Displaying 20 results from an estimated 28 matches for "facetious".
2011 Sep 03
0
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
...opaque right now. That's why I hope to get people
>>> talking so we can find out where everyone is and go from there.
>>
>> Yet, there's surprisingly little complaint about Subversion around here,
>> which is kinda unfortunate :)
>
> I know you're being facetious, but why is it unfortunate?
Because you're missing so much.
> I still don't know what a "ref" or "object" is.)
Fortunately, that's about the only thing in a git repository, so there's
not much more to learn :)
2011 Sep 03
6
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
...but it all seems very opaque right now. That's why I hope to get people
>> talking so we can find out where everyone is and go from there.
>
> Yet, there's surprisingly little complaint about Subversion around here,
> which is kinda unfortunate :)
I know you're being facetious, but why is it unfortunate? SVN serves our workflow very well. The versioning system should get out of the way of development; it shouldn't "pull focus." SVN doesn't require you to spend a lot of time learning it and adapting to its way of doing things. (The learning curve for SVN...
2011 Sep 03
5
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
...9;s why I hope to get people
>>>> talking so we can find out where everyone is and go from there.
>>>
>>> Yet, there's surprisingly little complaint about Subversion around here,
>>> which is kinda unfortunate :)
>>
>> I know you're being facetious, but why is it unfortunate?
>
> Because you're missing so much.
I read Dave's document. It lists (rather complex) ways to use it, but it doesn't list why any of them are needed for our workflow. That would go more towards convincing me that it's a good thing.
> > I st...
2005 Nov 15
4
Fosdem : Developers Room, Presence
hi everyone,
This mail will mostly interest europeans Rubyists/Railists, but others
are welcome to read it, answer and participate too :)
In next February the Sixth Fosdem (Free and OpenSource Developers''
European Meeting) will be held in Brussels, Belgium. Like each year
there is some special rooms for projects/communities (mozilla, drupal,
kde, gnome, python, openbsd, perl, linux,
1997 Apr 30
1
R-beta: Re: S Compatibility
...try to do too.
>
>However, I suspect though that most people don't know that there is a
>difference, and these days so few people can get access to the non-plussed
>version, I wonder how important it is to make the distinction. :-(
How important is it to avoid being sued, or less facetiously, what is
the legal status of R? If I were Mathsoft I would be less than pleased
at the development of R and would try to stop it if I could. I have
been wondering for some time if this is possible. But I am not a lawyer
and the issue seems very unclear to me.
I suppose the argument that the S la...
2011 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
> That's what we need to have a discussion about. If those things will
> work for people, great. If not, we have some stuff to figure out.
Agreed. Hopefully core peeps will chime in.
>> I suppose it's merely a manpower thing now
>
> I'm not assuming that given the volume of e-mail around this.
Sending mail is cheap. Switching to git completely isn't.
2011 Sep 03
0
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
>>>> Yet, there's surprisingly little complaint about Subversion around here,
>>>> which is kinda unfortunate :)
>>>
>>> I know you're being facetious, but why is it unfortunate?
>>
>> Because you're missing so much.
>
> I read Dave's document. It lists (rather complex) ways to use it, but it doesn't list why any of them are needed for our workflow. That would go more towards convincing me that it's a good thing....
2011 Sep 03
0
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
...ople
>>>>> talking so we can find out where everyone is and go from there.
>>>>
>>>> Yet, there's surprisingly little complaint about Subversion around here,
>>>> which is kinda unfortunate :)
>>>
>>> I know you're being facetious, but why is it unfortunate?
>>
>> Because you're missing so much.
>
> I read Dave's document. It lists (rather complex) ways to use it, but it doesn't list why any of them are needed for our workflow. That would go more towards convincing me that it's a good thin...
2006 Mar 07
1
Three level linear mixed models
Hello R-users
Is it possible to fit a three level linear mixed effect model in R?
If anyone has an idea or sample code, i will appreciate it very much if i can receive it.
I am reading the book by Pinheiro and Bates but have not come across that yet!
Kind regards
Pryseley
---------------------------------
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2009 Dec 27
1
very beginner's question
Begging the list's indulgence, an extremely dumb beginner's question. I've got 24 months' worth of numbers - ranging from 2 events per month, to 66 events per month. I want to take a stab at making a reasonable guess as to what the next year's data would be, approximately, i.e., based on the 24 months I've got, I want to be able to tell someone: "the 12 months after
2011 Apr 22
2
statistic Q
Dear,
i am a student and I need help in comparing between different slopes and
finding whther there is a significant difference between them?
Thanks a lot
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2004 May 26
0
Constantin Timoc
Dragi compatrioti,
Numele meu este Constantin Timoc.
Candidez la postul de presedinte al Romaniei pentru a asigura tuturor cetatenilor locuri de munca cat mai bine platite, pentru a distruge coruptia care paralizeaza intreaga societate si pentru a accelera aderarea tarii noastre la Uniunea Europeana.
Fac apel catre toti cetatenii sa aleaga presedinte al Romaniei un candidat care e cinstit,
2011 Jun 03
1
C-Side: Applying a function (given as param) to data (given as param)
Hello,
I'm implementing a package (C-extension),
where one function gets data and a function
that needs to be applied to the data.
I want to apply the function to (parts of)
the data on the C-side.
1) how do I apply a function (given via SEXP) to data
2) how do I select parts of the data (also provided via SEXP)?
Comment on 2: I want to implement a moving/rolling/running
apply on the data,
2011 May 04
1
two-way group mean prediction in survreg with three factors
I'm fitting a regression model for censored data with three categorical
predictors, say A, B, C. My final model based on the survreg function is
Surv(..) ~ A*(B+C).
I know the three-way group mean estimates can be computed using the predict
function. But is there any way to obtain two-way group mean estimates, say
estimated group mean for (A1, B1)-group? The sample group means don't
2011 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> writes:
>> Have we made any progress on a potential git conversion? AFAIK the only
>> outstanding technical issue is the monotonic revision number question.
>> Personally, I have no nead for them but others have expressed
>> reservation about losing them.
>
> There are very decent solutions to the monotonic revnum issue
2006 Jan 05
2
has_many - when are child objects created?
I has several model objects that flow down like a tree:
Class1 has_many Class2
Class2 has_many Class3
and so on.
when are the child records actually created?
If I do:
c1 = Class1.find(:all)
are the child objects (C2s below) created then or not until i do something like:
c2s = c1.C2s while iterating through the c1s?
If the form, that''s cool, no problem, but If I''ve got
1997 Apr 30
0
R-beta: Re: S Compatibility
Martyn Plummer writes:
> How important is it to avoid being sued, or less facetiously, what is
> the legal status of R? If I were Mathsoft I would be less than pleased
> at the development of R and would try to stop it if I could. I have
> been wondering for some time if this is possible. But I am not a lawyer
> and the issue seems very unclear to me.
To me too (Rober...
2009 Jan 19
3
[somewhat OT] seeking ideas/input for my thesis
Hello VoIP guys
Sorry for being somewhat off-topic. At the moment I am studying
informatics in the seventh semester and I need to start thinking about
my thesis. As I am very interested in VoIP technologies I thought about
picking this as my main topic. So far I have only little experience in
this area. I have been fiddling around with siproxd and pfSense and have
red the one or the other packet
2011 Sep 03
4
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
...#39;s why I hope to get people
>>>> talking so we can find out where everyone is and go from there.
>>>
>>> Yet, there's surprisingly little complaint about Subversion around here,
>>> which is kinda unfortunate :)
>>
>> I know you're being facetious, but why is it unfortunate?
>
> Because you're missing so much.
I am not very familiar with GIT so I have a question:
Let's say I don't fork and I work 1 patch at the time. Then what are
the advantages of GIT over svn?