search for: fallthroughs

...files); @files = grep(!/\.(?:dtsi?|rst|config)$/, @files); @files = grep(/\.[ch]$/, @files); @files = sort @files; @files = uniq(@files); $cvt_files = join(' ', @files); print("files: <$cvt_files>\n"); next if (scalar(@files) < 1); # Convert fallthroughs for all [.ch] files in the section print("doing cvt_fallthrough.pl -- $cvt_files\n"); `cvt_fallthrough.pl -- $cvt_files`; # If nothing changed, nothing to commit `git diff-index --quiet HEAD --`; next if (!$?); # Commit the changes my $fh; open($fh, "+>...

...files); @files = grep(!/\.(?:dtsi?|rst|config)$/, @files); @files = grep(/\.[ch]$/, @files); @files = sort @files; @files = uniq(@files); $cvt_files = join(' ', @files); print("files: <$cvt_files>\n"); next if (scalar(@files) < 1); # Convert fallthroughs for all [.ch] files in the section print("doing cvt_fallthrough.pl -- $cvt_files\n"); `cvt_fallthrough.pl -- $cvt_files`; # If nothing changed, nothing to commit `git diff-index --quiet HEAD --`; next if (!$?); # Commit the changes my $fh; open($fh, "+>...

...files); @files = grep(!/\.(?:dtsi?|rst|config)$/, @files); @files = grep(/\.[ch]$/, @files); @files = sort @files; @files = uniq(@files); $cvt_files = join(' ', @files); print("files: <$cvt_files>\n"); next if (scalar(@files) < 1); # Convert fallthroughs for all [.ch] files in the section print("doing cvt_fallthrough.pl -- $cvt_files\n"); `cvt_fallthrough.pl -- $cvt_files`; # If nothing changed, nothing to commit `git diff-index --quiet HEAD --`; next if (!$?); # Commit the changes my $fh; open($fh, "+>...

...files); @files = grep(!/\.(?:dtsi?|rst|config)$/, @files); @files = grep(/\.[ch]$/, @files); @files = sort @files; @files = uniq(@files); $cvt_files = join(' ', @files); print("files: <$cvt_files>\n"); next if (scalar(@files) < 1); # Convert fallthroughs for all [.ch] files in the section print("doing cvt_fallthrough.pl -- $cvt_files\n"); `cvt_fallthrough.pl -- $cvt_files`; # If nothing changed, nothing to commit `git diff-index --quiet HEAD --`; next if (!$?); # Commit the changes my $fh; open($fh, "+>...

...files); @files = grep(!/\.(?:dtsi?|rst|config)$/, @files); @files = grep(/\.[ch]$/, @files); @files = sort @files; @files = uniq(@files); $cvt_files = join(' ', @files); print("files: <$cvt_files>\n"); next if (scalar(@files) < 1); # Convert fallthroughs for all [.ch] files in the section print("doing cvt_fallthrough.pl -- $cvt_files\n"); `cvt_fallthrough.pl -- $cvt_files`; # If nothing changed, nothing to commit `git diff-index --quiet HEAD --`; next if (!$?); # Commit the changes my $fh; open($fh, "+>...

Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars at kernel.org> ---

Hi. I upgraded my main build host and the clang -Werror builds started failing. This is because clang 10's -Wimplicit-fallthrough doesn't understand /* FALLTHROUGH */ but rather requires __attribute__((fallthrough)): clang -Wall -O2 [...] -Wimplicit-fallthrough [...] -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c /openbsd-compat/base64.c

fallthrough to a separate case/default label break; isn't very readable. Convert pseudo-keyword fallthrough; statements to a simple break; when the next label is case or default and the only statement in the next label block is break; Found using: $ grep-2.5.4 -rP --include=*.[ch] -n "fallthrough;(\s*(case\s+\w+|default)\s*:\s*){1,7}break;" * Miscellanea: o Move or coalesce a

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 03:31, Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars at kernel.org> wrote: > > Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with > the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary > fall-through markings when it is the case. I really like this! I was not a fan of explicitly marking those with comments. Thank you, taken in my

Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided to make a formal proposal and post it here. I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for specifying intended fall-through locations between switch cases. *INTRODUCTION* The switch construct of C/C++ languages allows fall-throughs between switch labels when control flow is not directed

Many warnings are encountered with GCC 10. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu> --- usr/dash/eval.c | 2 +- usr/klibc/zlib/infback.c | 2 +- usr/klibc/zlib/inflate.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/usr/dash/eval.c b/usr/dash/eval.c index dd144948a9fa..6b2b01e19a47 100644 ---

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:1434:53: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough.

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu>wrote: > Hey Alex, > > Sorry if this is a silly question... are you asking if anyone "wants the > functionality proposed" or "wants to write the code for the functionality > proposed"? > *-Wimplicit-fallthrough* diagnostic is already implemented, and the patch in this thread

Hi all, This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang. In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, explicitly add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case. Notice that in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, this change[1]

Hi all, This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang. In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, explicitly add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case. Notice that in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, this change[1]

Hi all, This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang. In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, explicitly add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case. Notice that in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, this change[1]

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:30:40 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:21:39 -0600 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > > This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in > > > > order to enable

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:30:40 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:21:39 -0600 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > > This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in > > > > order to enable

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:30:40 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:21:39 -0600 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > > This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in > > > > order to enable

I've ran across an issue in BranchFolding.cpp where it is incorrectly folding a branch to the wrong fallthrough location. This is in LLVM 2.4 and seems to be in 2.5 also. The code in question is: void BranchFolder::OptimizeBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) { MachineFunction::iterator FallThrough = MBB; ++FallThrough; // If this block is empty, make everyone use its fall-through, not