Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "fff8".
Did you mean:
fff
2013 Jan 16
2
syslinux.com 5.01 pre3
...o the root
of the destination device but not to the destination directory (they
are copied to the root of the device, but the second copy/move from
there to the specified directory may or may not be completed).
For example, in one of my attempts I received:
Invalid Opcode at 11B1 89CF 0246 BA06 FFF8 0000 0000 0000 0000 1194
0000 0000 0000
and the system hangs.
Whatever happens during the installation, when I tried to boot with
the destination device, the boot failed to complete (so it seems the
boot sector was not written by SYSLINUX.COM).
I don't know if this situation was specific...
2005 Jun 02
1
Lacing Values
...he lacing values seem to indicate where the
packet boundaries for the two of these are, is this required, or is this
just a hint?
Further, I'm seeing that the lacing values for audio packets are rather
wild. A hex string looks like: 9D 9893 FFFF 08FF FF15 5352 514E 5595
8F92 FFFF 1BFF FF11 FFF8 FF
Thats a set of lacing values for one page. Is this also giving me hints
(or perhaps an absolute) as to where to find packet boundaries?
Thanks -
Christopher
2020 Aug 03
2
LLD symbol types for defsym
I noticed that LLD doesn’t preserve the symbol type for a defsym directive. For example:
$ cat f.c
void f() {}
$ clang -c f.c
$ ld.lld -shared --defsym=g=f f.o
$ objdump -T a.out
DYNAMIC SYMBOL TABLE:
00000000000012a0 g DF .text 0000000000000006 f
00000000000012a0 g D .text 0000000000000000 g
f is marked as a function symbol, but g is not.
I recognize this is hard to do in the general
2008 Nov 13
2
decoded sample is completely differen from original one
Hi all,
I have just started playing with speex, and come up with the following code, which just encode a frame of 160 shorts, and the decode it.
For some reason the decoded sample is completely different than the original one. is my code wrong? If so what? Or is it a reasonable which depends of values that weren't correctly set?
Thanks,
Andre
#include <stdio.h>
#include
2010 Jun 07
1
111b virt-install failure
...;'vm'', [''name'', ''CentOS_48_64_92''], [''memory'', ''8192''], [''maxmem'', ''8192''], [''vcpus'', ''1''], [''uuid'', ''cc0ef9fb-95e4-fff8-4ce6-2a0d0473a3e7''], [''on_poweroff'', ''destroy''], [''on_reboot'', ''destroy''], [''on_crash'', ''destroy''], [''distro'', ''centos''], [''image'...
2020 Sep 25
1
[cfe-dev] [RFC] Backend for Motorola 6800 series CPU (M68k)
I know it's really early in the project's life, but another question I had: How does the generated 68K code perform, at least compared to modern GCC?
-- Chris