search for: flabbergaster

Hi I have a large dataset, containing a wide range of binary variables. I would like first of all to compute a jaccard matrix, then do a PCA on this matrix, so that I finally can do a hierarchical clustering on the principal components. My problem is, that I don't know how to compute the jaccard dissimilarity matrix in R? Which package to use, and so on... Can anybody help me? Alternatively

Sorry, to bother the list one more time: but the following worked at least for 'urca': in NAMESPACE I now included explicitly: import(methods) a fix of the 'urca'-package will be uploaded to CRAN on the weekend. Fritz, will this work for ypur package 'flexclust' too? I have in my DESCRIPTION imports: methods and in flexclust it is in depends: methods. However, both

Very sporadicially (1 out of every 40-5000 boots), our blade system will hang indefinately while PXE Linux is attempting to locate it's configuration file. This is causing our automated testing to hang and generate failures. I have put more details below. My concerns are threefold: 1) System hangs 2) PXE Linux bootstrap never seems to retry the transaction 3) PXE Linux bootstrap never seems

Hi, Today I was flabbergasted to see something that looks like a rounding error in the very basic seq function in R. > a = seq(0.1,0.9,by=0.1) > a [1] 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 > a[1] == 0.1 [1] TRUE > a[2] == 0.2 [1] TRUE > a[3] == 0.3 [1] FALSE It turns out that the alternative > a = (1:9)/10 works just fine. Are there any good guides out there on how to deal

I'm getting a very strange error and I'm completely mystified by it. Thank you so much for taking a look! I recently migrated some users from another dovecot server to my own, and the previous admin had the passwords in their database using the SSHA256 scheme in HEX format. All the password hashes are in my database (MySQL) with a {SSHA256.HEX} prefix, and I thought at first that they

Dear Samba, I'm running Samba 3.3.8 and I have a Windows 7 client that was once able to join and log in domain users for a while thanks to http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7. Then after Christmas it's showing "the trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed" and refusing to log in domain users until I removed and rejoined the domain.

On 19/03/2020 03:56, JAVIER MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ wrote: > I fully agree with this: > >> Please consider holding off on removing features for the next major >> release, 2.4.0 instead. It makes sense to retain, in as much as is >> possible, feature backwards compatibility across a major release. I'm astonished that features are being removed in a dot release as well, no

Dear R-wizards! I have been learning on my own how to use this fantastic program.. but I agree with some people that even with the manuals, the faq and so on.. when you are sitting fully alone.. progress can be ... slow... very slow indeed.. In fact sometimes, looking at the "solutions" provided by some of you- I am just flabbergasted to the point that I couldn't figure out how to

Oh Nooooooo! It looks as if there is a limit of 9 (not 10) maximum #include statments that you can have in extensions.conf. For example, the following extensions.conf causes the error to appear.. [user_3250071] #include "inc/wildwildwest/features.conf" #include "inc/wildwildwest/features.conf" #include "inc/wildwildwest/features.conf" #include

puppet schrieb: > #779: access to inherited variables from within a template > -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- > Reporter: simu | Owner: luke > Type: enhancement | Status: new > Priority: normal | Milestone: >

18.03.20, 04:32 CET, Peter: > Please consider holding off on removing features for the next major > release, 2.4.0 instead. It makes sense to retain, in as much as is > possible, feature backwards compatibility across a major release. Seconded! That you are going to drop features from the code base that are old and rarely used is understandable. Doing so in a minor release is not.

On 18-03-2020 22:55, Noel Butler wrote: > On 19/03/2020 03:56, JAVIER MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ wrote: > >> I fully agree with this: >> >>> Please consider holding off on removing features for the next major >>> release, 2.4.0 instead. ?It makes sense to retain, in as much as is >>> possible, feature backwards compatibility across a major release. >>

This is (slightly) off-topic, but may be of interest: I've done some comparing of the overall performance obtained with gcc 3.2.0, compared to gcc 2.95.3 (linux/x86 platform). Has anybody done similar things, and/or does anybody have any comments on this? (Maybe be handled off-list AFAIAC.) 1) On simple benchmarks (dhrystone, "floating dhrystone", some of my own), 3.2 is faster

Hi, Just a quick question. I am looking for a replacement for the command "cp -al" which has problems dealing with a massive amount of files (http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2003-12/msg00028.html). Could I use "rsync -aHr" to do _exactly_ the same thing as "cp -al"? I just want to make sure before trying it. Thanks for your help. Charles --

Dear R-Experts, I seem to be dealing with a so called "headless" problem in R. I wrote a quite extensive program that generates a Bayesian network from a query protein's Phylogenetic Tree and subsequently uses a message passing algorithm to infer the most likely annotation for the query leaf in the tree using the other leaves known -and proven- protein function annotations. The

This is another edition of Rails Core Weekly, affectionately known as RCW. A much nicer pre-web 3.0 version is available from the following url : http://www.pinupgeek.com/articles/category/rails-core-weekly-news We have an Atom/RSS feed available there as well. Rails Core Weekly summarizes the rails-core mailing list, a list dedicated to Ruby on Rails internals and its development. RCW is

[I hope all of you had some good holidays/vacation!] My current flabbergaster: ## a dummy factor > size<- rep( c('short', 'long'), 10 ) ## take a subset: > subset( size, size!='short') [1] "long" "long" "long" "long" "long" "long" "long" "long" "long"...

I don't follow. Are you saying there's a limit of 10 contexts within extensions.conf? If, on the other hand, your saying that each context can only have 10 #include statements, I tried that too. See below. I put 12 #include's across two contexts, and still got the same error, I not sure that goto's are much of a solution, but I'll have to proof it. And that's my

Hi there I'm a complete newbie regarding Linux, but we've got a potential sale of our software to a large number of Linux computers and I'm trying to find out how feasible it is, and I'm hoping this is the place to find out! Our software is made using Adobe Director, and we distribute it either through a browser using Shockwave, or as a standalone executable (Projector). I'm

I have set up Samba so that all users on my small network can read from my one of my Linux shares as well as write to that share. However, when user A saves a file to that share, user B can't open it -- and vice versa. How can I set up samba so that all files written to that share can be read, modified, and deleted by all users? Thanks in advance for an answer to this question.