Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "find_librari".
Did you mean:
find_library
2012 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] cindex.py using find_library
Hello all,
Is there a reason why the library location code in cindex py does not use
find_library() to locate libclang, like in the attached patch?
Without it there were problems locating a versioned libclang.so.1 file on
Debian, for example.
Cheers,
Mihai
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2012 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] cindex.py using find_library
On 06/25/2012 12:50 AM, Mihai Basa wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Is there a reason why the library location code in cindex py does not
> use find_library() to locate libclang, like in the attached patch?
>
> Without it there were problems locating a versioned libclang.so.1 file
> on Debian, for example.
Hi Mihai,
as this is a clang related question, I move your mail to the clang
2006 May 22
2
good practice or waste of time?
I have what I hope is a simple question regarding a security practice
I''ve been using in my first Rails app. I want to know if it''s
worthwhile or if the extra typing isn''t worth it.
I have 3 models that are related to each other.
class User < AR:Base
has_one :library
end
class Library < AR:Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :items
end
class Item < AR:Base
2015 Jun 23
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.7 release plans
> > - Using CMake for the release binaries. I think I promised we'd do
> > this for 3.7. I haven't actually started looking at this yet, but I'm
> > still optimistic.
>
> I'm absolutely in agreement with this. Most of us already use CMake
> for development, a lot of the buildbots are based on it and I think we
> all agree that autoconf is deprecated.
2020 Oct 08
2
Re: Building libvirt library without libvirtd or virsh
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 09:38:22AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 04:50:26PM -0700, Román González wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> > I'm trying to play with musl and libvirt to see if I'm able to build a
> > libvirt client binary without dynamic lib dependencies. I have two
> > questions:
> >
> > 1) to your knowledge,
2015 Jul 29
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] July Update: Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
Hi LLVMDev,
The following issues have been fixed since the last update I sent out.
Completed:
* Bug 19462 - Use the INSTALL(EXPORT ...) to export CMake definitions
* Bug 21561 - Update release scripts to use CMake
These issues are still outstanding. Classification of blocking vs non-blocking are my own opinions, please let me know if you disagree. All non-blocking issues are still serious bugs
2020 Oct 08
0
Re: Building libvirt library without libvirtd or virsh
>
> If you want to do a minimal build of libvirt you can run meson with
> --auto-features=disabled which will disable most of the features and you
> can explicitly enable only the things that you want to use (this is what
> most distributions are doing when building packages). I just noticed
> that there are some build options where this doesn't work so I'll post
>
2015 Oct 27
6
[RFC] Late October Update: Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
Hi LLVMDev,
There’s been a good bit of progress this month, and with the dev meeting later this week I thought I’d send out a second update. There are only two outstanding blocking issues that don’t have patches proposed, PR 21568 & PR 23947. I would greatly appreciate if someone who works on Mips would take a look at PR 23947.
The following issues have been marked as fixed since the last
2010 Jun 15
11
mysql gem install not happening on Mac OS Leopard - any inputs at all??
Hello all,
Ive got Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.8), ruby 1.8.6 (2009-06-08 patchlevel
369) [universal-darwin9.0] and mysql 5.0.67 installed and working fine
with Rails 2.1.0.
"which ruby" outputs /usr/bin/ruby. I can see the mysql symlink in /
usr/local/mysql. I can also see the mysql-5.0.67-osx10.5-x86 folder
in /usr/local .
Im trying to upgrade my Rails apps to 2.3.5 but when i try to
2015 Jul 29
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] July Update: Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
Hi Chris,
Looking forward to continued support for CMake!
Along that note, I wanted to add one bug to your list of things to track,
which to me seems up your alley but maybe was filed in the wrong bucket (or
is actually someone else's problem).
Bug 24154 - CMake shared files are broken in llvm-3.7-dev
Cheers,
Brenden
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:20 PM Chris Bieneman <beanz at
2015 Jul 30
1
[LLVMdev] [RFC] July Update: Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
Hi Brenden,
Thanks for the heads up. I don’t expect that to be a blocker for deprecating autoconf because autoconf doesn’t have an equivalent of LLVMExports.cmake. That said it is a real issue and I’ll track it with the other issues on this list, and I’ve added it as a dependency on the meta bug (PR15732) to make it easier to keep track of.
Thanks,
-Chris
> On Jul 29, 2015, at 4:48 PM,
2017 May 29
0
[PATCH] Add CMake build script
Description
===========
This patch adds support of CMake meta build system, so you can generate
Unix makefiles, VS 6.0-2017 projects and many more.
Features
========
* Win32 and Linux tested
* Travis CI test added
* Generates working Visual Studio 6.0-2017 solutions
* Generates working Unix Makefile
* Supported options (<option> - <default value>):
* `ENABLE_FLOATING_POINT` - on
2015 Jun 23
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.7 release plan and call for testers
Daniel,
Note the openmp library only has cmake build machinery
preventing autoconf-based builds.
Jack
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Daniel Sanders
<Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll do Mips as usual. Are we going to do an autoconf-based build for LLVM 3.7? If so, I might try Mips64 packages too.
>
>> -----Original
2016 Feb 09
2
D16945: LLVM overhaul to avoid linking LLVM component libraries with libLLVM
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> Chris Bieneman is probably your best bet, and maybe also Dan Liew.
>
Hans,
My current, and hopefully final, revision of the proposed patch
is simplified and reworked to solve the problem entirely from cmake
without touching the the llvm-build python scripts. Basically, the new
fix for avoiding the
2020 Sep 03
0
Re: libvirt 6.7 meson.build error
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:56:58PM +0000, Chen Wenwei wrote:
> Found pkg-config: /usr/local/bin/pkg-config (0.29.2)
> Did not find CMake 'cmake'
> Found CMake: NO
> Run-time dependency libapparmor found: NO (tried pkgconfig and cmake)
> Library attr found: YES
> Library audit found: YES
> Run-time dependency bash-completion found: YES 2.1
> Run-time dependency blkid
2018 Mar 23
0
check_include_file not respecting CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH
$ file /home/andy/misc/bootstrap/out/native/include/zlib.h
/home/andy/misc/bootstrap/out/native/include/zlib.h: C source, ASCII text
$ cmake /home/andy/misc/bootstrap/llvm-6.0.0.src
-DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=/home/andy/misc/bootstrap/out/native
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/andy/misc/bootstrap/out/native
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
-DLLVM_EXPERIMENTAL_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=WebAssembly; \
-- Looking for
2020 Oct 07
2
Building libvirt library without libvirtd or virsh
Hello there,
I'm trying to play with musl and libvirt to see if I'm able to build a
libvirt client binary without dynamic lib dependencies. I have two
questions:
1) to your knowledge, is this exercise futile?
2) Do you know if there is a way to *only* compile the library bits?
I want to reduce the number of dependencies in the build, and only
construct the libvirt libraries, not
2015 May 26
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.7 release plans
Hello everyone,
There is still some time to go, but I would like to share my
preliminary plan for 3.7.
The idea is to keep us on the 6-month release cycle, which means:
- Branch for 3.7 on 14 July 2015
- Release 3.7 end of August (absolutely no later than 4 September)
I also have a few things I'd like to try this time:
- Announce the first release candidate on llvm-announce to encourage
2016 Feb 06
2
D16945: LLVM overhaul to avoid linking LLVM component libraries with libLLVM
Hans,
I have posted a complete patch for solving the linkage issues
with LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB on Phabricator at
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16945. The bulk of the fix the simple
changes of...
Index: cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake
===================================================================
--- cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake (revision 259743)
+++ cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake (working copy)
@@