search for: facto

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 389 matches for "facto".

Did you mean: fact
2012 Jan 21
1
Function for multiple t tests
...es among two groups, and I would like to skip the tedious process of collecting information to assemble a table, but I am not sure if the function I want already exists. Any suggestion would be appreciated. I have a working example, as required by the posting guide: my_swiss = swiss[-1,] my_swiss$facto = rep(1:2,nrow(my_swiss)/2) t.test(Fertility~facto,data=my_swiss) by(my_swiss$Fertility,my_swiss$facto, sd) t.test(Agriculture~facto,data=my_swiss) by(my_swiss$Agriculture,my_swiss$facto, sd) ttable <- function(formula, data) { ???? } ttable(Fertility + Agriculture ~ facto, data=my_swiss) fa...
2020 Jan 14
3
[cfe-dev] Phabricator -> GitHub PRs?
...dn't miss a thing. +1. I still find Phab to be inscrutable. I don't use any of its advanced features. I'm a long-time contributor. I can't imagine how difficult it is for folks new to the project. For all of GitHub's many flaws, its very strong advantage is that it is a de facto standard. People understand it. -David
2020 Jan 15
2
[cfe-dev] Phabricator -> GitHub PRs?
...tune with GitHub, then their PR system will (obviously) be far more suitable. What I'm asking is that we review both together. Current process with Phab versus a GitHub process with GitHub PR. > > For all of GitHub's many flaws, its very strong advantage is that it is > > a de facto standard. People understand it. > > I do not. Arguably because I have not yet used it. He said "most people". He is right, even if you don't, personally. Git PR (GitHub, GitLab, Gerrit) is indeed the de facto standard. > However, "it is a de facto standard" is a...
2014 Jul 17
4
[LLVMdev] MCJIT code owner nomination
...code owner of the MCJIT, RuntimeDyld and JIT event listener components. For those who don't know, I am the current code owner, but I have not had the time recently to make the level of contributions I had in the past while Lang has been doing outstanding work in this area and has taken on a de facto leadership role in guiding MCJIT development. If there are no objections, I'd like to hand the reins over to him. Thanks, Andy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140717/1bf13d48/attachment...
2020 Apr 12
3
CentOS 8 NIS
...ally never have to touch it - all configuration is done through processes interacting with the server, including provisioning accounts and so on - even the initial configuration is done by talking to the server. There are other options than LDAP, and servers other than OpenLDAP, but LDAP is the de facto standard. P.
2008 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] CMake builds clang.
...sary. (This doesn't look >> *that* hard, but I can't say when I'll surface long enough to work on that.) >> > > In theory, it is possible to do this with cmake itself. In practice, it > doesn't matter much because: > > 1) either CMake becomes the de facto standard for LLVM, deprecating > autoconf&&gmake and thus requiring the developers to update the > CMakeLists.txt files to compile their sources... > Sorry, but this is a noticeable obstacle for CMake becoming the de-facto standard for LLVM. From the existence of the dependen...
2008 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] CMake builds clang.
...dates the CMakeLists.txt files when necessary. (This doesn't look > *that* hard, but I can't say when I'll surface long enough to work on that.) In theory, it is possible to do this with cmake itself. In practice, it doesn't matter much because: 1) either CMake becomes the de facto standard for LLVM, deprecating autoconf&&gmake and thus requiring the developers to update the CMakeLists.txt files to compile their sources... 2) ... or CMake remains a fall-back system for those not covered by autoconf&&gmake, with most LLVM developers ignoring it and requiring s...
2008 Oct 26
3
[LLVMdev] CMake builds clang.
Óscar Fuentes wrote: > "Anton Korobeynikov" <asl at math.spbu.ru> writes: > > >>> at all, it would be great if you reflect your changes on the file list >>> inside the corresponding CMakeLists.txt when you add, remove or rename >>> a .cpp file. >>> >> Isn't is possible for cmake just to glob everything in the
2015 Mar 05
2
[LLVMdev] Register allocation code owner
I haven't been able to spend much time with LLVM's register allocators lately, so I think it would make sense for somebody else to take over as the regalloc code owner. Quentin has volunteered for the job; he has been the de facto code owner for the last couple of years. Let's make it official. Thanks, /jakob
2008 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
...re of a precompiled MinGW binary for expect, > although it might be in one of the more obscure packages). I'd be > interested in a successful build (with patches) for expect myself About two years ago, ActiveState added the Windows port of Expect to its Tcl distribution, which is the de-facto canonical source of Tcl/Tk for Windows users. Check www.activestate.com [snip] -- Oscar
2015 Feb 06
2
Another big fish to support FLAC
...framework) without having to install any plugins. Support for metadata is still limited, but this might improve before the final release. Microsoft has also announced that FLAC will be supported for Windows Phone 10. I'd say this might be another step for FLAC to become even more of a de facto standard than it already is.
2013 Jul 31
2
[LLVMdev] Proposing a new 'alloca' parameter attribute to implement the Microsoft C++ ABI
...odeWarrior supported it (as Howard Hinnant might well remember), before Metrowerks sold off their x86 compiler backend. In fact, other than GCC, only Borland and Watcom don't support it, and that's only because they originally developed theirs during the DOS era, before MSVC++ became the de facto standard compiler. (But Watcom also used to support MFC development on Windows, so they might have supported it at one point, too.) > so I am > genuinely curious why there is so much effort being spent on the more > esoteric portions of the ABI? Because the sad truth is, the Microsoft ABI...
2015 Feb 27
4
users of dbox format
I am interested in finding out your experiences with using the dbox format (especially mdbox) if you use this format. I am contemplating changing my maildir setup to mdbox but I still need to make a case for it against maildir which has become a de-facto standard and provides sort of a secure basis in case of software changes. Your input will be appreciated. -- Andreas Kasenides Senior IT Officer Dept. of Computer Science, University of Cyprus Tel: 22892714, Fax: 22892701 (5B4ANK)
2008 Jan 26
3
REvolution
...m/capital/news/releases/080122.htm "Intel Capital, the global investment arm of Intel Corporation, today announced that it has invested in the Series A financing of REvolution Computing, creator of parallel computing software for computational statistics" "R has become the de-facto statistical language and REvolution Computing's R-based solutions provide the necessary scale and support for its growing commercial usage,? said Andre M. Boisvert, Revolution Computing board member. ?With this investment, Revolution Computing can deliver the type of performance that ha...
2020 Jan 14
5
[cfe-dev] Phabricator -> GitHub PRs?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 09:56:53PM +0000, Renato Golin via cfe-dev wrote: > GitHub PR is the "de facto standard", everyone knows, the entry cost > is practically zero. The UI is lean and missing features, but the > large availability of tooling (either targeting GitHub directly or > plain git) makes up for a lot of it. Just like with the "Everyone knows git", I call bullshit...
2012 Sep 04
3
Tendonitis and R users
Hello This request asks something beyond the technicalities of the R language, I would like to ask you wonderful people if you have ever suffered as programmers ( or de facto programmers like myself though I am a 'research assistant') from tendonitis and how you coped with it, i have golfer's elbow on both sides. Any resources? Pancho Mulongeni Namibia
2013 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] Proposing a new 'alloca' parameter attribute to implement the Microsoft C++ ABI
> Right. What's the point of all the effort devoted to MSVC++ ABI > compatibility when Clang doesn't need it for being a top-notch C++ > compiler on Windows? I brought up a similar point a little bit earlier, too.... It seems like the only necessary condition for being a first-class native-code development tool on Windows is to support the platform C ABI and the subset of the
2019 Nov 18
2
[RFC] Create llvm/lib/Frontend
...to just > construct the appropriate Clang types and call those APIs. The main motivation is to have ABI-emitting code (in particular for OpenMP) shared between clang and flang. This structure would require flang to have a dependency on clang, but conceptually they are independent frontends. De facto, every platform has its ABI defined in terms of C therefore this would effectively required every frontend to depend on clang. I'd think of the platform ABI to be independent of the parsing implementation. Michael
2005 Nov 18
3
[OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
...ed headless linux targets live in isolated networks, even relative to other computer or network equipment at the target site. At times, the nearest land is 2 miles straight down (ocean floor). 3: These targets are also without anything resembling a linux-aware operator and (ipso facto) must generate NO mail and self-limiting logs of a "usually ignored' type. from the above, SELinux offers me *nothing* I need and costs me something for which there is no reward. Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 >>> thebs413 at earthlink.net 1...
2013 Jul 29
2
[LLVMdev] Proposing a new 'alloca' parameter attribute to implement the Microsoft C++ ABI
Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes: > On 29/07/13 15:30, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >>>> object in place on the stack or at least call its copy constructor. >>> >>> >>> what does GCC do? >> Nothing. It does not support MSVC ABI. > > Maybe we shouldn't either :) Right. What's the point of all the effort devoted to MSVC++