search for: flabbergasted

Hi I have a large dataset, containing a wide range of binary variables. I would like first of all to compute a jaccard matrix, then do a PCA on this matrix, so that I finally can do a hierarchical clustering on the principal components. My problem is, that I don't know how to compute the jaccard dissimilarity matrix in R? Which package to use, and so on... Can anybody help me? Alternatively

...; too? I have in my DESCRIPTION imports: methods and in flexclust it is in depends: methods. However, both packages have not import(methods) in their NAMESPACE. Anyway, I wonder why 'import(methods)' is explicitly needed in NAMESPACE? Would a smart and bright soul be so kind and enlighten a flabbergasted one? :-) Many thanks! Best, Bernhard >Dear R-Devel subscriber, > >as a follow up to my yesterday's email: I tested an analogous example >with the S4-package "flexclust" by executing the following code: > >library(flexclust) >example(cclust) >cl > >After...

Very sporadicially (1 out of every 40-5000 boots), our blade system will hang indefinately while PXE Linux is attempting to locate it's configuration file. This is causing our automated testing to hang and generate failures. I have put more details below. My concerns are threefold: 1) System hangs 2) PXE Linux bootstrap never seems to retry the transaction 3) PXE Linux bootstrap never seems

Hi, Today I was flabbergasted to see something that looks like a rounding error in the very basic seq function in R. > a = seq(0.1,0.9,by=0.1) > a [1] 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 > a[1] == 0.1 [1] TRUE > a[2] == 0.2 [1] TRUE > a[3] == 0.3 [1] FALSE It turns out that the alternative > a = (1:9)/10 w...

...atabase (MySQL) with a {SSHA256.HEX} prefix, and I thought at first that they were working fine, but then I checked my logs and am seeing this: localhost dovecot: auth: Error: password(***@***.***): Unknown scheme SSHA256.HEX.b64 (I have replaced the email address with asterisks) I am completely flabbergasted, as I can't imagine how "SSHA256.HEX.b64" is even coming in to existence as a string. I have triple checked the database and that combination appears nowhere in it. Does anybody have any idea how that is happening? Thanks again. -- View this message in context: http://dovecot.231...

...orkstation and the primary domain failed" and refusing to log in domain users until I removed and rejoined the domain. I'd say the workstation had been a member roughly one month. No other workstation by the same name was ever added to the domain, so that's not it. I'm a bit flabbergasted this happened. Is anybody experiencing this? --Koji

...astonished that features are being removed in a dot release as well, no other major project does this, hell, most don't like adding new features in dot releases let alone stripping them out. None of the listed changes affect me that I can see, but I've been around a long time and I'm flabbergasted that someone actually approved this on dot release. Now although there is no real need for them to further upgrade to ensure business continuity, if a serious exploit is released in the wild they highly likely will get bitten. Stripping everything else at once in a new major is perfectly acceptab...

...ng on my own how to use this fantastic program.. but I agree with some people that even with the manuals, the faq and so on.. when you are sitting fully alone.. progress can be ... slow... very slow indeed.. In fact sometimes, looking at the "solutions" provided by some of you- I am just flabbergasted to the point that I couldn't figure out how to come up with them myself (sometimes I don't even understand them :-( ) But after spending around three weeks on this, and starting to get fairly obsessed with it, I decided I shall ask for help,'cause i can't figure out in the documen...

...ide fine tuned granularity to allow user and company level features with the use of #include and include=>? Does anyone know what I can look for in the source to increase this limit to a reasonable number, say... several THOUSAND? What bad things could happen if I increased this limit? I'm flabbergasted. Please, someone tell me I have got this all wrong. Doug. -----Original Message----- From: Douglas Garstang Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 4:46 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Extensions.conf error - 'Maximum Include level(10) exceede...

...n example of how I have to build our services, the reason for my wanting that feature might becom clearer to you. I really put a lot of thought in that whole thing by now and this is the best solution i came up with. And I still cant believe that I am the only one wanting such a thing - I am quite flabbergasted by that.. _______________________________________________ Puppet-users mailing list Puppet-users@madstop.com https://mail.madstop.com/mailman/listinfo/puppet-users

18.03.20, 04:32 CET, Peter: > Please consider holding off on removing features for the next major > release, 2.4.0 instead. It makes sense to retain, in as much as is > possible, feature backwards compatibility across a major release. Seconded! That you are going to drop features from the code base that are old and rarely used is understandable. Doing so in a minor release is not.

...re being removed in a dot release as well, > no other major project does this, hell, most don't like adding new > features in dot releases let alone stripping them out. > > None of the listed changes affect me that I can see, but I've been > around a long time and I'm flabbergasted that someone actually approved > this on dot release. > > Now although there is no real need for them to further upgrade to ensure > business continuity, if a serious exploit is released in the wild they > highly likely will get bitten. Stripping everything else at once in a &gt...

...v1] with 2.95.3 takes as much time as evaluating just v1,v2 (sic!!), whereas with 3.2 it takes more than 50% more time than sum[v1,v2] (and evaluating v1,v2 is faster). In both cases, the procedure code *is* evaluated, and my "compiler" doesn't do loop optimising :) I think that "flabbergasted" is a correct description of my state of mind in this... R.B. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in t...

Hi, Just a quick question. I am looking for a replacement for the command "cp -al" which has problems dealing with a massive amount of files (http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2003-12/msg00028.html). Could I use "rsync -aHr" to do _exactly_ the same thing as "cp -al"? I just want to make sure before trying it. Thanks for your help. Charles --

...does not terminate ever. Memory usage sky-rockets and the process spends almost all of its time on system calls. Using the identical R code inside an interactive R shell with the very same input data "inp" the script does not have any problems and finishes actually amazingly fast. I am flabbergasted and do require help. Hence my questions: * Is anything known about a problem similar to mine appearing when using the above libraries? * What is the difference -aside from the obvious missing interactiveness- between running the very same R code inside an interactive R shell or inside a file as a...

...patch that allows Rails to load a plugin from gem (!), permit the plugin script to install them (!), give the plugin generator''s default Rakefile the ability to package and publish a gem (!) and finally introduce freezing/unfreezing for plugins (!). He explains why. The Core is apparently flabbergasted by the practicality of his suggested patch. No replies have come yet. That''s it for this week, hope to see you at Railsconf late this week and otherwise ''till next Sunday ! -- Rodney http://www.pinupgeek.com http://www.dutchrailers.org

[I hope all of you had some good holidays/vacation!] My current flabbergaster: ## a dummy factor > size<- rep( c('short', 'long'), 10 ) ## take a subset: > subset( size, size!='short') [1] "long" "long" "long" "long" "long" "long" "long" "long" "long" "long" ##

...larity to allow user and company level features with the use of #include and include=>? > >Does anyone know what I can look for in the source to increase this limit to a reasonable number, say... several THOUSAND? What bad things could happen if I increased this limit? > >I'm flabbergasted. Please, someone tell me I have got this all wrong. > >Doug. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Douglas Garstang >Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 4:46 PM >To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion >Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Extensions.conf er...

Hi there I'm a complete newbie regarding Linux, but we've got a potential sale of our software to a large number of Linux computers and I'm trying to find out how feasible it is, and I'm hoping this is the place to find out! Our software is made using Adobe Director, and we distribute it either through a browser using Shockwave, or as a standalone executable (Projector). I'm

I have set up Samba so that all users on my small network can read from my one of my Linux shares as well as write to that share. However, when user A saves a file to that share, user B can't open it -- and vice versa. How can I set up samba so that all files written to that share can be read, modified, and deleted by all users? Thanks in advance for an answer to this question.