search for: finales

Hello, I need some help on a regression I am running please. I am running a multiple regression in R and I am getting weird outputs and would like your help in resolving it. This is the code I run: Reg = lm (Final$Y.t.-Final$Y.t.1. ~ Final$ Y.t.1. + Final$Cor + Final$Gov+ Final$Inv+ Final$TrOp + Final$Pop+ Final$Sch , data = Final) summary(Reg) And the output I get is pasted below. As

Hi Rabby, Before you run your regression, try this: is.factor(Final$Cor) If this returns TRUE, then this variable is a factor and it will be treated as a number of levels rather than a set of numeric values. This usually happens when a text file is read in and there is at least one value that cannot be converted to numeric. So if you are doing something like this:

I had llvm 2.9 installed on ununtu. I tried to build clang but got following error. I have llvm 2.9 and clang is latest version ( I don't know, I got from svn). I am wondering is it because of version problem ? Does clang work with 2.9 llvm ? llvm[3]: Compiling ClangASTNodesEmitter.cpp for Debug build In file included from

Hi all, I have run a ridge regression as follows: reg=lm.ridge(final$l~final$lag1+final$lag2+final$g+final$g+final$u, lambda=seq(0,10,0.01)) Then I enter : select(reg) and it returns: modified HKB estimator is 19.3409 modified L-W estimator is 36.18617 smallest value of GCV at 10 I think it means that it is

Hi, final<-data.frame() ?? for (m1 in 4:10) { ?????? for (n1 in 4:10){? ?????????? for (x1 in 0: m1) { ????????????? for (y1 in 0: n1) { final<- rbind(final,c(m1,n1,x1,y1)) res}}}} ?final1<-within(final,{flag<-ifelse(x1/m1>y1/n1, 1,0)}) ?head(final1) #? m1 n1 x1 y1 flag #1? 4? 4? 0? 0??? 0 #2? 4? 4? 0? 1??? 0 #3? 4? 4? 0? 2??? 0 #4? 4? 4? 0? 3??? 0 #5? 4? 4? 0? 4??? 0 #6? 4? 4?

Dear R .Call() insiders, Can someone enlighten me how to properly finalize external pointers in C code (R-2.5.1 win)? What is the relation between R_ClearExternalPtr and the finalizer set in R_RegisterCFinalizer? I succeeded registering a finalizer that works when an R object containing an external pointer is garbage collected. However, I have some difficulties figuring out how to do that in an

Hi, I've got some questions regarding finalizers registered using reg.finalizer(). I have a setup where in certain cases I wish to set a new finalizer to an object that already got one. Since there is no API for removing/replacing already registered finalizers (have been "requested" previously on this list), I have basically just added a new finalizer by calling reg.finalizer() a

...a490000- a521000 Deferred midmeasurerepeats.fxt PE a640000- a6c5000 Deferred createcodasystem.fxt PE a7e0000- a7f4000 Deferred numrpt32.fxt PE a910000- a91a000 Deferred autobr32.fxt PE ab30000- accf000 Deferred finalescript.fxt PE acd0000- ace3000 Deferred cntitm32.fxt PE ae00000- ae18000 Deferred commandline.fxt PE af30000- af50000 Deferred chngfnt.fxt PE b060000- b08b000 Deferred lextract.fxt PE b090000- b10c000 Deferred...

Hello, Using this data: http://n4.nabble.com/file/n1676330/US_Final_Values.txt US_Final_Values.txt and the following code i got the image at the end of this message: US.final.values<-read.table("c:/tmp/US_Final_Values.txt",header=T,sep=" ") US.nls.1<-nls(US.final.values$ECe~a*US.final.values$WTD^b+c,data=US.final.values,start=list(a=2.75,b=-0.95,c=0.731),trace=TRUE)

Given an externalptr object 'pool' which protects an R object 'prot': # SEXP prot = (a dynamically updated list with handles) SEXP pool = R_MakeExternalPtr(p, R_NilValue, prot); R_RegisterCFinalizerEx(pool, fin_pool, TRUE); WRE explains that 'prot' remains in existence as long as 'pool' is around. Does this also mean 'prot' still exists when the

Hi all, I have run a ridge regression as follows: reg=lm.ridge(final$l~final$lag1+final$lag2+final$g+final$u, lambda=seq(0,10,0.01)) Then I enter : select(reg) and it returns: modified HKB estimator is 19.3409 modified L-W estimator is 36.18617 smallest value of GCV at 10 I think it means that it is advisable to

With this set-up options(warn = 1) tf <- tempfile() finalizer <- function(obj) { message("finalizer") close(obj$f) } this code works ev <- new.env() ev$f <- file(tf, "w") reg.finalizer(ev, finalizer) rm(ev) gc() whereas this (reversing the order of file() and reg.finalizer()) ev <- new.env() reg.finalizer(ev, finalizer) ev$f <- file(tf,

Hello everyone. I need some help to understand when number precision in R is set. For this please consider the following example for (i in c(2:length(final))){ sizex <- c(sizex,(final[i]-final[i-1],digits=2))) # round is used to remove values that are too small like e-17. print(round(final[i]-final[i-1],digits=2)) } final[2]-final[1] return something like 4.440892e-16, which

On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 2:13 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 08/06/2019 7:42 a.m., Gergely Dar?czi wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I'm using "reg.finalizer" in a function that is to be called in R scripts > > to do some cleanup on success. I have not found a way to run the function > > only if the script run without

Hello, I am new and am having a hard time getting the proper syntax for output from loops. I am working on a simulation to generate a null expectation of bee behavior. Pieces of it work. The part that I am having specific difficulty is in output of a vector from within the while loop that I am using. Basically the simulation works as such: I have a starting point and a neighbor matrix and a

doc/swfdec-sections.txt | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++- libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.h | 9 ++- libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 79 ++++++++++++++-------------- test/trace/Makefile.am | 7 ++ test/trace/try-throw-in-finally-6.swf |binary

Hi, I have tagged 3.6.2-final, so testers can start building and uploading -final binaries. There was only one change between 3.6.2-rc1 and 3.6.2-final, which was a patch to the R600 backend to fix the build with VS2012. Running a full regression suite is probably not necessary, but you still can if you want to be extra careful. -Tom

>From the help/docs it is pretty clear that one could/should only assume that the 'base' namespace is available when a finalizer function is evaluated. What is not clear to me is whether you can safely attach/load packages in your finalizer function. For example, are the following finalizer functions safe? reg.finalizer(e, function(e, ...) { library("tcltk")

Hi, I've tagged the 8.0.1-rc1 release. Testers, please begin testing and upload the binaries. If you still want to have a bug fix included in the 8.0.1 final release you have until June 6 to request a fix be backported to the releases/8.0 branch. To make a request, file a bug at bugs.llvm.org and put release-8.0.1 into the 'Blocks:' field. You can also use the

I have been trying to create code to calculate the power for an adaptive design with a survival endpoint according to the method of Schafer and Muller ('Modification of the sample size and the schedule of interim analyses in survival trials based on interim inspections,' Stats in Med, 2001). This design allows for the sample size to be increased (if necessary) based on an interim look at