search for: famill

This is a fairly long problem, but one I run into often. This may be a problem in statistics, not R, in which case I shouldn't expect an answer. The punch line is at the end (III). The rest is motivational background. Forgive any idiocy. ------- In an experiment, suppose, each of 100 subjects reads 20 cases and rates their familiarity and emotion (how emotion-arousing they are). I want

Dear all, I am having some problems trying to run a GLMM model with zero-inflation using the alpha version of glmmADMB (0.6.4) using R (2.13.1) in Windows and I would greatly appreciate some help. My count response variable (number of birds: count) fits a negative binomial distribution and the explanatory variables are both continuous and categorical (species= 17). The three random effects are

Cheers all, TL;DR version: I've recently found that at least on my test box the `LISTEN *` line had only set up an IPv4 `0.0.0.0` listener but not an IPv6 `::0` listener for `upsd`. In fact, at least on a "dual-stack" system, it seems impossible to bind to both - so depending on binding order I either lose IPv6 or lose IPv4 directly (but have it practically as IPv4-over-IPv6).

Cheers all, TL;DR version: I've recently found that at least on my test box the `LISTEN *` line had only set up an IPv4 `0.0.0.0` listener but not an IPv6 `::0` listener for `upsd`. In fact, at least on a "dual-stack" system, it seems impossible to bind to both - so depending on binding order I either lose IPv6 or lose IPv4 directly (but have it practically as IPv4-over-IPv6).

Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > I've recently found that at least on my test box the `LISTEN *` line had > only set up an IPv4 `0.0.0.0` listener but not an IPv6 `::0` listener for > `upsd`. Interesting. On one system I checked, I have 4 explicit directives for 127.0.0.1, ::1, and the LAN on v4/v6. On another, I have an empty

Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > I've recently found that at least on my test box the `LISTEN *` line had > only set up an IPv4 `0.0.0.0` listener but not an IPv6 `::0` listener for > `upsd`. Interesting. On one system I checked, I have 4 explicit directives for 127.0.0.1, ::1, and the LAN on v4/v6. On another, I have an empty

My guess is `area under the ROC curve'. There's the roc package in BioConductor that I believe can compute this. Andy > From: Spencer Graves > > What's AUC? If you mean AIC (Akaike Information > Criterion), and > if you fit logistic regression using "glm", the help file > says that glm > returns an object of class "glm", which is

What would be a good combination to use on dialup connections? I know iax is better than SIP, but I dont' know much of anything about the various codecs. Also, how well would an iax or sip solution work compared to skype as far as voice quality? If it helps, here is what I'm trying to do. We know about 30 different families in one area in Russia that have relatives here in the US.

Dear R-helper, I would like to compare the AUC of two logistic regression models (same population). Is it possible with R ? Thank you Roman Rouzier [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On 10 March 2010 16:57, 琬菁楊 <ching1119.cs96 at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > I think the main issue is that EFI C dialect is not ANSI-C compliant: the > size of pointer is determined at the run-time and therefore the layout of > the structure is not static. Does LLVM support this model? Hi Ching, The LLVM IR doesn't care about the size of your pointers, and this is why you have the

Hello all, I am highly interestd in implementing C compiler for EFI Byte Code in LLVM and participate in Google Summer Code. EFI is a much larger, more complex,OS-like replacement for the older BIOS firmware interface present in all IBM PC-compatible personal computers. and the EFI specification provides for a processor-independent device driver environment(like virtualmachine), called EFI Byte

Thanks to everyone for a fruitful discussion, links and ideas. The result is nearing a merge at https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/2013 and seems to not upset CI on any platform, including Windows (which behaves funny WRT binding to the same host:port as many times as you ask). Ultimately the chosen logic is that if there was a `LISTEN * <port>` in `upsd.conf`, the depending on

Thanks to everyone for a fruitful discussion, links and ideas. The result is nearing a merge at https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/2013 and seems to not upset CI on any platform, including Windows (which behaves funny WRT binding to the same host:port as many times as you ask). Ultimately the chosen logic is that if there was a `LISTEN * <port>` in `upsd.conf`, the depending on

Hi, Thanks to everyone involved in the Xen project. I think it is great and can''t wait to get my hands dirty with it. In the meantime, I cannot boot Dom0 on an ibm x335 and I am not sure what the problem is. Any insights are welcome. Here is what my grub.conf file looks like: title Fedora Core (2.6.8-1.521) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.8-1.521 ro root=/dev/sda9

Dear R-help, A colleague of mine was running some code on two of our boxes, and noticed a rather large difference in running time. We've so far isolated the problem to the difference between R 1.7.1 and 1.8.0, but not more than that. The exact same code took 933.5 seconds in 1.7.1, and 3594.4 seconds in 1.8.1, on the same box. Basically, the code calls boot() to bootstrap fitting mixture

Geoffrey Scott wrote: > Geoffrey Scott wrote: >> Question: >> How can I stop users from being prompted for a password? This was when they accessed their own homes share. I found that when the user accessed other shares everything was fine. So this morning I finally realized that it had to be my home shares stanza. It *seems* that valid users = %S is not enough that it has to be

** Delivery incomplete ** There was a temporary problem delivering your message to curtiskwong101 at gmail.com. Gmail will retry for 47 more hours. You'll be notified if the delivery fails permanently. The response was: Receive rate too high -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, i am really depressed at this moment. I set up an domain controller using samba4 and an raspberry pi. I can join the domain and everything works BUT kerberos has some strange problems resolving my raspberry hostname. First of all some information: Raspberry pi is DHCP Server and DNS-Server (BIND9). First of all the configurations: Code: /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf # Global

Hi, /etc/resolv.conf looks exactly like this: domain family.rapsberry.local search family.rapsberry.local nameserver 192.168.178.222 So to answer your question: yes the only Nameserver the raspberry has is itself. Greetings Am 2015-01-03 um 7:40 PM schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 03/01/15 16:31, Robert Hartmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i am really depressed at this moment. I set

Hi, thank you so! much. Turning off avahi daemon was the solution! rapsberry instead of raspberry is a typo during porivision actually. Thank you again :) I will write an entry on my blog to make sure that does not happen again. One last time for google bots. IF you receive kinit: Cannot contact any KDC for realm while getting initial credentials make sure you don't run avahi However