search for: expects_render

Hi All, I''m trying to make use of template.expects_render, is outlined in David''s post(http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/articles/2007/06/28/ template-expects_render). I get an undefined method error on expects_render. I made sure I had the 1.0.8 gem as well as reinstalling the plugin and redoing the bootstrap. Still no luck. So I created a...

Hi, Is it possible to do the following in a controller spec? @controller.should_receive(:render).with(:layout => false) I''ve been trying this kind of thing and it looks like RSpec is messing with the render calls, and requires you to use render_template instead. Could we have at least a warning that mentions that parameters passed to :render expectations are going to be thrown

Hi, I''m very new to rspec so please be patient with me. I''ve tried to take some of my tests out of the controller specs to check for things that are rendered. This has not worked so well, since my views have the controller method current_user in quite a few places. Is there any way that I can define this so that my views will be executed? Will this same thing occur for all

Hi In a controller I have method that is accessed via an AJAX call and will conditionally do: render :nothing => true to test the condition hitting this line I was hoping to do something like: response.should render_template(:nothing) How should I test this behaviour? Cheers Shane

Trunksters, I just added a couple of methods to ActionView::Base in Spec::Rails (as of r2136) that lets you do this in view examples: describe ''/things/index.html.erb'' do it "should render _thing with a collection of things" do assigns[:things] = things = [Object.new] template.expect_render(:partial => ''thing'', :collection => things)

<font size="2">I''m working on a large Rails site and we want to move from RSpec 0.8.2 to the latest and greatest.&nbsp; So we ran the translator and yet we''re having a lot of trouble translating should_render.<br><br>I found this on the web:<br><br>We will NOT be supporting the following in the new syntax:<br>&nbsp;