Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ffffffe0".
Did you mean:
ffffffe2
2005 Apr 12
3
[Bug 1014] SCP slow bandwidth with Solaris8 on n240
...==========
[SERVER1]/tmp:=> ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=1000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
bge0: flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER>
mtu 1500 index 2
inet 47.135.87.18 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 47.135.87.31
groupname imspub
bge0:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 47.135.87.20 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 47.135.87.31
bge1:
flags=69040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER,STANDBY
,INACTIVE>...
2009 Apr 30
1
snoop: no datalinks found
...find the vnic0, by default:
root at pine:~# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
vnic0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.9.59.56 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.9.59.63
ether 2:8:20:7f:a9:16
lo0: flags=2002000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv6,VIRTUAL> mtu 8252 index 1
inet6 ::1/128
root at pine:~# snoop
snoop: no datalinks found
root at pine:~# snoop -d vnic0 -o /dev/null
Using device vnic0 (promiscuous mode)
1...
2006 Oct 23
1
Polycom provision errors still! Arg!
...|3|00|Application, main: P/N=3150-11069-322
1023201556|app1 |4|00|Initial log entry.
1023201556|app1 |3|00|DNS resolver servers are 'x.x.x.x' x.x.x.x'
1023201556|app1 |3|00|DNS resolver search domain is ''
1023201556|app1 |3|00|Bootline: eim(0,0)bootHost:flash
e=172.16.27.10:ffffffe0 h=172.16.27.6 g=172.16.27.1 u=pcom pw=****
tn=CircaIP
1023201827|app1 |3|00|Time has been set from x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x).
1023201827|so |3|00|Link status is Net up Speed 100 full Duplex, PC up
Speed 100 full Duplex.
1023201833|cfg |3|00|Beginning to provision phone
1023201833|copy |3|00|'ftp...
2003 Feb 05
1
cbq.init for one port on a subnet
Sub:[LARTC] cbq init for one port on a subnet
Hello,
We use cbq.init to limit bandwidth. It works great on a per-user basis.
Now I''d like to limit traffic from a netblock to the Internet on port
6699.
Network is 192.168.0.160 mask 255.255.255.224
eth0 is the gateway
eth1 connects the netblock in question
Is this the proper syntax;
DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit
RATE=100Kbit
2002 Dec 04
3
HTB/IMQ troubles (probably)
...der 2048 key ht 800
bkt 0 flowid 60:
match c129cb80/ffffff80 at 16
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::801 order 2049 key ht 800
bkt 0 flowid 40:
match c129cb2a/ffffffff at 16
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::802 order 2050 key ht 800
bkt 0 flowid 10:
match c129cb00/ffffffe0 at 16
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::803 order 2051 key ht 800
bkt 0 flowid 10:
match c0a801aa/ffffffff at 16
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::804 order 2052 key ht 800
bkt 0 flowid 30:
match c129cb26/ffffffff at 16
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800:...