search for: extermely

I have a very strange problem with Mozilla since I updated it to the latest stable. The font used on the menus are rendered extermly badly such as lots of white spaces between the letters, large blocky font. The font option does not seem to change any of those fonts which makes me think it maybe something to do with X11. However, none of the other things I use have any font issues... Any idea

...SNodes.cpp: #ifndef NDEBUG const SUnit *Addr = 0; if (!SUnits.empty()) Addr = &SUnits[0]; #endif SUnits.push_back(SUnit(N, (unsigned)SUnits.size())); assert((Addr == 0 || Addr == &SUnits[0]) && Not only this code does not compile with NDEBUG set but it could trigger an extermely reliable assertion failure in some cases. One could think that this is too rare to happen but it does happen with my scheduler and I'm not quite embarassed because I can't do anything apart from hacking llvm source code. I feel that triggering an assertion failure just because the user made...

I have a couple of methods that I would like to not be available to the world as actions in my ApplicationController, but need to be visible to the methods in my ApplicationController. This is a dumb question yes, and I know the answer is extermely simple. Can I stuff them in another class somewhere? If so, what rails directory do I put it in? Thanks, -Jon -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...) > > Addr = &SUnits[0]; > > #endif > > SUnits.push_back(SUnit(N, (unsigned)SUnits.size())); > > assert((Addr == 0 || Addr == &SUnits[0]) && > > > > Not only this code does not compile with NDEBUG set but it could trigger > an > > extermely reliable assertion failure in some cases. One could think that > > this is too rare to happen but it does happen with my scheduler and I'm > not > > quite embarassed because I can't do anything apart from hacking llvm > source > > code. I feel that triggering an asse...

...it *Addr = 0; >   if (!SUnits.empty()) >     Addr = &SUnits[0]; > #endif >   SUnits.push_back(SUnit(N, (unsigned)SUnits.size())); >   assert((Addr == 0 || Addr == &SUnits[0]) && > > Not only this code does not compile with NDEBUG set but it could trigger an > extermely reliable assertion failure in some cases. One could think that > this is too rare to happen but it does happen with my scheduler and I'm not > quite embarassed because I can't do anything apart from hacking llvm source > code. I feel that triggering an assertion failure just becaus...

...s[0]; >> > #endif >> >   SUnits.push_back(SUnit(N, (unsigned)SUnits.size())); >> >   assert((Addr == 0 || Addr == &SUnits[0]) && >> > >> > Not only this code does not compile with NDEBUG set but it could trigger >> > an >> > extermely reliable assertion failure in some cases. One could think that >> > this is too rare to happen but it does happen with my scheduler and I'm >> > not >> > quite embarassed because I can't do anything apart from hacking llvm >> > source >> > code....

...filling the same need - a one-step easy installation of Asterisk on a brand new PC. Am I missing something? Both have GUIs, but TriBox seems to be more complete with more features. Is this not correct? Thanks so much for any information to help set me on the right path. As you can see, I am extermely confused and lost in the maze of Asterisk docs and struggling to find a little headway here. Eric

Hello... I am encountering a problem sending emails from Windows using an extermal smtp server. When attempting to send out the email, the following error is returned: 501 Syntax: HELO hostname I have checked the format of the emails, and they are ok. It seems it''s choking right at the begging of the connection to the smtp server, when my computer needs to identify itself by sending

I am trying to get a building that has 3 company's on one asterisk server. I need to make the IVR via DID take them to there right menu. So far I have everything working except when they goto via standard_marco to an extension and are sent to voicemail they are dropped off in the first menu and not the one they came from. In other word sent to another company's menu. If it happens to be

------------------ ---------| external ip eth0 | ---------- -------------------------- | |--------------------------- | -------| Internal IP eth1 | -------------------------- | |-------------------------- ---------| external Ip eth2 | ---------- -------------------------- i want to put web and ftp traffic

------------------ ---------| external ip eth0 | ---------- -------------------------- | |--------------------------- | -------| Internal IP eth1 | -------------------------- | |-------------------------- ---------| external Ip eth2 | ---------- -------------------------- i want to put web and ftp traffic to

Devang Patel wrote: > Right now, one big missing piece in this puzzle is - dependence > analysis. Right. I was only trying to say that it shouldn't be very difficult to find these for/do loops which are interesting from the parallelization perspective (in general, not all for/do loops can be reconstructed). As for the dependence analysis, I need this piece for my project, and I am

Group Having trouble installing zaptel. Below is my server specs Intel Motherboard D101GGC TE405P CentOS-4.2-i386 Here is the output trying to do a 'make' =============================================== make clean rm -f torisatool makefw tor2fw.h radfw.h rm -f ztcfg torisatool makefw ztmonitor ztspeed zttool zttest fxotune rm -f *.o ztcfg tzdriver sethdlc sethdlc-new rm -f

On Nov 29, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Wojciech Matyjewicz wrote: > As you have noticed, loops aren't represented directly in the LLVM IR. > However, there are analysis passes which may be helpful to > "reconstruct" > them. For example: LoopInfo pass detects natural loops (as sets of > basic > blocks) and ScalarEvolution pass finds loop induction variables (and >

Chuck, Thank You I'm also going to try CentOS 3 The problem is I have SATA HDD and running in to trouble getting Linux installed. Will update after I test Ver 3 -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chuck Bunn Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 12:45 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -

Anyone have any idea what this is talking about. Here is my zapata.conf [channels] switchtype=5ess signalling=pri_cpe echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=400 callerid=asreceived group=1 context=default musiconhold=default faxdetect=incoming channel => 1-23 Here is my zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-23 # set this to 1-15,17-31 for E1 dchan=24 # set this to 16 for

I have searched for this problem and found this link that says this problem was fixed (for WoW) in Wine 0.9.32 : http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6323 Is anyone else having problems with the numeric keypad not showing numbers under Wine 1.0 ? I have everything working for putty except this crippling problem. I don't feel I can offer a terminal emulator solution where you cannot use

I don't see the issue here. It would be helpful if people would report their sessionInfo() when reporting whether or not they see this issue. Mine is > sessionInfo() R version 3.4.3 (2017-11-30) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) Running under: Arch Linux Matrix products: default BLAS/LAPACK: /usr/lib/libopenblas_haswellp-r0.2.20.so locale: [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

On a selection of boxes, ntpd running in Xen Dom0 reproducibly exhibits extermely high noise/jitter. Switching back to -default, non-xen kernel ntpd runs with very low jitter/noise. Question -- how can I ''tame'' ntpd noise & jitter when running in Dom0? Is the problem a config issue, or a bug? Already reported this downstream; everybody''s "s...

On a selection of boxes, ntpd running in Xen Dom0 reproducibly exhibits extermely high noise/jitter. Switching back to -default, non-xen kernel ntpd runs with very low jitter/noise. Question -- how can I ''tame'' ntpd noise & jitter when running in Dom0? Is the problem a config issue, or a bug? Already reported this downstream; everybody''s "s...