search for: expandinop_stor

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "expandinop_stor".

Did you mean: expandinop_store
[LLVMdev] Type Legalizer Question.
2008 Sep 30
2
[LLVMdev] Type Legalizer Question.
All the sub methods called inside ExpandIntegerOperand like ExpandInOp_STORE etc have access to the expanded operands map. Why they aren't passed to target LowerOperation? A target may also want to use the already expanded Lo and Hi parts. - Sanjiv -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipe...
[LLVMdev] Type Legalizer Question.
2008 Sep 30
0
[LLVMdev] Type Legalizer Question.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:48 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote: > All the sub methods called inside ExpandIntegerOperand like ExpandInOp_STORE > etc have access to the expanded operands map. > > Why they aren't passed to target LowerOperation? A target may also want to > use the already expanded Lo and Hi parts. You don't really need access to the map; just use build an EXTRACT_ELEMENT node, and legalize will take ca...
[LLVMdev] Type Legalizer Question.
2008 Oct 01
2
[LLVMdev] Type Legalizer Question.
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:48 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote: > > All the sub methods called inside ExpandIntegerOperand like > ExpandInOp_STORE > > etc have access to the expanded operands map. > > > > Why they aren't passed to target LowerOperation? A target may also want > to > > use the already expanded Lo and Hi parts. > > You don't really need access to the map; just use build an > EXTRACT...