, Perhaps I was sloppy with my notation: I want groups >=0 <10 >=10 <20 >=20<30 ...... >=90 <100 In any event, my question remains, why did the four different versions of cut give me the same results? I hope someone can explain to me the function of include.lowest and right in the call to cut. As demonstrated in my example below, the parameters do not seem to alter