search for: flamefests

God help me I know I said let it die, but it was continued elsewhere also. I'll try to keep this forest fire in ONE location. On 6/7/07, Frank Tanner III <pctech at mybellybutton.com> wrote: Okay, lets try to contain this to ONE forum (mailing list) please. > See... Your whole response to my whole firewall document thing is EXACTLY why I didn't post it on your wiki. Because

Dear developers, I don't care for reasons, arguments, or flamefests. I need to plan my workload. By now I have half a dozen servers overdue for reimaging. I can put this off for another week or two, but not really much longer. There's obviously no point in installing centos 5 on any new machine. So I need to know: is there any point in my waiting another wee...

Hi, On my public servers, I usually run BIND for DNS. I see CentOS offers a preconfigured (sort of) bind-chroot package. I wonder what's the effective benefit of this vs. a "normal" BIND setup without chroot. On my Slackware servers, I have a rather Keep-It-Simple approach to all things security, e. g. run no unneed services, open only needed ports etc. but I don't run the extra

Sorry these haven't been regularly scheduled :) --------- <p><p>Ogg Traffic for Wednesday, December 12, 2001 Jack Moffitt <[1]jack@xiph.org> _________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1. [2]Support The Ogg Project 2. [3]Status Updates 2.1. [4]Monty 2.2. [5]Stan Seibert 2.3. [6]Jack

Hi everybody, I''ve been trying to setup a Ruby on Rails application on a Ubuntu Feisty machine and I''ve spent a lot of time trying to figure out why Nginx and mongrel_cluster weren''t working. The setup was correct (based on some tutorials found on the internet), but there weren''t any pid files for the mongrels started. In case anybody else has experienced the

Le 11/03/2015 12:52, Joseph L. Brunner a ?crit : > Thanks for the info. > > Any reason you're leaving slackware now? Yes. As much as I appreciate Slackware's bone-headed philosophy, the installer, the simple startup scripts, the general Keep-It-Simple approach and the overall robustness, the absence of PAM has been a real showstopper for me. Until now the only way to setup

On 4/12/2017 3:11 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > On my public servers, I usually run BIND for DNS. I see CentOS offers a > preconfigured (sort of) bind-chroot package. I wonder what's the > effective benefit of this vs. a "normal" BIND setup without chroot. On > my Slackware servers, I have a rather Keep-It-Simple approach to all > things security, e. g. run no unneed

Thanks for the info. Any reason you're leaving slackware now? -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Niki Kovacs Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 05:23 AM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] SquidAnalyzer: minor trouble building RPM Le 11/03/2015 09:40, Niki Kovacs a ?crit : > Unfortunately when I insert

Hi, I'm trying to perform a installation of FF8 with wine, but the installation is very slow. About 2h to perform 10% of the install. Is there any reason about that ? I've a good configuration so it's not the fault of my pc. Second, no network connexion is available. Can I make it works ? Thx for your help. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

On 04/12/2017 06:18 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/12/2017 3:11 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> On my public servers, I usually run BIND for DNS. I see CentOS offers a >> preconfigured (sort of) bind-chroot package. I wonder what's the >> effective benefit of this vs. a "normal" BIND setup without chroot. On >> my Slackware servers, I have a rather

Hi, <p>I was streaming Ogg Vorbis to a mount point which didn't end .ogg ogg123 played the stream without any problems, but other clients (xmms, Audion) just kept rebuffering and failed to detect that it as an Ogg encoded stream. Surely the client should use the MIME type provided by the server rather than rely on the suffix in a URL ? <p>Is there any attempt to encourage

Al writes: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > If this is the case, then all of the other zero initializations can be > > removed as well. I figured that if most of the fields were being > > zeroed, then ones _not_ being zeroed would lead to this problem. > > Other zero initializations in inode->u certainly can be > removed, but whether it's

All, As much as I hate to ask, how is this project coming along? We are approaching the 4 month post-release point... -David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110404/1e9862bd/attachment-0005.html>

Hey all - I''ve got a question that I haven''t seen addressed anywhere and was wondering if anyone has put any thought into it or not... Here''s my setup... I have several *small* sites running apache/mongrel. Each has a single mongrel instance. Most don''t get any traffic (no one reads my blog :). And I was thinking, I could host a couple of more

Performace hits? Integration with existing applications? Security? Bugs? Memory use? -Ben Lisbakken -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.