search for: fallacies

Thank you. Alexei just committed the change to SVN. Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > LGTM. > Please commit. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Marco Leogrande <marcol at plumgrid.com> > wrote: >> >> Galina...

...ve added the new builder under _get_experimental_scheduled_builders(), as the comment above that function suggested me it would be a good idea. :) Does it look a reasonable start? Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Marco Leogrande <marcol at plumgrid.com> wrote: > Hi Galina, > > thanks for the info! > > I think we will go for the "LLVM+clang with cmake" approach, since the > BPF target has been marked non-experimental in the...

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2007-024 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Product | Zaptel | |--------------------+---------------------------------------------------| | Summary | Potential buffer overflow from command line | | |

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2007-024 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Product | Zaptel | |--------------------+---------------------------------------------------| | Summary | Potential buffer overflow from command line | | |

..._BUILD=BPF ../path/to/src/ > make -jX > ./bin/llvm-lit test/CodeGen/BPF/ > > > Any suggestion would be appreciated. > > Thanks! > > Regards, > > Marco Leogrande > > Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, > inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Marco Leogrande <marcol at plumgrid.com> > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I am working with Alexei Starovoitov to contribute an LLVM buildbot > > for the experimental BPF backend. > > I am following the st...

...e. * Also, is there a way to test these changes in zorg in a local environment before submitting the patch for review? Thank you! [1] http://llvm.org/docs/HowToAddABuilder.html Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions.

I need to point out the this is factually misleading and materially false: "I think this, being the basis of your whole argument, is the fallacy. S/S is forcing people to take responsibility, for sure, but carriers won't just let their customers leave because they don't want to sign calls. It will force them to make sure they know who their customers are, and make it impossible for

On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Peter Duffy wrote: > No one is saying that sysvinit is perfect. What I can't grasp is why > replace it with something which is no less imperfect, and is almost > certainly worse in at least some respects - and to make that replacement > unavoidable and mandatory. Distros weighed up the advantages and disadvantages, and made a decision as to what they thought

a specification will _eventually_ be used, by someone, to tell the user they are doing things "wrong", won't it? and doesn't that turn markdown's genesis upside-down? heck, next thing you know we'll be telling them to r.t.f.m. i would prefer that implementers get more sophisticated about teasing out the user's intent in "ambiguous" cases. of course,

> > There is no doubt that most security agencies have a long list of zero- >> day exploits in their toolbox - I would hazard to suggest that they >> wouldn't be doing their job if they didn't! But I seriously doubt they >> would commission exploitable code in something that is openly >> auditable. >> >> P. >> > > P., I used to think

Could anyone tell me where can I find some examples of the applications to economics of a Markov chain? Many thanks in advance. Luis Rivera. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not

On a few occasions, Daniel has mentioned running a LNT instances from a PaaS cloud. A while back I decided to see if that is possible. I am happy to report it is. In r210134 I made the necessary changes to allow LNT to run on the Heroku PaaS cloud. https://www.heroku.com The commit is all configuration changes to instruct the cloud on how to run the app. I have a live instance of LNT here:

On 29 July 2016 at 15:26, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I believe David Chisnall up-thread cited a difference in checkout times > on the order of a handful of seconds versus a couple of minutes. While > naively it might seem not a big deal, over time and depending on what you > are trying to do yes it can be a big burden. TL;DR: This thread

I have installed ninja and retriggered that build. I will monitor the results to confirm it succeeds. Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 31 October 2016 at 19:46, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: >> I applied it and reconfigured the master. > > Thanks Galina! > > Marco, the build...

I just discovered something interesting: node server.example.org { class A { ... } } The above doesn''t do anything. node server.example.org { include A class A { ... } } The above works. I was under the impression that classes defined within a node were assumed to be part of that node. I learned something new today. -- Digant C Kasundra

On 31 October 2016 at 19:46, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > I applied it and reconfigured the master. Thanks Galina! Marco, the build is complaining about Ninja: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-bpf-build/builds/414/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio CMake was unable to find a build program corresponding to "Ninja" Now I remember we used ninja by

I remember reading about post hoc statistical power on R-help. But I can't seem to find them with RSiteSearch("post hoc statistical power") and variations of it. I would like to learn more about post hoc statistical power, its meaningfulness, advantages and disadvantages. I thought the issue was settled after Tukey's 1993 paper about post hoc statistical power being

While you can go the route of changing master to main or something similar, you're up for a circlejerk you can not win. If you change technically established terms each time someone gets offended, this will never end. As a comparison, when studying in europe, you do your Master-Degree. In Germany, when you finish your apprenticeship as carpenter and do the next level, to actually lead with

DeaRs, i'm looking for some references on a statement as follows: "Humans are good at spotting trends and patterns in data, but they are also good at spotting those patterns where none really exist". This is not verbatim but there must be some scholarly work on this. I can't remember where I came across it - perhaps I dreamed it up? Help, anyone? Best wishes Paul -- View this

Hi, This is not the purpose of my distro. The purpose of my distro is to account for complexity lock-in and to remove this as much as possible. This complexity is usually performed in 2 ways: - ultra costly languages/runtime to implement (c++/java...), and I don't think "ultra" is a word big enough. - multiplication of script languages