search for: experiemntal

Gulhsdholgv signature yfhjvhgvhgjhgfj Envoyé depuis SFR Mail - iPhone ____________________ De : "Valery Khamenya" Date : 13 sept. 2010 11:45:57 À : "LLVM Developers Mailing List" Sujet : [LLVMdev] Any experiemnts/evaluations on LLVM and graph rewriting (term-rewriting) systems? Hi, are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) language

Hi Valery On 13 September 2010 19:07, Valery Khamenya <khamenya at gmail.com> wrote: > are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) > language implementations? I've added a new LLVM backend to the ghc Haskell compiler. > How good is LLVM for this? Works very well. I'm operating from the low levels of the ghc compiler though where I don't

Valery Khamenya wrote: > are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) > language implementations? Pure is a dynamically typed FPL based on term rewriting: http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/ It uses the LLVM JIT to compile and execute code on the fly in an interpreter-like environment, and can also batch-compile code to native executables. This includes the

Dearl all, I have to fit a function y = f(x1, x2) to data experiemntal data describing the measured behavior of y. x1 and x2 are the independent variables. Could you suggest me wich R package can I use for this purpose? Thanks, Paola. -- *Paola Lecca, PhD* *The Microsoft Research - University of Trento* *Centre for Computational and Systems Biology* *Piazza Manc...

Hi, are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) language implementations? How good is LLVM for this? E.g., is it natural to expect that the LLVM-based implementation of the language Concurrent Clean be any faster than its reference implementation? Best regards -- Valery A.Khamenya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I would like to start experiemnting with the ext filesystems. I might like one day to develop something. :) What files contain the ext4 filesystem. That's what I'm running right now. I like ext 2/3/4 all of them. My fedora partition is only 20 GB in size. I don't need huge filesystem support which is a feature of ext4 I believe. Which feature can I remove to remove this feature? I

Dear List, I am looking for a function `Pseudo standard error' (PSE), which is available in S+ DOX (design of experiemnt) module - Is there a similar function available in R? Reference for PSE function is in the paper: 'Quick and easy analysis of unreplicated factorials' by Russell V. Lenth, Technometrics, 1989, 31, 4, 469-473. Thanks. -Nitin

Hi. I'm a student in a graduate program at Simon Fraser University in Canada. I am trying to run a simple screening experiment with some simulated data. I simply want to do an ANOVA of an experiemnt with 5 factors (4 have 2 levels, the last has 3 levels) and 48 runs (ie, full factorial). The thing is that I have multiple observations for each level combination (run). So, 1) How do I do

Hey, I am in the process of trying (and convincing my colleagues) to learn/setup selinux as we switch to 6.0... Quick question: do I really "need" to install the setools/setroubleshoot packages or can I live without them?? They want to install 80 packages (gnome stuff, gstreamer, gtk, tcl/tk...) and I would like to avoid installing all sort of graphical tools/libs on my lean

On 8/17/14, 2:52 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote: > I would like to start experiemnting with the ext filesystems. I might > like one day to develop something. :) What files contain the ext4 > filesystem. That's what I'm running right now. I like ext 2/3/4 all of them. fs/ext4/*.[ch] fs/jbd2/*.[ch] in the linux kernel source tree. > My fedora partition is only 20 GB in size.

I have searched the samba archive site and found a reference to the parameter "domain user map". It is also documented in the on-line documentation. Since I only had samba version 2.0.0 I decided to download the latest, which turns out to be 2.0.3. However, this version does not appear to have the parameter "domain user map" either!! I did see in an article from the

Hi, I'm wondering if samba supports NTLMv2, particullary NTLMv2 session security. But I can't even get NTLM-only to work :(. I'm trying to increase lmcompatibilitylevel, but I can't connect to the samba server anymore when I set it to 2 or higher ("Send NTLM authenication only"). I'm using HEAD CVS of today, and my smb.conf looks like this: [global]

Hi, Keir, These patches are rebased version of Yunhong''s original patches, which were sent out before XEN 3.2 was released. These patches enable MSI support and limited MSI-X support in XEN. Here is the original description of the patches from Yunhong''s mail. The basic idea including: 1) Keep vector global resource owned by xen, while split pirq into per-domain