search for: flamewar

Wow, I think that was the first really potent flamewar we've had on llvmdev. Looking on the positive side, I think this shows that the llvm community is growing and drawing interest from new people with new perspectives. This is a good thing. I want to thank everyone who was courteous in their response. As others have said, it is really imp...

My manager was just asking me if it's out - he's just gotten a large number of updates on one of our systems, just now. Please note this is NOT INTENDED TO START ANOTHER IDIOT FLAMEWAR; I'm just asking for a clarification, given that I don't see anything on the CentOS site. mark mark

...e. Like Windows 95. > > Mailing lists now are so full of children it's hard to even use them. > Maybe you should leave IT if heated discussions make you uncomfortable. Folks, I'm the one who made the original annoyed throwaway remark. I've even asked that we end the incipient flamewar. Look, as much as I dislike systemd, going on and on and on just ain't of interest. Hell, I'll probably skim and delete, or just delete. Now, the information that someone posted about what might be happening to cause my original question was helpful, and in *that* context, in the same emai...

...ces can't _all_ be in my head, I hope! OK, I should at least _try_ to be objective. In contrast to the other VCSs I've used: - Perforce _just works_. By this I mean that it only ever takes effort to make it work _differently_, not to make it work _at all_. I don't want to start a flamewar and so won't mention other VCSs that could be contrasted here, but the differences are certainly there. Getting up and running - Perforce is _very_ well documented. - Perforce is _very_ well supported: should anyone ever need help, Perforce support is incredibly helpful, polite and _eeri...

When I use option t and m together in the same dial statement the music on hold doesn't appear to work. Is this a normal operation? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040203/bfdd6806/attachment.htm

I think we had enough of Systemd flaming last month. Please stop polluting my inbox and find an operating system compatible with your worldview. It is really tiresome to keep on hearing about it. On 8 June 2017 at 14:51, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > Upstream 6 uses systemd? >>>> >>>>

...pensive operations (log, annotate, bisecting, etc) are performed locally. There is a git mirror that works quite well, but there is no bazaar mirror and it is impossible to create one due to the measures taken for preventing svn server abuse. I'm not going to start a technical discussion (aka flamewar) comparing git and bzr. I hope it is enough to say that some of us prefer bzr to git and mostly want to avoid using git on Windows. So I'm asking to the powers that be some collaboration, either for mirroring themselves the llvm repos (llvm, clang, maybe gcc too), or for whitelisting some mach...

...bisecting, etc) are performed locally. > > There is a git mirror that works quite well, but there is no bazaar > mirror and it is impossible to create one due to the measures taken > for > preventing svn server abuse. > > I'm not going to start a technical discussion (aka flamewar) comparing > git and bzr. I hope it is enough to say that some of us prefer bzr to > git and mostly want to avoid using git on Windows. > > So I'm asking to the powers that be some collaboration, either for > mirroring themselves the llvm repos (llvm, clang, maybe gcc too), or...

...even if just for iterator comparison) after an erase() or similar on that collection has invalidated all iterators These assertions can occur in both debug and release configurations (Microsoft includes certain assertions in the release runtime for "security"). I do *not* want to start a flamewar on the subject of who is right in this conflict. The Microsoft STL simply assert-fails on things that are officially undefined in the spec for the STL (as a matter of policy), and LLVM just relies on certain pieces of undefined behavior that are typically benign in most implementations. I'd be...

Dear Experts, After one of updates that was released some time ago (a Month ago or maybe even earlier) I have noticed the following. On the machines with default runlevel 5 (sorry about old terminology, the new one is still confusing for me ;-) GUI/X11 login (display manager) lists only users whose default shell is bash. Or, at least users whose default shell is tcsh are not listed at all, and if

I was wondering if there was an elegant way to extend a require array. To whit it would be wonderful to do somthing like this: class one { service { awesome: require => [ File[one], File[two] ] } file { one: ... two: ... } } class two inherits one { Service[awesome] { Require => + [ File[three], File[four] ] } file { three: ... four:

Hello list. No intention to start a flamewar here but I would really like opinions from those who know both the Cisco and Asterisk system. I'm working for a company with 15 offices in 11 countries, offices are relatively small (3-20 people each) and most of them have a Cisco 1760 Router installed with Call manager express (CME) and 1...

...in Java. And that there was some wondering why none of the programs like GetRight or other download assistant programs support rsync. My only thought is that maybe there needs to be a librsync released under LGPL, like zlib and other such libraries. By no means do I wish to turn this into a flamewar or a politics convention, and I haven't even subscribed to this mailing list. I should admit that I have a commercial interest in this venture, as I am looking to [potentially] provide rsync access to various businesses for the purpose of backup (as opposed to say FTP or SCP), and am in ne...

...; I just wonder: does RedHat (CentOS's upstream vendor) dislike and is >> willing to eradicate all shells except for bash, or what I see is just >> my >> own pilot's error? >> > > Just for future advise.. for someone who says they don't want to start > a flamewar.. you worded that pretty much like you wanted to start a > flame war. Thanks a lot! Well, not flamewar about different shells, but some acid about something that broke on enterprise kind of system somewhere in the middle of its life cycle. Well, "nothing changed" apart from installati...

Ok, folks, I have not followed this thread since the first few emails... but has anyone suggested the SCL repo? I see mysql 5.6 and 5.7 there. mark "this is not the flamewar I'm looking for. I'll move along...."

Dear All, I am given some noisy data which (by naked eye) appears to be oscillating first but finally growing. Is there any statistical set (I mean something different from e.g. a linear fit, which would not be convincing at all in my case) to detect growth (possibly without relying on any data fitting)? Many thanks Lorenzo

...uld have said at the start that i've just co-ordinated an NBX install for a much larger project and that part of my current investigations is simply to see at what point * is more appropriate (in terms of cost, effort, reliability, flexibility) than NBX/CCME et al. Not intending to start a flamewar on the subject at this point -- there are MANY variables to consider!) thanks again, and I expect there will be more questions soon! regards - d

Hi All, First post here. I am dialing out via call file to remote number, when call is connected a local number is dialed. And on success both calls get bridged and works fine. This is a parallel auto dialout application. I want to set a variable as soon as the local number answers the call, so that system won't try to dialout that local number again and stops further dialing. What should be

...g>? Responder 1: Look at <solution1>. Responder 2: Look at <solution2>. Responder 3: Look at <solution3>. Responder 4: It doesn't work for me / I don't like that / it's a stupid solution / etc <conversation degenerates and/or flamewar ensues> There's nothing wrong with comparing / contrasting different solutions, but can we please try to remember that every circumstance is different and that just because someone suggests a solution it doesn't mean that it's the best for everyone? Ultimately, only the OP will be...

Well after I tried it the ./configure on all machines ( 4 total) I ran a few other compiles of other programs and figured out what was missing. Evidently the RH62 kernel "forgets" to put a symlink from /usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386 --> asm. I put that in and presto ./configure creates the Makefile and I am compiling 2.0.7Pre2 as we speak. What keyed this was trying a kernel compile,