I need to point out the this is factually misleading and materially false: "I think this, being the basis of your whole argument, is the fallacy. S/S is forcing people to take responsibility, for sure, but carriers won't just let their customers leave because they don't want to sign calls. It will force them to make sure they know who their customers are, and make it impossible for those customers to escape consequences if they misbehave." There is Law of The Land that is about to take effect. Use google and search "stir shaken" Whoever thinks I am exaggerated is dreaming. Also: it is true that my service is the only one for asterisk --worldwide. The model proposed by Transexus (302 redirect with a new header) can't be used by Asterisk. But don't take my word for it: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28924>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20200714/904a2017/attachment.html>
From: asterisk-users <asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com> On Behalf Of Saint Michael Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 2:35 PM To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Stir Shaken I need to point out the this is factually misleading and materially false: "I think this, being the basis of your whole argument, is the fallacy. S/S is forcing people to take responsibility, for sure, but carriers won't just let their customers leave because they don't want to sign calls. It will force them to make sure they know who their customers are, and make it impossible for those customers to escape consequences if they misbehave." There is Law of The Land that is about to take effect. Use google and search "stir shaken" Whoever thinks I am exaggerated is dreaming. Also: it is true that my service is the only one for asterisk --worldwide. The model proposed by Transexus (302 redirect with a new header) can't be used by Asterisk. But don't take my word for it: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28924 I need to point out again that this is not the forum for your business proposition. Please take it to the business list. --Don -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20200714/19c78597/attachment.html>
This sounds like the kind of business I can trust with my calls, and am eager to buy from. Oozing with professionalism. Well done sir! :) From: asterisk-users [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of dk at donkelly.biz Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 4:48 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Stir Shaken From: asterisk-users <asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com <mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com> > On Behalf Of Saint Michael Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 2:35 PM To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com <mailto:asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Subject: [asterisk-users] Stir Shaken I need to point out the this is factually misleading and materially false: "I think this, being the basis of your whole argument, is the fallacy. S/S is forcing people to take responsibility, for sure, but carriers won't just let their customers leave because they don't want to sign calls. It will force them to make sure they know who their customers are, and make it impossible for those customers to escape consequences if they misbehave." There is Law of The Land that is about to take effect. Use google and search "stir shaken" Whoever thinks I am exaggerated is dreaming. Also: it is true that my service is the only one for asterisk --worldwide. The model proposed by Transexus (302 redirect with a new header) can't be used by Asterisk. But don't take my word for it: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28924 I need to point out again that this is not the forum for your business proposition. Please take it to the business list. --Don -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20200714/e1fd3c66/attachment.html>
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:36 PM Saint Michael <venefax at gmail.com> wrote:> I need to point out the this is factually misleading and materially false: > "I think this, being the basis of your whole argument, is the fallacy. > S/S is forcing people to take responsibility, for sure, but carriers > won't just let their customers leave because they don't want to sign > calls. It will force them to make sure they know who their customers > are, and make it impossible for those customers to escape consequences if > they misbehave." > > There is Law of The Land that is about to take effect. Use google and > search "stir shaken" Whoever thinks I am exaggerated is dreaming. Also: it > is true that my service is the only one for asterisk --worldwide. The model > proposed by Transexus (302 redirect with a new header) can't be used by > Asterisk. > But don't take my word for it: > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28924 >Please consider this your third and final warning for continuing to promote your offering on the asterisk-users mailing list. It is acceptable on the asterisk-biz[1] mailing list but not here. If you continue your account may be removed from this mailing list. [1] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz -- Joshua C. Colp Asterisk Technical Lead Sangoma Technologies Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20200715/db938267/attachment.html>