search for: eyeballed

Hi I'm sure this question has been asked before but I can't find it in the archives. I have a data frame which includes interval and ordered nominal results. It looks something like "Measured" "Eyeball" 46.5 Normal 43.5 Mild 56.2 Normal 41.1 Mild 37.8 Moderate 12.6 Severe 17.3 Moderate 39.1 Normal 26.7 Mild NULL Normal 27.9 NULL 68.1

>>> TL;DR: please try the patch out and report if it causes "Did not receive >>> identification string" log messages. I believe it does not. Aw crap. My homegrown anti-dos tool for ssh looks for either DNRIS or if logging is verbose enough a connection that didn't result in a login. I give the attacker a few tries and whitelist any successful candidate so I

Hi, On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:32:26AM +0000, Kim Minh Kaplan wrote: > TL;DR: please try the patch out and report if it causes "Did not receive > identification string" log messages. I believe it does not. It depends on absolute RTT to the target. If you stay local ("< 50ms"), the 250ms offset should reliably avoid DNIS logs. If you happen to connect to Australia

Just a point about plotting and abline with a dotted grid. Try this for size: eh<-function (mx, my, line='dotted') { x <- c(0, mx) y <- c(0, my) plot(x, y, "l") abline(v = seq(0, mx, 10), h = seq(0, my, 10), lty = line) } eh(100,100) eh(100,1000) eh(100,5000) eh(100,10000) When there are enough horizontal lines, the dotted characteristic makes it

I''ve been working on a patch for has_one :through associations and now it needs some verification love. http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4756 Please have a look and see if it fits the bill. Constructive criticism welcome! Thanks, Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Has anyone checked to make sure that this won't upset sshguard? [1] Offhand, it looks like it will [2][3]. [1] https://www.sshguard.net/ [2] https://bitbucket.org/sshguard/sshguard/src/2ed7e0aee18b7271daab92d5335c14e04bb2cc89/src/parser/attacks.txt?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#attacks.txt-9 [3]

Inline below: 2011/4/21 Jeremy Miles <jeremy.miles at gmail.com> > > Just because it comes from a book does not make it true or correct. Amen! > Books are subject to considerably less peer review than journal > articles. Yes, but ... Peer review among journals is uneven, especially for those from private for-profit publishers. And even for top flight journals, dealing with

Hi, Taking this to a new thread. Thoughts on getting a new list started up ? Should it be centos-sysadmin or centos-infra ? Are we going to then restrict it to admin/infra related chatter ? in which case, does the eyeball density on this list reduce for that sort of content ? How about the politics and news stuff that gets posted to this list. And how would those things be addressed with

listadmin, Can you PLEASE, PLEASE find *any* other blacklist than manitu? This asshole's method was ok a dozen years ago; these days, with hosting sites hosting tens or hundreds of thousands of domains, with too many running Windows, and so infected and sending out spam. They then send all mail via one mailhost, with the result that those of us with *no* spam coming out are frequently

FYI, http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1215438 -Rajika -- http://wso2.org/ http://llvm.org/ http://www.osdev.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090405/79ddb769/attachment.html>

On Sunday 05 April 2009 06:33:00 Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > FYI, > http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1215438 > > -Rajika LOL: "In contrast, every time I look at the GCC code, it takes two people to prevent me from clawing my eyeballs out." :-) -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e

I've experienced GCC induced eyeball-clawing.... Not pretty! On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > On Sunday 05 April 2009 06:33:00 Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > > FYI, > > http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1215438 > > > > -Rajika > > LOL: > > "In contrast, every time I look at the GCC

Dear All, I implemented an algorithm for (uniform) random rotations. In order to test it, I can apply it to a unit vector (0,0,1) in Cartesian coordinates. The result is supposed to be a set of random, uniformly distributed, points on a sphere (not the point of the algorithm, but a way to test it). This is what the points look like when I plot them, but other then eyeballing them, can anyone

Hello, I use hosts that are dual stack configured (IPv4 and IPv6) and it happens that connectivity through one or the other is broken and timeouts. In these case connection to the SSH server can take quite some time as ssh waits for the first address to timeout before trying the next. So I gave a stab at implementing RFC 8305. This patch implements part of it in sshconnect.c. * It does not do

Dear List, I have a large (1600*1600) matrix generated with symnum, that I am using to eyeball the structure of a dataset. I have abbreviated the column names with the abbr.colnames option. One way to get an even more compact view of the matrix would be to display the column names rotated by 90 degrees. Any pointers on how to do this would be most useful. Any other tips for displaying the

Dear All, I hope this is not too off topic. I am given a set of scatteplots (nothing too fancy; think about a normal x-y 2D plot). I do not deal with two time series (indeed I have no info about time). If I call A=(A1,A2,...) and B=(B1, B2, ...) the 2 variables (two vectors of numbers most of the case, but sometimes they can be categorical variables), I can plot one against the other and I

All, I am constructing a pharmacokinetic dataset and have hit a snag. The dataset can be demonstrated in the following way: myData <- data.frame( evid = c(1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0), time = 1:10, last.dose.time = c(1, 1, 1, 1, 5, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9) ) The evid field is an indicator variable for whether the associated observation is a dosing record (when it takes value 1) or an

Hi All, LLVM has long needed a tutorial for people who are interested in using it to implement their favorite language and to demonstrate how to use the JIT. To help solve this, I've put together a little tutorial that runs through the implementation and extension of a toy language here: http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/ At this point, the tutorial is feature complete, but might

I like the functionality provided by outer=TRUE, but when it comes time to place separate xlabs or ylabs, I always end up 'eyeballing' it on a case-by-case basis. For example, ##begin example require(lattice) cars.lo <- loess(dist ~ speed, cars) print(xyplot(cars.lo$residuals+cars.lo$fitted~cars.lo$x, strip=FALSE, outer=TRUE, layout=c(1,2),

On 9/25/19 12:06 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > But on the desktop, I've switched to OpenSUSE Leap, and I'm a happy > camper now. I can highly recommend it. Sports every major and minor > desktop environment under the sun, and it's a nice blend of semi-rolling > releases based on a rock-solid SLES base. > Why do you need "every major and minor desktop environment