Hi, I have tagged 3.6.2-final, so testers can start building and uploading -final binaries. There was only one change between 3.6.2-rc1 and 3.6.2-final, which was a patch to the R600 backend to fix the build with VS2012. Running a full regression suite is probably not necessary, but you still can if you want to be extra careful. -Tom
On 06 Jul 2015, at 23:35, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> > I have tagged 3.6.2-final, so testers can start building and uploading > -final binaries. There was only one change between 3.6.2-rc1 and > 3.6.2-final, which was a patch to the R600 backend to fix the build > with VS2012. Running a full regression suite is probably not necessary, > but you still can if you want to be extra careful.No problems building and testing on FreeBSD. Binaries uploaded: SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.2-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = 8f6226cfe61fea2ceb6f61b6b6be362acb912c99ef75d8d361788a24ebefa31f SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.2-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = be189a269aa1492d601daae269ceaad3ab1ee46797a5c09a05e66793ed0887e2 -Dimitry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150707/8e32f15d/attachment.sig>
ARM+AArch64 up. All gree. On 6 July 2015 at 22:35, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> Hi, > > I have tagged 3.6.2-final, so testers can start building and uploading > -final binaries. There was only one change between 3.6.2-rc1 and > 3.6.2-final, which was a patch to the R600 backend to fix the build > with VS2012. Running a full regression suite is probably not necessary, > but you still can if you want to be extra careful. > > -Tom
On 7 July 2015 at 06:17, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> ARM+AArch64 up. All gree.Just to note there was a bug in test-release.sh where the script would not exit if the build/tests failed making failures less noticeable. I've fixed it in r241599. It would be a good idea to use that fix unless you are happy combing through the logs for failures.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> I have tagged 3.6.2-final, so testers can start building and uploading > -final binaries. There was only one change between 3.6.2-rc1 and > 3.6.2-final, which was a patch to the R600 backend to fix the build > with VS2012. Running a full regression suite is probably not necessary, > but you still can if you want to be extra careful.Uploaded the Windows installer: (sha1) 8dec566d07dca64e6e62082b35c6387a838c6fda LLVM-3.6.2-win32.exe Attaching the batch file I used in case anyone wishes to reproduce it. - Hans -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: build_llvm_362._bat_ Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2384 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150708/22b53fa1/attachment.obj>
2015-07-06 23:35 GMT+02:00 Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>:> Hi, > > I have tagged 3.6.2-final, so testers can start building and uploading > -final binaries. There was only one change between 3.6.2-rc1 and > 3.6.2-final, which was a patch to the R600 backend to fix the build > with VS2012. Running a full regression suite is probably not necessary, > but you still can if you want to be extra careful. > > -Tom >Uploaded 510d2d0efab90a7fecb361ddc730a51219664c53 clang+llvm-3.6.2-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz Tests on green. Cheers, Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150708/a52158bf/attachment.html>
clang+llvm-3.6.2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz clang+llvm-3.6.2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz uploaded and ok.> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Stellard [mailto:tom at stellard.net] > Sent: 06 July 2015 22:36 > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Cc: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: 3.6.2-final has been tagged. > > Hi, > > I have tagged 3.6.2-final, so testers can start building and uploading > -final binaries. There was only one change between 3.6.2-rc1 and > 3.6.2-final, which was a patch to the R600 backend to fix the build > with VS2012. Running a full regression suite is probably not necessary, > but you still can if you want to be extra careful. > > -Tom
Hi Tom, Are we waiting for more binaries? cheers, --renato On 6 July 2015 at 22:35, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> Hi, > > I have tagged 3.6.2-final, so testers can start building and uploading > -final binaries. There was only one change between 3.6.2-rc1 and > 3.6.2-final, which was a patch to the R600 backend to fix the build > with VS2012. Running a full regression suite is probably not necessary, > but you still can if you want to be extra careful. > > -Tom
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:27:03PM +0100, Renato Golin wrote:> Hi Tom, > > Are we waiting for more binaries? >No, every thing is ready. I just need to update the website and send the release announcement. -Tom> cheers, > --renato > > On 6 July 2015 at 22:35, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have tagged 3.6.2-final, so testers can start building and uploading > > -final binaries. There was only one change between 3.6.2-rc1 and > > 3.6.2-final, which was a patch to the R600 backend to fix the build > > with VS2012. Running a full regression suite is probably not necessary, > > but you still can if you want to be extra careful. > > > > -Tom