search for: expedit

Please note clarifications in <<>> below. My apologies for any confusion. Thanks again, Scott ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Scott Stark <stark.sc@gmail.com> Date: Aug 23, 2007 1:03 PM Subject: Expedite scalar f(x) evaluation over vectors To: r-help@lists.r-project.org Dear R community, I am trying to code a fairly complex equation for optim(). My current approach is too slow for optim(). I have a function that takes a double integral (hopefully correctly) across two terms, e.g., <<not...

Hello, all. I've stumbled across what seems to be a traffic prioritization issue in a Linux environment and wonder if anyone else has encountered or addressed this issue. We had planned to use expedited forwarding for our RTP and perhaps our SIP packets. Our plan was to set DSCP to 101110 (by the way, I think document http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/snom+360 is in error as I'm almost certain the expedited forwarding bits are 101110 and not 100010). However, we realized that when these pa...

...}) }, boundsy[1],boundsy[2]) } I would like to rapidly evaluate this function over vectors c1 and c2 of equal length where the double integral is calculated for each (matching) element c1_i & c2_i. At present I get length mismatch errors. Furthermore, mapply() takes too long. Can I expedite this evaluation or do I need to reformulate my approach? Thanks in advance for your help, Scott C. Stark University of Arizona [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

When attempting to compile a dynamic language like python/java does LLVM allow a function to compile itself one at a time? In other words, can I parse a function, then gain the machine bit code, then execute without parsing the other functions related to the compiled function? Thanks, Jeff Kunkel

...rate Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew Richmond, TW9 3AB, UK Tel: +44 (0)208 332 5277 email: jenny.williams@kew.org<mailto:jenny.williams@kew.org> ****************** Film: The Forgotten Home of Coffee - Beyond the Gardens<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uDtytKMKpA&sns=tw> Stories: Coffee Expedition - Ethiopia<http://storify.com/KewGIS/coffee-expedition-ethiopia> Blog: Discovering Coffee in Ethiopia <http://www.kew.org/news/kew-blogs/incrEdibles-food-blog/discovering-coffee.htm> Kew in Harapan Rainforest Sumatra<http://storify.com/KewGIS/kew-in-ha...

...gt; samba share. as far as socket options im using socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_KEEPALIVE Is there any other tweaks I can use to help make this system more reliable? I get random errors.."network path not found" or something similar.. = Aconcagua Expedition with Alpine Ascents Aconcagua Expedition with America's Guide Service. International expeditions to the world's highest peaks. Comprehensive mountaineering school. The Seven Summits Company since 1986. http://a8-asy.a8ww.net/a8-ads/adftrclick?redirectid=9b35cc99a796487659e031c2859d46a8...

...1500 i.e. 1500 columns representing companies and 1000 rows of their returns. I need to find the correlation matrix of these 1500 companies. So I can find out the correlation as cor(returns) and expect to get 1500 * 1500 matrix. However, the process takes a tremendous time. Is there any way in expediting such a process. In reality, I may be dealing with lots of even 5000 stocks and may simulate even 100000 stock returns. Kindly guide. Vincy [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ten, vector math lib call using Intel SVML)   Summary: -------- Summary of the current state of VPlan infrastructure project is presented, and the remaining steps towards outer loop vectorization is listed. We are currently at a point where we can slow down the refactoring effort for the purpose of expediting the big functionality boost: outer loop vectorization ----- and by doing so encourage more participation from the wider LLVM community in the refactoring effort to expedite the overall transition to the VPlan framework. Shortly, we will send out an RFC to solicit community feedback on our plan...

This issue was identified about a month ago and a fix (by Mike) is currently in SVN...it would probably make sense to do a patch release, or even better, expedite the 2.1 release. oddsock At 09:35 AM 5/12/2004, you wrote: > > Anybody from the core can tell about the background and possible > > fixes? > > > TITLE: > > Icecast Basic Authorization Denial of Service Vulnerability > >I'm all for full and immediate disclosure...

I learned some interesting lessons while working with FXRegistry so far. I decided to blog my learnings so I can remember them later. I thought I''d post a note here in case anyone is interested. There are 2 blog posts: http://ruby-expedition.blogspot.com/2010/04/fxregistry-and-windows-registry.html http://ruby-expedition.blogspot.com/2010/04/saving-window-position-with-fxregistry.html The second blog post identifies a small ''bug'' that I found with the ''imageviewer.rb'' example app. It''s...

...supported version just yet. It's been > out for less than two years and until "14" drops, it is the newest > version of the compiler. When we made the switch, the goal was to > support only the last two versions of MSVC, and I don't see any strong > evidence to support expediting that schedule. I think this is a great > plan for when "14" is officially released. > > ~Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/...

...the R-Bugs page to the either of these FAQs, nor a list of bugs that should not be reported. If you wish users to follow a specific protocol for reporting bugs (and the RFaq section 9 does not request port-mortem dumps, or list bugs nots to report), specifying this protocol on the R-Bugs page will expedite matters. -- Ronnen -- -- Ronnen Levinson, Ph.D. \/ RML27@cornell.edu scientist || http://ronnen.com Lawrence Berkeley National Lab /\ fax 425.955.1992 ====================================== Arthur Dent hoped and prayed there wasn't an aft...

Hi folks, Can anyone shed light on this issue? I haven't heard from you guys. Is there anything else I could do to expedite resolution of this issue? I've read the WHATSNEW.txt and reviewed the release notes. I am not sure if I've fully grasped what needs to be done. Can someone point me in the right direction? ~Doug -----Original Message----- From: Doug Sampson [mailto:dougs@dawnsign.com] Sent: Tuesday, Sept...

I’d like to propose raising the minimum required compiler for the LLVM & Clang trunks for Visual Studio to MSVC 2013. Doing this will allow us to take advantage of a bunch of C++11 features that are not supported by MSVC 2012. According to MSDN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx) the list is: * Non-static data member initializers * Variadic templates * Initializer lists *

Hi, I’m new to R (just installed today) and I’m trying to figure out how to do stratified randomisation using it. My google search expedition has lead me to believe that blockrand package will most probably be the answer to it. I’ve played around with blockrand for awhile and tried the sample code: library(blockrand) ##stratified by sex male <- blockrand(n=100, id.prefix='M', block.prefix='M',stratum='...

I see you haven?t received an answer. Sorry people here don?t seem to have time or inclination to answer basic questions. I?ve tried. You?re better to search elsewhere. Ethon > On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Michael Segel <dovecot_mjs at hotmail.com <mailto:dovecot_mjs at hotmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I?ve downloaded and built dovecot from the source. >

...a considerably more interesting case (at least to me) than > hypothetical benefits -- if we retain MSVC 2012 support, we will also > require /bigobj support, have slower compile times for ASTMatcher > projects, and slower benchmarks for clang-tidy. This points to > concrete benefits to expediting switching away from MSVC 2012, which > is why I am pinging this thread again. I guess I'm a little surprised that /bigobj is such a compile-time hit, but haven't tried any benchmarking. Anyway, whatever works best for you. --paulr > > Thanks! > > ~Aaron > > ____...

Hi, I am trying to get assured forwarding/expedited forwarding with gred and htb working. Below is the script I am using. The following steps are what I thing is how the script works. My problem is that if I remove the HTB qdisc from the script and have the GREDS parent as the dsmark it works, but when I add the htb as a parent of GRED and DSmark...

...! > > You could try updating to 2.2.28, if possible. I believe this bug is > fixed in 2.2.28, with > https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/1fd44e0634ac312d0960f39f9518b71e08248b65 > Ah yes, that looks like the culprit indeed. I shall poke the powers that be over at Debian bugs to expedite the 2.2.28 release and backport. Christian -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer chibi at gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications http://www.gol.com/

...uring over several RFCs, Howto documents, and lots of other documentation, I think this very simple script will do the trick. The theory - by default, all interfaces have a classless PFIFO queue with three bands. So all I need to do is set the appropriate DS bits in the packet header to the EF (Expedited Forward) value and everything else will just work. Linux will put the packets in the top PFIFO priority band and they''ll go thru my Firewall at Warp 9.9 regardless of other traffic from other users. Assumptions: (1) I don''t care about slowing down other traffic flows. H.323...