search for: farouk

I'm trying to build the sources from the svn trunk using VC2008, and I'm running into some problems. First, I have no idea what the configure project is for, and it fails with a manifest related error (the project lacks any .c* files anyway). This causes an avalanche of problems, initiated by TableGen not being able to build. Has anyone been successful in getting the LLVM libs to build

On 30 April 2010 11:43, Sherief N. Farouk <sherief at mganin.com> wrote: >>> I'm a software engineer. I'm terribly uncomfortable with C. > > Aaaaahahahahahahahaha Please be civil, guys. Different engineers have different skill levels, so what. If someone asks for some help with the reference implementation the...

...; and "Asterisk" Package? or i need also to other cards or packages? and if "X100P" card not suitable to VoIP, please recommend a another card, (please take in your account that i would like to connect standard analog line to the card directly). Thanks in advance Eng. Yousri Farouk www.egypt.com

.... - Sherief -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Colin Guthrie Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 9:47 AM To: speex-dev at xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Problems with Speex Resamplers 'Twas brillig, and Sherief N. Farouk at 06/12/10 14:29 did gyre and gimble: > If you can produce a simple minimal repro that exhibits this issue on some > procedural signal (sine wave, etc) I'd love to look into it some more - I'm > maintaining a hardened version of the Speex Resampler and would be very > concerned...

On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 15:03 -0400, Sherief N. Farouk wrote: > Why not add types with explicit endianess?... The issues with architecture dependency are far broader than byte order. LLVM in its current form is simply not intended to be machine neutral. Quite the contrary: it is heavily machine dependent!

From: Sherief Farouk [mailto:sherief.farouk at twisted-works.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 5:34 PM To: 'speex-dev at xiph.org' Subject: Handling allocation failure in resampler init - patch Hi, Here's a patch that stops allocation failures during resampler init from segfaulting...

> hton and ntoh intrinsics. These are needed to allow target code to > deal with endianness in a target independent way. (Ok, you could > potentially write code that detected endiannes at runtime and chose > multiversioned code based on that, but that is ugly and optimization > prohibiting). > Why not add types with explicit endianess? A trick I use for reading binary files

...em? 3. Would I be able to avoid this problem if I ran the loop in some other language like Perl or C and called the R function to do one iteration at I have noticed several postings about this sort of thing in the archives but I'm still a bit unclear. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Farouk

If you can produce a simple minimal repro that exhibits this issue on some procedural signal (sine wave, etc) I'd love to look into it some more - I'm maintaining a hardened version of the Speex Resampler and would be very concerned if this bug made it into production. - Sherief -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org] On

...all the correct ABI conforming code but the correct PDB debugging information as well. It seems much less, and easier, work to implement the support functions and run it through the standard xbox compiler as the ABI and debugging information are taken care of. On May 26, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Sherief Farouk wrote: > I'm slightly confused here, just to be clear: you're planning to go ObjC -> LLVM (via Clang or whatever) -> C, then use the 360 SDK compiler to build that, right? If that's the case, I think it'd be a better option than to use LLVM to directly generate XEXs, and y...

...rrect ABI conforming code but the correct PDB debugging information as well. It seems much less, and easier, work to implement the support functions and run it through the standard xbox compiler as the ABI and debugging information are taken care of. > > On May 26, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Sherief Farouk wrote: > >> I'm slightly confused here, just to be clear: you're planning to go ObjC -> LLVM (via Clang or whatever) -> C, then use the 360 SDK compiler to build that, right? If that's the case, I think it'd be a better option than to use LLVM to directly generate XE...

Just to be clear, nothing in the MS TCRs require that you use a certain compiler - it does, however, require that you link with the 360-specific C runtime libraries. That being said, I still believe that direct binary generation is not a feasible option, and the ObjC => C route is preferred. Kevin, hate to be asking this but do you have access to the XDK or are you just "aiming" for

I'm a software engineer. I'm terribly uncomfortable with C. I want someone to show me a simplified use of Speex decoding. FWIW I'm finally getting my head around the API but the example had me a little lost with its cryptic variable names and monolithic nature. The example I'm asking for is way simpler than the final code I will ship to production so in essence, I'm looking for

'Twas brillig, and Sherief N. Farouk at 06/12/10 14:29 did gyre and gimble: > If you can produce a simple minimal repro that exhibits this issue on some > procedural signal (sine wave, etc) I'd love to look into it some more - I'm > maintaining a hardened version of the Speex Resampler and would be very > concerned...

'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 06/12/10 15:10 did gyre and gimble: > 'Twas brillig, and Sherief N. Farouk at 06/12/10 14:52 did gyre and gimble: >> How much latency are we talking about? It seems that this issue cannot be >> easily pinpointed, but if it turns out to be related to the Speex Resampler >> let me know and I will put it on my task list. > > Will do. > > Other...

...ovide VoIP Service. what i (as hardware and software )need to provide this service? only Digium telephony card and Asterisk (Configuration Package)? am i need to any other getway , hardware or software? if any 1 have complete solution, please provide me it. thanks in advance Regards Eng. Yousri Farouk Linux System administrator www.egypt.com

Hello all, i would like to configure TDM11B with Asterisk, if any one have the configuration steps please provide me it. Thanks in advance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050208/1f6dfabe/attachment.htm

> I could add that to my CMake build system TODO, but so far I'm a bit > skeptic about LLVM relevance on the non-Unix world. The Windows build > can be broken for a long period before anyone notices. The VS2003 > support is broken since a long time ago and, apart from myself, no > other > user cares. Seems that LLVM penetration on Windows, for instance, is > almost nil. Is

Hi, I've noticed that the opus-tools is using a really old version of Speex's resampler code - a version that I've seen fail in the wild first-hand under low resource circumstances. I've actually submitted patches for some issues in the Speex resampler a while ago (and IIRC they were accepted): http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2009-November/007541.html ,

As a followup to a previous posting regarding the win.metafile() function, I've been having some problems as well. In my case, I've been converting some scripts from S-SPLUS to R that create graphs in order to take advantage of R's plotmath capabilities. In the sample code shown below, the axis labels display the units for the data. In particular, the units for the y axis are