search for: finalized

Hello, I need some help on a regression I am running please. I am running a multiple regression in R and I am getting weird outputs and would like your help in resolving it. This is the code I run: Reg = lm (Final$Y.t.-Final$Y.t.1. ~ Final$ Y.t.1. + Final$Cor + Final$Gov+ Final$Inv+ Final$TrOp + Final$Pop+ Final$Sch , data = Final) summary(Reg) And the output I get is pasted below. As

Hi Rabby, Before you run your regression, try this: is.factor(Final$Cor) If this returns TRUE, then this variable is a factor and it will be treated as a number of levels rather than a set of numeric values. This usually happens when a text file is read in and there is at least one value that cannot be converted to numeric. So if you are doing something like this:

I had llvm 2.9 installed on ununtu. I tried to build clang but got following error. I have llvm 2.9 and clang is latest version ( I don't know, I got from svn). I am wondering is it because of version problem ? Does clang work with 2.9 llvm ? llvm[3]: Compiling ClangASTNodesEmitter.cpp for Debug build In file included from

Hi all, I have run a ridge regression as follows: reg=lm.ridge(final$l~final$lag1+final$lag2+final$g+final$g+final$u, lambda=seq(0,10,0.01)) Then I enter : select(reg) and it returns: modified HKB estimator is 19.3409 modified L-W estimator is 36.18617 smallest value of GCV at 10 I think it means that it is

Hi, final<-data.frame() ?? for (m1 in 4:10) { ?????? for (n1 in 4:10){? ?????????? for (x1 in 0: m1) { ????????????? for (y1 in 0: n1) { final<- rbind(final,c(m1,n1,x1,y1)) res}}}} ?final1<-within(final,{flag<-ifelse(x1/m1>y1/n1, 1,0)}) ?head(final1) #? m1 n1 x1 y1 flag #1? 4? 4? 0? 0??? 0 #2? 4? 4? 0? 1??? 0 #3? 4? 4? 0? 2??? 0 #4? 4? 4? 0? 3??? 0 #5? 4? 4? 0? 4??? 0 #6? 4? 4?

...ving the SEXP external pointer object is difficult because it was handed over to the closing function directly as a parameter) Best regards Jens Oehlschl?gel // C-code static void rindex_finalize(SEXP extPtr){ pINT ptr = R_ExternalPtrAddr(extPtr); if(ptr){ Free(ptr); Rprintf("finalized\n"); }else{ Rprintf("nothing to finalize\n"); } return; } SEXP rindex_open( SEXP Sn ){ int i,n = INTEGER(Sn)[0]; pINT ptr = Calloc(sizeof(INT)*n, INT); SEXP extPtr, ret; for (i=0;i<n;i++){ ptr[i] = i; } extPtr = R_MakeExternalPtr(ptr, install("Ri...

Hi, I've got some questions regarding finalizers registered using reg.finalizer(). I have a setup where in certain cases I wish to set a new finalizer to an object that already got one. Since there is no API for removing/replacing already registered finalizers (have been "requested" previously on this list), I have basically just added a new finalizer by calling reg.finalizer() a

Hi, I'm running Finale 2009 on Wine 1.2.2 on Kubuntu 10.10. Everything works great, including MIDI and VST playback, but I just noticed a bug in the Manage Parts dialogue. When I click the "Add to Part" button, Wine crashes with an error dialogue, and then freezes when I click to close the error dialogue. The "Remove from Part" button works fine, I have replicated this

Hello, Using this data: http://n4.nabble.com/file/n1676330/US_Final_Values.txt US_Final_Values.txt and the following code i got the image at the end of this message: US.final.values<-read.table("c:/tmp/US_Final_Values.txt",header=T,sep=" ") US.nls.1<-nls(US.final.values$ECe~a*US.final.values$WTD^b+c,data=US.final.values,start=list(a=2.75,b=-0.95,c=0.731),trace=TRUE)

...;) library(test) pool <- make_pool() show_handles(pool) rm(pool) gc() What this example is supposed to illustrate is that even though 'prot' gets protected from GC while the externalptr is around, the finalizers in 'prot' have already executed when the externalptr gets finalized. What is even stranger (to me) is that the SEXPs in 'prot' still seem in tact during the finalizer of externalptr (ASAN is not giving use-after-free warnings either). It's just that their finalizers have already executed. So that leaves the pool finalizer in the odd position of seeing...

Hi all, I have run a ridge regression as follows: reg=lm.ridge(final$l~final$lag1+final$lag2+final$g+final$u, lambda=seq(0,10,0.01)) Then I enter : select(reg) and it returns: modified HKB estimator is 19.3409 modified L-W estimator is 36.18617 smallest value of GCV at 10 I think it means that it is advisable to

With this set-up options(warn = 1) tf <- tempfile() finalizer <- function(obj) { message("finalizer") close(obj$f) } this code works ev <- new.env() ev$f <- file(tf, "w") reg.finalizer(ev, finalizer) rm(ev) gc() whereas this (reversing the order of file() and reg.finalizer()) ev <- new.env() reg.finalizer(ev, finalizer) ev$f <- file(tf,

Hello everyone. I need some help to understand when number precision in R is set. For this please consider the following example for (i in c(2:length(final))){ sizex <- c(sizex,(final[i]-final[i-1],digits=2))) # round is used to remove values that are too small like e-17. print(round(final[i]-final[i-1],digits=2)) } final[2]-final[1] return something like 4.440892e-16, which

On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 2:13 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 08/06/2019 7:42 a.m., Gergely Dar?czi wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I'm using "reg.finalizer" in a function that is to be called in R scripts > > to do some cleanup on success. I have not found a way to run the function > > only if the script run without

Hello, I am new and am having a hard time getting the proper syntax for output from loops. I am working on a simulation to generate a null expectation of bee behavior. Pieces of it work. The part that I am having specific difficulty is in output of a vector from within the while loop that I am using. Basically the simulation works as such: I have a starting point and a neighbor matrix and a

doc/swfdec-sections.txt | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++- libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.h | 9 ++- libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 79 ++++++++++++++-------------- test/trace/Makefile.am | 7 ++ test/trace/try-throw-in-finally-6.swf |binary

Hi, I have tagged 3.6.2-final, so testers can start building and uploading -final binaries. There was only one change between 3.6.2-rc1 and 3.6.2-final, which was a patch to the R600 backend to fix the build with VS2012. Running a full regression suite is probably not necessary, but you still can if you want to be extra careful. -Tom

>From the help/docs it is pretty clear that one could/should only assume that the 'base' namespace is available when a finalizer function is evaluated. What is not clear to me is whether you can safely attach/load packages in your finalizer function. For example, are the following finalizer functions safe? reg.finalizer(e, function(e, ...) { library("tcltk")

Hi, I've tagged the 8.0.1-rc1 release. Testers, please begin testing and upload the binaries. If you still want to have a bug fix included in the 8.0.1 final release you have until June 6 to request a fix be backported to the releases/8.0 branch. To make a request, file a bug at bugs.llvm.org and put release-8.0.1 into the 'Blocks:' field. You can also use the

I have been trying to create code to calculate the power for an adaptive design with a survival endpoint according to the method of Schafer and Muller ('Modification of the sample size and the schedule of interim analyses in survival trials based on interim inspections,' Stats in Med, 2001). This design allows for the sample size to be increased (if necessary) based on an interim look at