search for: explcitily

...n computing a "Ymax" to put in (say) ylim = c(0,Ymax). However, for certain reasons, I would prefer not to have to do this. (And it's just a preference ... ). Whereas one can leave the whole issue of setting both plotting limits to plot(), by not specifying ylim (or xlim), or one can explcitily specify both the upper and lower limits by (say) ylim=c(Ymin,Ymax), there seems to be no way of fixing one and leaving the other floating so that plot() would do its own thing. ylim requires two numbers to be given. Things like ylim=c(0,) or ylim=c(0,NA) would generate an error. Am I chasing a ph...

...ScheduleDAG::EmitNode has a FrameIndex as its second operand. This is especially problematic because the code is either expecting a VirtualRegister or a RegisterSDNode in this location. I've checked all locations where I use the DAG.getCopyToReg function and none of them pass in a frameindex. I explcitily check that I have a register before passing in the value to Register number to CopyToReg, so this leads me to believe that it is being generated somehow by LLVM. In the case I sent earlier in this thread it only occurs when I turn optimizations on, but the new case I hit with optimizations off bu...

...on't think anyone can help you until you can track down what is creating the FrameIndex. Why not set a break point in MachineFrameInfo::CreateFixedObject and CreateStackObject? Evan > > locations where I use the DAG.getCopyToReg function and none of them > pass in a frameindex. I explcitily check that I have a register before > passing in the value to Register number to CopyToReg, so this leads me > to believe that it is being generated somehow by LLVM. > > In the case I sent earlier in this thread it only occurs when I turn > optimizations on, but the new case I hit wi...

Other than not using debugging ('-g' and the like), not really. :-( I think that Devang is actively working on fixing this, though. It might not be too much longer. -bw On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > This did not seem to work, any other ideas? > > Thanks, > > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at

...on't think anyone can help you until you can track down what is creating the FrameIndex. Why not set a break point in MachineFrameInfo::CreateFixedObject and CreateStackObject? Evan > > locations where I use the DAG.getCopyToReg function and none of them > pass in a frameindex. I explcitily check that I have a register before > passing in the value to Register number to CopyToReg, so this leads me > to believe that it is being generated somehow by LLVM. > > In the case I sent earlier in this thread it only occurs when I turn > optimizations on, but the new case I hit wi...

This did not seem to work, any other ideas? Thanks, -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Wendling Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:26 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Hitting assertion, unsure why Don't generate debug info at this time (you can use "opt -strip-debug")?