search for: extortion

Hi all Is the EventMachine website (www.rubyeventmachine.com) down? I can''t access it from South Africa, and have tried using tor as well with no luck. I''m kinda new to EventMachine, so I first have a lot of examples to work through and reading to do before I start pestering the mailing list with questions. Thanks to everyone who partook in creating the library, so far

On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 08:16 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > > > > What matters for the 'free' Red Hat software is ***ONLY*** Red Hat's > > stated terms and conditions - definitely not what someone else has > > put on a web site. > Here is the link: > >

Hi, Currently using voiptalk.org and the quality is getting really bad. I would like a second provider preferably in UK, anyone got any suggestions? Ta. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040421/3d91c7f6/attachment.htm

Dear all, I just know that Sisvel (http://www.sisvel.com) claims patent on MP3 and starting charging fee on MP3 encoding/decoding (http://www.audiompeg.com). I take a look on its patent claims and it seems that they are very board. I wonder if vorbis would be affected by them. Best regards, JJ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, I am running sendmail with MailScanner on CentOS. I want to enable some restrictions. Restrictions are given below. All clients Currently can send Bcc from their workstations as usual. I want to disable (block Bcc) that feature. Can I do it from the Sendmail Server ? All clients currently can send Cc form their workstations as usual. I want to limit it. Let's say about 5 Cc s .

On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 11:17 +0200, Maikel van Leeuwen wrote: > Techopedia explains Production Server > > A production server is the core server on which any website or Web > application is being hosted and accessed by users. It is part of the > entire software and application development environment. Typically, the > production server environment, hardware and software

On 04/05/2016 11:55 AM, Always Learning wrote: > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 08:16 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: >> >>> What matters for the 'free' Red Hat software is ***ONLY*** Red Hat's >>> stated terms and conditions - definitely not what someone else has >>>

I know someone who for the past 4 days has been having the heck ddosed out of him. He runs a gaming server, and ran a report on the ddos; he has 8 pages of that and a few hours ago there were 16 pages. They''re attacking his machine on random ports and he blocks UDP traffic on those ports, but they keep attacking on other ports. So far he''s banned over 800,000 IP''s.

Hi all Does Digium make a quad BRI card? I can't see anything of the sort on their page but I thought they might call it something else in the States. Failing that, can anyone recommend a make/model that would handle 4 BRI ports? -- Cheers Wayne

> >So uh, you think it's worth more for mp3, than the actual music > >involved? > > > >Come on. > > Hmm.. so what you're saying is that for under $2K I can get an unlimited > distribution license from the recording industry? To burn, distribute, > sell and market as much of their material as I like? Wow. Sign me up. Streaming music is $250

At 14:45 6/9/2001 -0600, you wrote: >Streaming music is $250 minimum, with, I believe, less than 2% >royalties. For $500 a year you can stream all the music in the world >pretty much, prefectly legally. If you make a profit, it's a royalty. >But MP3's royalty here is higher than the royalty for the actual music. >That is out of whack. Especially in an age where we are

...windows-1252" Am 08.10.14 um 23:07 schrieb John R. Dennison: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:04:45PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Well, no: they tell me that they are *billed* for each major incident. > > There is a legal term that applies to this use case: "extortion" AFAIK IX is not billing .... They do a great job for couple of years. The problem might be m.roths provider, if they have a zombi spam system somewhere and dynamic IPs e.g. they can be put on the list. http://www.heise.de/ix/NiX-Spam-DNSBL-and-blacklist-for-download-499637.html If your m...

> performances. That's ~125,000 performances a year, which equates to about > $180,000. > > Significantly higher than the Frauhofer license, unless you generate > $9Mil/yr or more in revenue from your stream. The rates are in arbitration, and I doubt they will come out anywhere near that amount. It just isn't feasible, even for large companies. Reember, tradidional