search for: experimenters

As part of the work on C++17, WG21 released a series of "Technical Specifications", (TS) which added proposed new features to the standard library. These were all defined in the namespace 'std::experimental' (and namespaces inside of that). Then, much of these features were merged into the main standard, and became part of namespace 'std'. Libc++ now has two

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 496359 secuirity Unknown tag/s: secuirity. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore lenny lenny-ignore. Bug#496359: The possibility of attack with the help

I second Justin's suggestion, but would that happen in LLVM 5 or 6? Just as something to consider, it may also cause spurious errors for people who are relying on the at-version-stability of experimental libraries, causing them to turn off warnings for deprecated code. As C Bergstrom has said, users buy into experimental libraries with the knowledge that the interface or behaviour could

libxen-dev_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb to main/x/xen/libxen-dev_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb libxenstore3.0_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb to main/x/xen/libxenstore3.0_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb (new) xen-docs-4.0_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_all.deb optional doc Documentation for Xen This package contains all the large documentation files for Xen. This includes a description

Hi I finally did the merge for Xen 4.0. For this I decided to rename the source package back to xen. The packages are available via http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test. ec1482e14f2515bd6878da0d2229b725993601fa libxen-dev_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb 7c394f7158ca387225935f3bbe26bdc5518a1934 libxenstore3.0_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb

Hi, I am trying to build a binary of Rquantlib package 0.3.5 under Window 7 64bits. I am using mingw gcc version 4.5.1 (tdm64-1) which is a experimental version of 64 bits ming gcc. (http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/). I have successfully compiled boost 1.45 and Quantlib 1.0.1 with this gcc. And then when I tried to compile Rquantlib 0.3.5, it reports some error. The first error is like below.

Hi all, It is my understanding that now WebKit depends on the stack map functionality in production. Also, on the mailing lists we've seen lots of users using in this feature. Can we eliminate the experimental status for 3.5? Off the top of my head, the changes needed are: - A read-through of StackMaps.rst to remove any mention of it being experimental. - Removing mention of it being

Hi all, I recently, on behalf of a new LLVM contributor, pushed commit 740bc366d44c <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG740bc366d44ccd41161739bc1d4b447cd49aba65>, which broke an in-tree test for the AVR backend (see http://45.33.8.238/mac/7865/step_11.txt). On the review https://reviews.llvm.org/D72992, a request was made to fix the test or revert the change. This test didn't fail locally or

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > As part of the work on C++17, WG21 released a series of "Technical > Specifications", (TS) which added proposed new features to the standard > library. These were all defined in the namespace 'std::experimental' (and > namespaces inside of that). > > Then, much of these

Hi all, While working on a patch to improve codegen for fadd reductions on AArch64, I stumbled upon an outstanding issue with the experimental.vector.reduce.fadd/fmul intrinsics where the accumulator argument is ignored when fast-math is set on the intrinsic call. This behaviour is described in the LangRef (https://www.llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#id1905) and is mentioned in

On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 01:14, Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2020, at 10:01 AM, Alex Bradbury via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I believe code should be committed to LLVM when it is of sufficient > > quality, when it can be shown to benefit the LLVM user or developer > > communities, and when there is someone

Hai Guys, I've uploaded the Debian Buster samba 4.12 packages to the buster-experimental repo. These need some extra love in tests, so if your able to please these a bit. And report back to me/the samba list. ONLY amd64 and i386 Packages. (sorry armhf is still building) Repo setup. wget -O - http://apt.van-belle.nl/louis-van-belle.gpg-key.asc | apt-key add - echo "deb

Hai, I've prepared a fist set of 4.11RC2 packages. PLEASE DONT USE THESE IN PRODUCTION and USE AT OWN RISK.. I've tested the basic things and this looks good. ----------- THE REPO SETUP --------------- 1) Choose http or https for you apt, both work, for https you need to : apt-get install apt-transport-https 2) Import my public key wget -O -

In -help output, -help - Display available options (--help-hidden for more) Both single and double - option markers are accepted, which is good. It would probably be better to refer to options consistently using the single marker in all cases. =linearscan - linear scan register allocator =pbqp - PBQP

On 7/19/2016 6:12 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: > > I don't see why not. LGTM. Same here. -Krzysztof -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#new-targets says that experimental backends should be supported by an active community, in part by providing build bots and fixing bugs related to the backend. So while it doesn't *explicitly* say things about patches that only break those backends, I think reading the spirit of that policy says that it's the responsibility of the experimental

On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> >> I recommend, this being the case, to replace 'webkit' with 'experimental'. Having webkit in the name implies some dependence on webkit, and there is none. Plus, this functionality will be used by outside projects as soon as it lands in trunk, and I suspect that having webkit in the

@Louis, thanks for your answer. I've gone through the steps I found on your site, but when I wanted to install the packages, Debian didn't found the newer packages. I tried to give the version number to the apt-get, but it didn't help. apt-get install -t o=AptVanBelle samba=4.10.5+nmu-1debian0 winbind=4.10.5+nmu-1debian0 libnss-winbind=4.10.54.10.5+nmu-1debian0

I'm interested in using @llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.smax/umax to implement runtime overflow checking for vectors. Here's an example checked addition, without vectors, and then I'll follow the example with what I would do for checked addition with vectors. Frontend code (zig): export fn entry() void { var a: i32 = 1; var b: i32 = 2; var x = a + b; } LLVM IR code:

A Proposal for adding an experimental IR-level region-annotation infrastructure ============================================================================= Hal Finkel (ANL) and Xinmin Tian (Intel) This is a proposal for adding an experimental infrastructure to support annotating regions in LLVM IR, making use of intrinsics and metadata, and a generic analysis to allow transformations to