search for: fizzl

...docs/Samba24Hc13.pdf] but I can't figure out how to fix the problem. I suspect that the broadcast address may not be the same on both boxes, but how do I set that in Windows XP? The problem may be something else, so I'll try to be as specific as possible: The server ip is 10.0.1.201, named fizzlebox The windows ip is 10.0.1.2, named studio My smb.conf: ************************************************************************ * [global] log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 preserve case = no domain master = yes hosts...

So we had that nice long thread about the commercial support page a week ago. There were a few recommendations on changes to the page. What next? It is not clear to me if any recommendations were accepted or are being debated internally or if this fizzled out somehow. Is there any process to this kind of thing other than a few developers agreeing it a good thing and then just doing it? I'm not complaining, but I am genuinely curious. --------------------------------- Geoff Galitz Blankenheim NRW, Germany http://www.galitz.org/ http://...

Hello All, This conversations seems to have fizzled out and I would like to try to revive it. My intention is to pick up where Graham left off with enabling partial-inlining by default. On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Florian Hahn via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 13/11/2017 14:47, Evgeny Astigeevich v...

...RbigData), which were in part built for this purpose. Later also the package hola (on GitHub/RbigData) was built to connect with adios2, which can do buffered in situ connections with various codes. But the VisIt developers were not interested in R (preferring to roll their own), so that direction fizzled. Paraview is a competetive sibling of VisIt, so I don?t know if they would be interested. The packages we developed are viable for that purpose. There is a lot in R that could benefit Paraview (or VisIt). George > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 14:20:17 +0000 > From: Mike Mar...

On 08/23/2017 12:44 PM, David Chisnall wrote: > On 23 Aug 2017, at 18:21, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On 08/23/2017 12:06 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev wrote: >>> On 8/23/2017 11:58 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote: >>>> If we want to go down that route, I can certainly imagine a feasible

During that variable renaming debate, there was a discussion about discussion about doing things all at once, piecemeal or not at all. An issue that wasn't really resolved I think. I had the impression that the efforts fizzled out a bit, and I thought this renaming was maybe related to that, but I'm neutral on if we should do variable renaming. All I'm asking as a kindness if we could be kind on poor downstream maintainers not on the issue of variable renaming at large, but on the micro level of not pushing 5/...

...r such creatures and only bring as much data into the R space as was actually needed. So I see 3 possibilities: 1. The sort of functionality you describe is implemented in the R internals (by people other than me). 2. Some individuals (perhaps myself included) write such a package. 3. This thread fizzles out and we do nothing. I guess I will see what, if any, discussion ensues from this point to see which of these three options seems worth pursuing. > -- > Fran??ois Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at stat.math....

...<junbuml at codeaurora.org>, "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, Tobias Grosser <tobias.grosser at inf.ethz.ch>, nd <nd at arm.com> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Enable Partial Inliner by default Hello All, This conversations seems to have fizzled out and I would like to try to revive it. My intention is to pick up where Graham left off with enabling partial-inlining by default. On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Florian Hahn via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Hi, On 13/11/2017 14...

I'm not sure a decision was already made as such. I think it's more that there was a flurry of conversation last time with lots of conflicting opinions, and then the conversation just fizzled out. FWIW, I like Phabricator but I'm willing to try GitHub. Overall I think we should take the same approach that eventually led to Phabricator being widely adopted: We should allow GitHub PR's and see if the community generally settles on one or the other. > On Jan 7, 2020, at 19:1...

Hi, > Cool, I hope this succeeds. I tried implementing per-test timeouts before, and couldn't get it to work in all cases. The review eventually fizzled out, and I abandoned it. > > Here's that old review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6584 Perhaps you can cannibalize testcases from it. Thanks for that. I'll take a look. > >> >> I'm e-mailing llvm-dev rather than llvm-commits >> because I want to gather more fee...

...On 2/18/20 1:37 AM, Ties Stuij via llvm-dev wrote: > > During that variable renaming debate, there was a discussion about > discussion about doing things all at once, piecemeal or not at all. An > issue that wasn't really resolved I think. I had the impression that the > efforts fizzled out a bit, and I thought this renaming was maybe related to > that, but I'm neutral on if we should do variable renaming. > > > > All I'm asking as a kindness if we could be kind on poor downstream > maintainers not on the issue of variable renaming at large, but on the...

...o keep smaller verbosity numbers > reasonably quiet, and sufficient info to see the logic progression at a > given debug level (e.g. if major milestones of a routine are logged at > level N, further traces like "I saw value X here" would be N+1 or more). > De-facto verbosities fizzle out at 6, but generally it is an int value, > so... Sounds good - what I wrote down as a plan for bestfortress very much matches that, 1 to 5 where 5 is if you want to see every IO byte. > Regarding syslog/stdout/stderr, the upsdebugx*() methods are defined here > and near: > https...

...is mostly ad-hoc, to keep smaller verbosity numbers reasonably quiet, and sufficient info to see the logic progression at a given debug level (e.g. if major milestones of a routine are logged at level N, further traces like "I saw value X here" would be N+1 or more). De-facto verbosities fizzle out at 6, but generally it is an int value, so... Regarding syslog/stdout/stderr, the upsdebugx*() methods are defined here and near: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/ad70749f243527e774c3f03a08228430143396e9/common/common.c#L1205 and end up calling vupslog() at which can report to st...

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one >> of >> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user >> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and involvement. >> So, you're saying that end users

...AM, Ties Stuij via llvm-dev wrote: >> > During that variable renaming debate, there was a discussion about >> discussion about doing things all at once, piecemeal or not at all. An >> issue that wasn't really resolved I think. I had the impression that the >> efforts fizzled out a bit, and I thought this renaming was maybe related to >> that, but I'm neutral on if we should do variable renaming. >> > >> > All I'm asking as a kindness if we could be kind on poor downstream >> maintainers not on the issue of variable renaming at la...

Hello, list. My server box recently popped, fizzled, and smoked. As such, I'm salvaging bits from it. One of these is a PCI-E GeForce 6600 GT card. Anyone want it? I'm in Sydney, Australia, and am unlikely to be in Europe anytime soon. It shouldn't cost too much to ship there, though.

...me? I can''t seem to find much info about it through web searches. I asked the question on this list a few months back and the following thread was brought to my attention: http://xen.markmail.org/search/?q=device+lock#query:devicelock+page:1+mid:ouugxur56hqikqty+state:results The thread fizzled out pretty early but there was a suggestion that vdb locks belong in higher level management tools, rather than xend... Would that include tools like xm? Are there other tools that can take care of management of vms across multiple nodes and protect against disk corruption caused by starting the...

I just installed Fedora in VMWare. Can somebopdy tell me what lines i have to put in yum.conf so R will be automatically integrated in the package system and updated when a new release is available? -- Erich Neuwirth, Computer Supported Didactics Working Group Visit our SunSITE at http://sunsite.univie.ac.at Phone: +43-1-4277-38624 Fax: +43-1-4277-9386

Hello, Does OpenSSH have any plans yet to extend the existing X11 forwarding support to include Xprint - the XOrg standard for printing? Documentation can be found at http://xprint.mozdev.org/docs/ The only change required to have Xprint support is to forward the X print server connection referenced by the XPSERVERLIST environment variable similar to the video display server referenced by the

Hi, On 13/11/2017 14:47, Evgeny Astigeevich via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi Graham, > > I created a bug report with a reproducer for the failures I’ve got: > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35288 > That bug should be fixed by https://reviews.llvm.org/rL320199 Cheers, Florian