search for: faxin

...sending a fax on T38. My version information is as follows i)Asterisk 1.6.0.20 ii)res_fax-1.6.0.14_1.1.6-x86_32 iii)res_fax_digium-1.6.0.14_1.1.6-i686_32 sip.conf [general] t38pt_udptl=yes extensions.conf [default] exten => _XXXXXXXXXX,1,NoOp(Fax Incoming Call) exten => _XXXXXXXXXX,n,GoTo(faxin,${EXTEN},1) [faxin] exten => _XXXXXXXXXX,1,NoOp(This is ReceiveFAX application Testing) exten => _XXXXXXXXXX,n,Wait(6) exten => _XXXXXXXXXX,n,NoOp(******* SETTING FAXOPTS *********) exten => _XXXXXXXXXX,n,Set(FAXOPT(ecm)=yes) exten => _XXXXXXXXXX,n,Set(FAXOPT(localstationid)= 123456...

Hello, I have a noticed strange behavior in Asterisk 1.6.18.2 with ReceiveFax Digium FAX Driver: 1.6.2.0_1.3.0 (optimized for i686_32). I use a context [capi-in] for icoming ISDN calls: ====== [capi-in] ; Faxe fuer Ruben exten => 12345,1,Macro(faxin,ruben.roegels at jumping-frog.org,${EXTEN}) ====== My macro for the fax receiving looks like that: ====== [macro-faxin] ; Faxe ; ARG1 = eMail-Adresse exten => s,1,Verbose(${BOUNDARY} Eingehender Ruf von ${CALLERID(num)}) exten => s,n,Verbose(${BOUNDARY} BCHANNELINFO ${BCHANNELINFO}) ; nur v...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for your reply Larry. Le 27/07/2015 01:22, Larry Moore a ?crit : > I think the "488 Not acceptable here" is occurring because the channel > connecting through is not T.38 capable, that will be the IAX channel > from iaxmomdem. This is what T38gateway is supposed to do. And I'm very happy to report that after one more

...er) and the latest (0.0.6?) spandsp. libtiff version is 3.5.7, compiled from source. System is Slackware 10, 2.4.26 kernel, no fancy patches and processor is a P4 1.5GHz on an Intel motherboard. Most faxes are coming through fine but a few companies in particular are having very poor success faxing to us. Most faxes LOOK like they'd receive correctly, but I get this when trying to convert the TIFF to a pdf: /var/spool/asterisk/faxin/1108478035.15.tiff: TIFF directory is missing required "StripOffsets" field. What can I do to help debug this? Regards, Andrew

...FAXOPT(localstationid) : ${FAXOPT(localstationid)}) exten => receive,n,NoOp(FAXOPT(maxrate) : ${FAXOPT(maxrate)}) exten => receive,n,NoOp(FAXOPT(minrate) : ${FAXOPT(minrate)}) exten => receive,n,NoOp(**** RECEIVING FAX : ${FAXFILE} ****) exten => receive,n,ReceiveFAX(/var/spool/asterisk/faxin/${FAXFILE},dfs) exten => h,1,NoOp(FAXOPT(ecm) : ${FAXOPT(ecm)}) exten => h,n,NoOp(FAXOPT(filename) : ${FAXOPT(filename)}) exten => h,n,NoOp(FAXOPT(headerinfo) : ${FAXOPT(headerinfo)}) exten => h,n,NoOp(FAXOPT(localstationid) : ${FAXOPT(localstationid)}) exten => h,n,NoOp(FAXOPT(maxra...

I am so fed up with Digium cards. My company first owned a TE410P, I installed it in a Dell server and "enjoyed" its instability (we bought it months before Digium warned about the incompatibility issues). Then we switched to a TE411P for the hardware echo cancellation. Now we want to receive fax (< 20/day) on it and guess what ? Since April 2006 (again a few months after we bought