search for: fall

Hi all, This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang. In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, explicitly add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case. Notice that in order to enable -Wimplic...

Hi all, This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang. In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, explicitly add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case. Notice that in order to enable -Wimplic...

Hi all, This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang. In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, explicitly add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case. Notice that in order to enable -Wimplic...

...[6] " 10001 01/09/1986 11 GREAT FALLS GAS CO -5.75000 14160" [7] " 10001 01/10/1986 11 GREAT FALLS GAS CO...

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch aims to suppress 29 missing-break-in-switch false positives. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1456891 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1324063 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID...

Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gust...

Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided to make a formal proposal and post it here. I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for specifying intended fall-through locations between switch cases. *INTRODUCTION* The switch construct of C/C++ languages allows fall-throughs between switch labels when control flow is not directed elsewhere by a break, return or continue statement or other ways. There are certain...

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo at embeddedor.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/hdmi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/usernv04.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/...

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 03:31, Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars at kernel.org> wrote: > > Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with > the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary > fall-through markings when it is the case. I really like this! I was not a fan of explicitly marking those with comments. Thank you, taken in my tree. Ben. > > [1] http...

Hi, Friendly ping: Who can take this? Thanks -- Gustavo On 10/17/18 9:28 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > This patch aims to suppress 29 missing-break-in-switch false positives. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1456891 ("Missing break in switch") > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1324063 ("Missing break in switc...

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 Notice that, in some cases, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrou...

...8:53 PM, Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu>wrote: > Hey Alex, > > Sorry if this is a silly question... are you asking if anyone "wants the > functionality proposed" or "wants to write the code for the functionality > proposed"? > *-Wimplicit-fallthrough* diagnostic is already implemented, and the patch in this thread is a portability macro for *[[clang::fallthrough]]*attribute (which is also implemented, of course). I only need an approval from community to add this macro and replace comment-only fall-through annotations with the *LLVM_FALL...

I am trying to model data in which subjects are followed through time to determine if they fall, or do not fall. Some of the subjects fall once, some fall several times. Follow-up time varies from subject to subject. I know how to model time to the first fall (e.g. Cox Proportional Hazards, Kaplan-Meir analyses, etc.) but I am not sure how I can model the data if I include the data for those...

...2001 Spring 849 Lower 0.056 21.1753 15.5626 8.12344 2 CF0101 2001 Spring 849 Lower 0.103 21.3264 15.5511 8.11873 3 CF0101 2001 Spring 849 Lower 0.131 21.4780 15.5492 8.10568 4 CF0101 2001 Spring 849 Lower 0.169 21.5296 15.5492 8.10633 .... 15000 CF0103 2001 Fall 929 Mid 14.449 17.692 22.901 7.743 15001 CF0103 2001 Fall 929 Mid 14.478 17.691 22.900 7.743 15002 CF0103 2001 Fall 929 Mid 14.527 17.692 22.899 7.743 15003 CF0103 2001 Fall 929 Mid 14.595 17.692 22.900 7.743 15004 CF0103 2001 Fall 92...

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:08 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo at embeddedor.com> wrote: > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch > cases where we are expecting to fall through. > > Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 > > Notice that, in some cases, the code comment is modified > in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. > > This patch is part of the ongoing e...

...geom_line() + geom_point(size=3.5) + scale_y_continuous(breaks=seq(0, 100, 10), limits=c(0, 100), labels=paste(seq(0, 100, 10), "%", sep="")) + scale_color_manual(values=c("orange", "red"), breaks=c("PCT_ENR_FALL1", "PCT_ENR_FALL2"), labels=c("1st fall", "2nd fall")) + scale_fill_manual(values=c("orange", "red"), breaks=c("PCT_ENR_FALL1", "PCT_ENR_FALL2"), labels=c("...

Hello all, I cannot seem to figure out this seemingly simple procedure. I want to sort a data frame by a specified character vector. So for : df.. <- data.frame(Season=rep(c("Summer","Fall","Winter","Spring"),4),Obs= runif(length(rep(c("Summer","Fall","Winter","Spring"),4)))) I want to sort the data frame by the seasons but in the order I specify since alphapetically would not put the season in sequential order I trie...

...are about the method used. Any suggestions to obtain predictions with se's from an nlme would be appreciated. eal R Version 2.2.1 (2005-12-20 r36812) mac osx 10.4.5 on G5 DP > predict(kew11.nlme,x.for.lw.pred, se=T) Error in predict.nlme(kew11.nlme, x.for.lw.pred, se = T) : Levels 1. Fall-Winter,2. Spring,3. Summer,4. Fall not allowed for Season > x.for.lw.pred[1:10,] Season ecoreg MBreed ageyr2 sheep farm 1 1. Fall-Winter desert Meat 0.60 1 AksToKa 2 2. Spring desert Meat 1.00 1 AksToKa 3 3. Summer desert Meat 1...

...;> >> There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided >> to make a formal proposal and post it here. >> > >> > I missed the earlier discussion, so I'm sorry for chiming in late. >> > >> >> I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for specifying intended >> fall-through locations between switch cases. >> > >> > I don't really see that the tradeoff here is worthwhile. It is >> possible that we have some fallthrough bugs, but the cost of sprinkling >> this macro everywhere...

...was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've >>> decided to make a formal proposal and post it here. >>> > >>> > I missed the earlier discussion, so I'm sorry for chiming in late. >>> > >>> >> I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for specifying intended >>> fall-through locations between switch cases. >>> > >>> > I don't really see that the tradeoff here is worthwhile. It is >>> possible that we have some fallthrough bugs, but the cost of sprinkling >>> th...