search for: flamewars

Wow, I think that was the first really potent flamewar we've had on llvmdev. Looking on the positive side, I think this shows that the llvm community is growing and drawing interest from new people with new perspectives. This is a good thing. I want to thank everyone who was courteous in their response. As others have said, it is really important to be polite and try to be

My manager was just asking me if it's out - he's just gotten a large number of updates on one of our systems, just now. Please note this is NOT INTENDED TO START ANOTHER IDIOT FLAMEWAR; I'm just asking for a clarification, given that I don't see anything on the CentOS site. mark mark

Mark Haney wrote: > On 06/08/2017 09:12 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: >> I think we had enough of Systemd flaming last month. Please stop >> polluting my inbox and find an operating system compatible with your >> worldview. It is really tiresome to keep on hearing about it. >> > Huh. Okay, though I'm not sure when you became arbiter of this list. If > you don't

Hi everyone, Reid said: > Of the tools available, it seems that only subversion, arch, and > monotone are suitable for our purposes. But, we'd love to hear your > thoughts; especially if you have first-hand experience with these tools. Apart from using CVS as a client (as everyone does), I've only ever used Aegis (previous employer, for ~3 years) and Perforce (the employer

When I use option t and m together in the same dial statement the music on hold doesn't appear to work. Is this a normal operation? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040203/bfdd6806/attachment.htm

I think we had enough of Systemd flaming last month. Please stop polluting my inbox and find an operating system compatible with your worldview. It is really tiresome to keep on hearing about it. On 8 June 2017 at 14:51, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > Upstream 6 uses systemd? >>>> >>>>

Time ago when the svn server was crawling due to massive hammering from people mirroring the repo, someone said that after the 2.6 release we could discuss creating official mirrors for those who work with svn clients based on distributed VCSs such as git and bazaar. Such mirrors increase productivity (facilitating experimentation and parallel tasks, allowing off-line work) and even lessens the

On Oct 28, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Time ago when the svn server was crawling due to massive hammering > from > people mirroring the repo, someone said that after the 2.6 release we > could discuss creating official mirrors for those who work with svn > clients based on distributed VCSs such as git and bazaar. > > Such mirrors increase productivity

Hello! I am trying to use LLVM 2.4 in a project built with MS Visual Studio 2008. I've been building LLVM with the llvm/win32/llvm.sln solution successfully for x86 and x64. I haven't yet tried to move to the CMake build process, so I'd be interested to hear if the following issues have been resolved on that path. The problem that I've run into is that the LLVM codebase does

Dear Experts, After one of updates that was released some time ago (a Month ago or maybe even earlier) I have noticed the following. On the machines with default runlevel 5 (sorry about old terminology, the new one is still confusing for me ;-) GUI/X11 login (display manager) lists only users whose default shell is bash. Or, at least users whose default shell is tcsh are not listed at all, and if

I was wondering if there was an elegant way to extend a require array. To whit it would be wonderful to do somthing like this: class one { service { awesome: require => [ File[one], File[two] ] } file { one: ... two: ... } } class two inherits one { Service[awesome] { Require => + [ File[three], File[four] ] } file { three: ... four:

Hello list. No intention to start a flamewar here but I would really like opinions from those who know both the Cisco and Asterisk system. I'm working for a company with 15 offices in 11 countries, offices are relatively small (3-20 people each) and most of them have a Cisco 1760 Router installed with Call manager express (CME) and 1-3 ISDN lines (2-6 simultaneous calls). We

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Noted in the readme that rsync is licensed under GPL, and have some questions about this. Reading through a couple different places on the internet, of people wondering why there are few to no GUI front-ends (are there any good ones? if so, much of my questions here can be disregarded). I think I found one project, a PHP-GTK interface, that

On Fri, December 15, 2017 2:34 pm, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 15 December 2017 at 13:24, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> > wrote: >> Dear Experts, >> >> After one of updates that was released some time ago (a Month ago or >> maybe >> even earlier) I have noticed the following. On the machines with default >> runlevel 5 (sorry

Ok, folks, I have not followed this thread since the first few emails... but has anyone suggested the SCL repo? I see mysql 5.6 and 5.7 there. mark "this is not the flamewar I'm looking for. I'll move along...."

Dear All, I am given some noisy data which (by naked eye) appears to be oscillating first but finally growing. Is there any statistical set (I mean something different from e.g. a linear fit, which would not be convincing at all in my case) to detect growth (possibly without relying on any data fitting)? Many thanks Lorenzo

thanks to everyone offering sussgestions and pointers in answer to my questions about SME VoiP/* in the UK; i'll update you on my progress as and when this ends up as an implemented * solution (and i totally take on board the recommendation to look at 2nd hand CCME -- i should have said at the start that i've just co-ordinated an NBX install for a much larger project and that part of

Hi All, First post here. I am dialing out via call file to remote number, when call is connected a local number is dialed. And on success both calls get bridged and works fine. This is a parallel auto dialout application. I want to set a variable as soon as the local number answers the call, so that system won't try to dialout that local number again and stops further dialing. What should be

Folks, in many recent threads this pattern has been happening: OP: Any suggestions on how to do <something>? Responder 1: Look at <solution1>. Responder 2: Look at <solution2>. Responder 3: Look at <solution3>. Responder 4: It doesn't work for me / I don't like that / it's a stupid solution / etc

Well after I tried it the ./configure on all machines ( 4 total) I ran a few other compiles of other programs and figured out what was missing. Evidently the RH62 kernel "forgets" to put a symlink from /usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386 --> asm. I put that in and presto ./configure creates the Makefile and I am compiling 2.0.7Pre2 as we speak. What keyed this was trying a kernel compile,